AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i5-14400F

The database record for this comparison pairs a 16-core AMD mobile processor, the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495, against a 10-core Intel desktop part, the Core i5-14400F. The AMD chip carries the newer 4 nm process, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm node. Although the AMD processor has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, the Intel part has an extensive set of measurements across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark tests. This analysis interprets those Intel scores and the architectural facts for both chips.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons for these two processors. The recorded data for the Intel Core i5-14400F provides the only measurable performance results, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has an empty benchmark array. The Intel chip posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a single-core score of 3055. In Cinebench R20, the Intel part scores 9090 multi-core and 1283 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 2181 multi-core and 307 single-core for the Intel processor.

Geekbench measurements for the Intel Core i5-14400F show a multi-core score of 11268 and a single-core score of 2058. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 25470, a single-thread score of 3701, and a physics score of 1523. The Intel chip also records integer math at 81524, floating point math at 61319, and extended instructions at 19937. Data encryption scores 16949, data compression scores 315521, random string sorting scores 32680, and find prime numbers scores 86.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279 and sits at the 83rd percentile. The Intel chip's nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U with an average score of 32233 and a delta of 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i9-11900 with 32226 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS with 32354 and a delta of -0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i7-12800H with 32121 and a delta of 0.5 percent. The Core i5-14400F sits within half a percent of all four rivals, indicating that its measured performance lands in a tightly packed cluster.

Without recorded AMD scores, no win count can be assigned. The data shows zero wins for each processor in the head-to-head field. The Intel chip's measured results stand alone as the only quantitative performance evidence in this comparison.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO generation built on Zen 5. The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core i5 generation described as Raptor Lake Refresh. The AMD processor is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process manufactured by Intel. The AMD die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², and the Intel die size is 215 mm².

Core counts differ substantially. The AMD chip provides 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel chip provides 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks show the AMD part at 3.10 GHz and the Intel part at 2.50 GHz. Boost clocks show the AMD part at 5.20 GHz and the Intel part at 4.70 GHz. The AMD processor has a thermal design power of 55 watts, and the Intel processor has a thermal design power of 65 watts.

Cache configurations also differ between the two. Both processors list 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD processor supports LPDDR5X memory across a quad-channel bus with a recorded memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded in the database.

The AMD chip includes integrated Radeon 8065S graphics, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP11 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. Both processors support ECC memory. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part carries part number 100-000002124, and the Intel part carries part number SRN3RSRN47.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400F wins on measurable performance evidence because it is the only chip in this pair with recorded benchmark scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and single-core score of 3055 establish a baseline for rendering workloads. The Cinebench R20 results of 9090 multi-core and 1283 single-core follow the same pattern. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11268 and single-core score of 2058 confirm broad application performance. PassMark multi-thread at 25470 and single-thread at 3701 add further context for productivity tasks.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 wins on architectural specifications. It has 16 cores and 32 threads compared to the Intel part's 10 cores and 16 threads. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz exceeds the Intel part's 4.70 GHz. Its base clock of 3.10 GHz exceeds the Intel part's 2.50 GHz. The AMD chip carries a larger 64 MB L3 cache versus the Intel chip's 20 MB. The AMD processor also draws less power at 55 watts versus 65 watts for the Intel chip. The AMD chip's integrated Radeon 8065S graphics provide a display output and compute capability that the Intel part lacks entirely. The AMD memory interface spans quad-channel LPDDR5X with 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth, whereas the Intel part uses a dual-channel interface with no bandwidth figure on record.

The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD chip targets the mobile market segment, and the Intel chip targets the desktop segment. The AMD part has a production status of Active and a release date of 2026-05-19, while the Intel part has a production status of Active and a release date of 2024-01-07. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $196, a figure that appears once in this analysis per the database record.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across every major specification field in the database. Core and thread counts show the AMD chip at 16 cores and 32 threads versus the Intel chip at 10 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds show the AMD base clock at 3.10 GHz and boost clock at 5.20 GHz, while the Intel base clock sits at 2.50 GHz and boost clock at 4.70 GHz. Thermal design power shows AMD at 55 watts and Intel at 65 watts.

The process node differs at 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel, with foundries of TSMC and Intel respectively. Die size shows the AMD part at 2x 70.6 mm² and the Intel part at 215 mm². L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, but L2 cache differs at 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache shows a major gap: 64 MB for AMD versus 20 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support differs with LPDDR5X on the AMD side and DDR4 and DDR5 on the Intel side. Memory bus width differs at quad-channel for AMD and dual-channel for Intel. The AMD chip records 273.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth; the Intel chip has no bandwidth figure in the database. PCIe support differs with Gen 4 and 16 lanes for AMD versus Gen 5 and 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics differ with Radeon 8065S on the AMD chip and none on the Intel chip. Sockets differ with AMD Socket FP11 for the AMD part and Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part. Market segments differ with Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. Release dates differ at 2026-05-19 for AMD and 2024-01-07 for Intel. Part numbers differ at 100-000002124 for AMD and SRN3RSRN47 for Intel.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the recorded benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495. Its benchmark array is empty, its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400F compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U at 32233 with a delta of 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i9-11900 at 32226 with a delta of 0.2 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS at 32354 with a delta of -0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i7-12800H at 32121 with a delta of 0.5 percent.

Q: What memory configurations do these processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel bus with 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14400F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded.

Q: Do either of these processors include integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 includes integrated Radeon 8065S graphics. The Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A in the database.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings for these two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a thermal design power of 55 watts. The Intel Core i5-14400F has a thermal design power of 65 watts.