AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495

CORE STATE Gorgon Halo
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Halo
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14701TE

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
1,716
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
242
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
7,154
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,010
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
17,035
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
2,405
passmark_data_compression
N/A
220,520
passmark_data_encryption
N/A
11,699
passmark_extended_instructions
N/A
14,354
passmark_find_prime_numbers
N/A
143
passmark_floating_point_math
N/A
50,219
passmark_integer_math
N/A
65,792
passmark_multithread
N/A
20,042
passmark_physics
N/A
1,860
passmark_random_string_sorting
N/A
22,760
passmark_single_thread
N/A
2,637
passmark_singlethread
N/A
2,637

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i7-14701TE

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and Intel Core i7-14701TE occupy distinct positions in the processor landscape, with the database showing a clear split between the AMD part’s mobile-first design and the Intel part’s desktop-oriented architecture. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark suites, placing it at the 78th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 currently has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. This analysis relies solely on the recorded data, which includes a full benchmark profile for the Intel chip and architectural specifications for both.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the only processor in this comparison with measured performance data, so it wins every benchmark category where scores exist. In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel chip delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17035, which indicates strong parallel processing capability for tasks like video rendering or software compilation. Its single-core performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2405, showing that it handles lightly threaded applications such as web browsing or office productivity with ease.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no benchmark entries in the database, meaning its wins cannot be quantified through recorded measurements. However, the specification data suggests where it would compete effectively. The AMD chip uses 16 cores and 32 threads, double the Intel part’s 8 cores and 16 threads, which would likely give it an advantage in heavily parallel workloads if benchmarked. The AMD processor also features 64 MB of L3 cache, compared to the Intel chip’s 33 MB shared L3 cache, potentially benefiting data-intensive tasks. The Intel part’s recorded PassMark scores show specific strengths: a multi-thread score of 20042, a single-thread score of 2637, and a physics score of 1860, all indicating solid general-purpose performance. The AMD chip’s memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s, enabled by quad-channel LPDDR5X support, far exceeds the Intel part’s unspecified bandwidth with dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, which would favor the AMD chip in memory-bound scenarios.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, using the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Halo. It belongs to the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO generation and targets the mobile market segment, fitting into the AMD Socket FP11. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses Intel’s 10 nm process, employs the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. It is a desktop part designed for Intel Socket 1700.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The AMD chip provides 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel chip provides 8 cores and 16 threads. Both processors share the same L1 cache size at 80 KB per core, but the L2 cache differs: the AMD part has 1 MB per core, while the Intel part has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache totals 64 MB for the AMD chip versus 33 MB shared for the Intel chip. The AMD processor uses a dual-die design with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm², while the Intel processor uses a monolithic die of 257 mm². The AMD chip’s process node at 4 nm is smaller than Intel’s 10 nm node, which typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency.

Memory architecture provides another contrast. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, delivering 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory, which is notable for reliability-focused workloads. The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD chip includes Radeon 8065S, while the Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 770. PCIe support varies as well, with the AMD part offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel part offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), giving the Intel chip a newer PCIe generation for potential expansion bandwidth.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmark scores, the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the Intel Core i7-14701TE’s measured results. The database lists 17 benchmark entries for the Intel chip, covering Cinebench and Passmark tests. In Cinebench R15, the Intel chip scores 1716 in multi-core and 242 in single-core. Moving to Cinebench R20, the scores are 7154 for multi-core and 1010 for single-core. The Cinebench R23 results show 17035 for multi-core and 2405 for single-core. These figures indicate a consistent scaling pattern across Cinebench versions, with the multi-core scores reflecting the 8-core, 16-thread configuration.

The Passmark suite provides a broader view of the Intel chip’s capabilities. The multi-thread score is 20042, while the single-thread score is 2637. Specific workload tests reveal targeted strengths: integer math scores 65792, floating point math scores 50219, and extended instructions scores 14354. Data compression achieves 220520, data encryption achieves 11699, and random string sorting achieves 22760. The physics test scores 1860, and the find prime numbers test scores 143. These numbers show the Intel chip performing well across diverse computational tasks, from encryption to sorting. The nearest rivals in the database, all AMD parts, provide context: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 25981, which is 0.1% below the Intel chip’s average benchmark score of 26013. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 26106, which is 0.4% above, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, which is 0.7% above. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE scores 25880, which is 0.5% below. These deltas place the Intel chip in a tight competitive band with these AMD mobile processors, despite the Intel part being a desktop design.

Specification Differences

The specification table shows several fields where the two processors differ directly. Core count differs: 16 cores for the AMD chip versus 8 cores for the Intel chip. Thread count follows at 32 versus 16. Base clock speeds differ, with the AMD chip at 3.10 GHz and the Intel chip at 2.10 GHz, while boost clocks are identical at 5.20 GHz for both. The TDP values are close but not equal: 55 for the AMD chip and 45 for the Intel chip. The sockets are incompatible, with AMD Socket FP11 for the AMD part and Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part. Process nodes differ: 4 nm for the AMD chip and 10 nm for the Intel chip. The foundries also differ, with TSMC for AMD and Intel for Intel.

Cache specifications show differences in L2 and L3. The L1 cache is the same at 80 KB per core, but the L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 64 MB for AMD versus 33 MB shared for Intel. Memory support differs, with the AMD chip using LPDDR5X and the Intel chip using DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bus widths differ, with quad-channel for AMD and dual-channel for Intel. The memory bandwidth for the AMD chip is recorded as 273.1 GB/s, while no figure exists for the Intel chip. The PCIe support differs: Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD, Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 8065S for AMD versus UHD Graphics 770 for Intel. The market segment differs, with the AMD chip classified as Mobile and the Intel chip as Desktop. Release dates differ, with the AMD chip released on 2026-05-19 and the Intel chip on 2024-06-30. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they do not support overclocking. The part numbers also differ: 100-000002124 for AMD and Q49GSRNJL for Intel.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of both processors?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core i7-14701TE have a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14701TE compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel chip has an average benchmark score of 26013. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 25981, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 26106, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE scores 25880, which is 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, which is 0.7% higher.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 64 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core i7-14701TE support ECC memory.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI Max+ PRO 495
i7-14701TE
Core Specs
Cores
16
8 -50.0%
Threads
32
16 -50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.1
2.1 -32.3%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.2 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.1
2.1 -32.3%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.2 0.0%
Multiplier
31
21 -32.3%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
55
45 -18.2%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
115 W
Configurable TDP
45-120 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
—
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Halo
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO (Zen 5)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Quad-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
273.1 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP11
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
P-Core Turbo
—
5.2 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 55 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 8065S
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000002124
Q49GSRNJL
Package
FC-BGA
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 Details View Core i7-14701TE Details