AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive split between these two processors, but only one of them has any benchmark results in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals listed. The Intel Core i5-14400T carries a full suite of 17 benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 27166, and a percentile rank of 79 versus all CPUs. This means the comparison is entirely one-sided in terms of available measurements.

The Intel Core i5-14400T delivers a multi-core score of 17189 in Cinebench R23 and a single-core score of 2426 in the same test. In Cinebench R20, it scores 7219 multi-core and 1018 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 results show 1732 multi-core and 244 single-core. These scores place the i5-14400T at the 79th percentile among all CPUs in the database, which indicates it sits comfortably above the median processor population.

The Passmark suite adds more detail. The i5-14400T reaches 20223 in multithread testing and 3512 in single-thread testing. Integer math scores 65667, floating point math scores 49139, and extended instructions score 14562. Data compression hits 235636, data encryption scores 13244, and random string sorting reaches 25181. Find prime numbers scores 73, and the physics test scores 1244.

The nearest rivals for the i5-14400T provide context for these numbers. The Intel Core i9-9900K has an average score of 27097, which is 0.3 percent behind the i5-14400T. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051, 0.4 percent behind. The Intel Core i7-13700H scores 27355, 0.7 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 27382, 0.8 percent ahead. The i5-14400T therefore sits in a tight cluster with these four processors, all within a one percent band of each other. That is a narrow margin, and the data shows the i5-14400T is effectively peer-level with a last-gen desktop flagship and a modern mobile H-series chip.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495, no comparable figures exist in the database. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, the wins counter shows zero for both sides, and the average benchmark score is zero. The percentile rank for the AMD part is 50, which is the median value by definition when no measured data is present, not a reflection of tested performance. Any statement about how the AMD chip performs relative to the Intel chip cannot be supported by the recorded measurements.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400T wins every category where data exists, simply because it is the only processor with recorded scores. In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17189 and the Passmark multithread score of 20223 both confirm strong parallel throughput. In single-threaded tasks, the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2426 and the Passmark single-thread score of 3512 show competitive per-core performance. Specialized workloads also show results: integer math at 65667, floating point math at 49139, and extended instructions at 14562 all indicate a capable general-purpose desktop processor.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no benchmark wins in the database. The wins counter for the AMD side is zero. The wins counter for the Intel side is also zero, because the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. This is not a case of one chip beating the other in specific tests; it is a case of no comparative tests being recorded at all. The database cannot assign any workload victory to the AMD part based on the available facts.

The use-case split therefore falls entirely on the Intel side by default of having measurements. The i5-14400T shows strength in content creation workloads that rely on multi-core scaling, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17189 and Passmark multithread score of 20223 indicate. It also shows strength in everyday responsiveness, where the single-thread score of 3512 in Passmark and 2426 in Cinebench R23 matter. The Passmark data compression score of 235636 points to solid file archiving and compression throughput. The data encryption score of 13244 indicates reasonable cryptographic workload handling. The physics score of 1244 suggests moderate performance in physics simulation tasks.

The AMD part, lacking any recorded scores, cannot be assigned wins in any category. Its market segment is mobile, its integrated graphics is the Radeon 8065S, and its memory support is LPDDR5X, but the database has no benchmark evidence of how those features translate into workload performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers, different process nodes, and different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14400T uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD chip is built on the Gorgon Halo codename with a Zen 5 generation label, while the Intel chip uses the Raptor Lake-R codename with a Raptor Lake Refresh generation label.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD part has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel part has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD chip has a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The AMD chip carries a 55 watt TDP, while the Intel chip carries a 35 watt TDP.

Cache layouts also differ. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel chip has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache is a major differentiator: the AMD chip has 64 MB, while the Intel chip has 20 MB shared. The die size for the AMD chip is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², while the Intel die is 215 mm².

Memory support diverges completely. The AMD chip uses LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and no memory bandwidth figure recorded. Both processors support ECC memory. The PCIe interfaces differ: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes on the CPU, while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD chip uses the Radeon 8065S, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD chip targets the mobile market segment and uses the AMD Socket FP11. The Intel chip targets the desktop market segment and uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part was released on 2026-05-19, while the Intel part was released on 2024-01-07. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The AMD chip has a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: How do the TDP ratings compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a 55 watt TDP. The Intel Core i5-14400T has a 35 watt TDP.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The AMD chip supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and no recorded bandwidth figure.

Q: Does the database contain benchmark results for the AMD processor?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no benchmark entries, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed. All 17 recorded benchmark scores belong to the Intel Core i5-14400T.

Q: How does the Intel chip compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The i5-14400T has an average benchmark score of 27166. The Intel Core i9-9900K scores 27097, 0.3 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051, 0.4 percent behind. The Intel Core i7-13700H scores 27355, 0.7 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 27382, 0.8 percent ahead.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD base clock is 3.10 GHz versus 1.50 GHz for Intel. The AMD boost clock is 5.20 GHz versus 4.50 GHz for Intel. The AMD TDP is 55 watts versus 35 watts for Intel.

The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD codename is Gorgon Halo with Zen 5 generation, while the Intel codename is Raptor Lake-R with Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The AMD process node is 4 nm from TSMC, while the Intel node is 10 nm from Intel. The AMD die size is 2x 70.6 mm², while the Intel die size is 215 mm².

L2 cache per core is 1 MB on the AMD side and 1.25 MB on the Intel side. L3 cache is 64 MB on the AMD side and 20 MB shared on the Intel side. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core.

Memory support differs: LPDDR5X with quad-channel on AMD, DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel on Intel. Memory bandwidth is 273.1 GB/s for AMD, with no figure recorded for Intel. PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are the Radeon 8065S for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. The AMD market segment is mobile, while the Intel segment is desktop. The AMD release date is 2026-05-19, while the Intel release date is 2024-01-07. The Intel launch MSRP is $221. The AMD part number is 100-000002124, and the Intel part number is SRN3N.

The Verdict

The data supports only one conclusion for measured performance: the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only processor in this comparison with benchmark results. Its average benchmark score of 27166 and its 79th percentile rank among all CPUs demonstrate solid mid-range desktop performance. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i9-9900K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, all sit within one percent of its average score, which confirms the i5-14400T trades blows with established desktop processors from previous generations.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 cannot be evaluated for performance from the database. It has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile rank of 50 is a neutral placeholder, not a measured result. The specifications suggest a very different chip: more cores, more threads, higher clocks, a larger L3 cache, a smaller process node, and significantly higher memory bandwidth. But specifications alone do not produce benchmark scores, and the database records none for this part.

A builder choosing between these two parts faces an asymmetric decision. The Intel chip has verified performance data across 17 tests, a clear market position, and a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD chip offers a mobile form factor, a newer process node, and a much larger cache and memory bus, but no measured results to confirm how those translate into real workload performance. The recorded data favors the Intel chip for anyone who requires benchmark-verified performance. The AMD chip remains an unmeasured quantity in this database.