AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and Intel Core i5-14401E occupy different corners of the processor market, with the AMD part targeting high-end mobile workstations and the Intel chip serving mainstream desktop systems. The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark runs between these two CPUs, so the analysis below relies on their respective specification sheets, the Intel part's recorded Cinebench scores, and its position among nearest rivals. The AMD processor holds a 16-core, 32-thread configuration with a 55 W TDP, while the Intel chip offers 6 cores and 12 threads at a 65 W TDP. These fundamental differences in core counts, memory support, and platform positioning create a clear separation in workload suitability.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is built for heavily threaded workloads and memory-bandwidth-sensitive applications. Its 16 cores and 32 threads double the thread count of the Intel Core i5-14401E, and its quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface delivers 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure the Intel part does not report in the database. This combination makes the AMD processor the stronger choice for video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific computing, and any task that scales across many cores or depends on fast memory access. The Radeon 8065S integrated graphics also gives it a substantial advantage in GPU-accelerated workloads without a discrete card, whereas the Intel chip ships with UHD Graphics 730.

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in platform flexibility and raw single-thread clock speed considerations. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders the option to reuse older DDR4 modules or adopt newer DDR5 kits. Its PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides twice the per-lane bandwidth of the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 connection, which matters for high-end graphics cards and NVMe storage. The Intel chip's 2.50 GHz base clock rises to 4.70 GHz boost, and while the AMD part boosts higher at 5.20 GHz, the Intel processor's 6-core design with a 65 W TDP suits lighter multi-threaded duties and single-thread-responsive applications where its recorded Cinebench single-core scores apply directly.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO (Zen 5) generation. It is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process and uses a chiplet design with two 70.6 mm² dies. The Intel Core i5-14401E belongs to the Core 14th Gen series with the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Intel fabricates this chip on its own 10 nm process, and the die measures 215 mm² as a monolithic design. The process node difference is significant: AMD's 4 nm TSMC process allows for a denser, more power-efficient transistor layout compared to Intel's 10 nm node, which helps explain how AMD packs 16 cores into a 55 W TDP envelope.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. Both processors allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD part provides 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel chip offers 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache sees the largest gap: AMD's 64 MB shared L3 dwarfs Intel's 20 MB shared L3. This 3.2x difference in L3 capacity gives the AMD processor a significant edge in workloads with large working sets that fit into cache, reducing repeated main-memory accesses. The Intel chip's smaller L3 is partially offset by its higher per-core L2 allocation, but for most multi-threaded scenarios the AMD part's larger pool wins.

Memory architecture also separates these two. AMD uses LPDDR5X exclusively with a quad-channel bus and a recorded 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and the database lists no bandwidth figure for it. ECC memory support appears on both processors. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. PCIe generation differs as well: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, and Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part's integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 730, while the AMD part features the Radeon 8065S, a much more capable iGPU for gaming and compute tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 boosts to 5.20 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14401E boosts to 4.70 GHz.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core i5-14401E support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports LPDDR5X memory only. The Intel Core i5-14401E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: How does the L3 cache differ between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14401E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the production status of each processor?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core i5-14401E are listed as Active in production status.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 | Intel Core i5-14401E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 16 | 6 |

| Threads | 32 | 12 |

| Base clock | 3.10 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.20 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP11 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Halo | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO (Zen 5) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 64 MB | 20 MB shared |

| Memory support | LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 273.1 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 8065S | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-05-19 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part number | 100-000002124 | Q49JSRNJS |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core i5-14401E. The AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores or average score in the database, and its percentile rank sits at 50 across all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14401E, by contrast, has a full set of Cinebench results and an average benchmark score of 5253, placing it in the 60th percentile of all CPUs.

The Intel chip's recorded Cinebench scores establish a baseline for its performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 18161 multi-core and 2564 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 7627 multi-core and 1076 single-core. Cinebench R15 records 1830 multi-core and 258 single-core. These numbers indicate a capable mid-range desktop processor that performs best in single-threaded and lightly threaded tasks relative to its multi-thread output.

The AMD processor's specifications suggest substantially higher multi-threaded performance than the Intel chip, given its 16 cores, 32 threads, and 64 MB L3 cache. However, without recorded benchmark scores for the AMD part, the database cannot quantify the exact margin. The Intel chip's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 with an average score of 5259 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i7-11700B at 5241 with a delta of 0.2%, the Intel Core i9-10850K at 5240 with a delta of 0.2%, and the Intel Core i5-13400T at 5210 with a delta of 0.8%. These deltas show the Core i5-14401E sits within a tight performance band around its peers, with its average score within 0.8% of the nearest recorded rival.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload and platform. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is the choice for users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, large cache capacity, and high memory bandwidth in a mobile form factor. Its 16 cores, 32 threads, 64 MB L3, and 273.1 GB/s quad-channel LPDDR5X memory make it suited for rendering, compilation, data processing, and other parallel workloads. The Radeon 8065S integrated graphics adds significant GPU capability without a discrete card.

The Intel Core i5-14401E suits desktop builders who prefer DDR4 or DDR5 memory compatibility, need PCIe Gen 5 for the fastest storage and graphics, and prioritize single-thread responsiveness over raw core counts. Its recorded Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18161 and single-core score of 2564 demonstrate solid mainstream desktop performance, and its position in the 60th percentile with a 5253 average benchmark score places it slightly above the AMD part's 50th percentile rank, though the AMD part has no recorded scores to compare directly. The 10 nm Intel process and monolithic 215 mm² die contrast with AMD's 4 nm TSMC chiplet design, but the Intel chip's desktop socket and dual-channel memory flexibility offer a different set of advantages. Users with heavily parallel workloads and a need for high memory bandwidth should favor the AMD processor, while those building a flexible desktop system with PCIe Gen 5 and DDR4/DDR5 memory options should consider the Intel Core i5-14401E.