AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i5-14450HX Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495
Core i5-14450HX
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i5-14450HX
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data splits cleanly between the two processors, but only one of them actually has benchmark scores in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 ships with no recorded benchmark entries, a zero average benchmark score, and a percentile of 50 among all CPUs tracked. The Intel Core i5-14450HX, by contrast, carries 17 benchmark results across Cinebench and Passmark workloads, an average score of 32040, and a percentile of 82.
That asymmetry defines the use-case split. The Intel part wins every measured workload category because it is the only part with measurements. In multi-threaded rendering, the i5-14450HX posts 20108 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 8445 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. In single-threaded tasks, it records 2838 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1191 in Cinebench R20 single-core. For data processing, Passmark shows 278538 in data compression, 15574 in data encryption, and 17207 in extended instructions. For mathematical workloads, it delivers 58037 in floating point math and 78330 in integer math. For memory or sorting tasks, it scores 29565 in random string sorting. For physics simulation, the score is 1475.
The AMD part, despite its 16 cores and 32 threads versus Intel's 10 cores and 16 threads, has no recorded wins because no benchmark results exist in the database for it. The data indicates that the Intel i5-14450HX is the only processor here with verified performance numbers, so any use-case allocation based on measurements must assign all wins to Intel. The AMD chip's higher core count and thread count suggest potential for multi-threaded workloads, but the database contains no scores to confirm that potential.
The Verdict
From the data as recorded, the Intel Core i5-14450HX is the only processor with any performance evidence. Its percentile of 82 places it above 82 percent of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 sits at percentile 50 with no average score. The Intel part's nearest rivals, all within 0.6 percent of its average score, are the Intel Core i7-13705H at 32076 (0.1 percent lower), the Intel Core i5-14400 at 32115 (0.2 percent lower), the Intel Core i7-12800H at 32121 (0.3 percent lower), and the Intel Core i9-11900 at 32226 (0.6 percent lower). This means the i5-14450HX sits in a tightly packed performance cluster, essentially tied with those four chips.
For anyone choosing based on measured data, the Intel part is the defensible pick. It delivers verified scores across rendering, math, encryption, compression, and single-thread tests. The AMD chip offers more cores (16 versus 10), more threads (32 versus 16), a higher boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 4.80 GHz), and a larger L3 cache (64 MB versus 20 MB), but none of those specifications translate into recorded benchmark results. The database shows no wins for AMD, no average score, and no rival comparisons. Therefore, the verdict from the data is straightforward: the Intel Core i5-14450HX is the only processor with demonstrated performance, and it holds a high percentile ranking among all CPUs.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
Because the head-to-head benchmark array is empty and the AMD processor has no benchmark entries, the comparison relies entirely on the Intel i5-14450HX's recorded scores. The largest wins for Intel, in absolute terms, are in multi-threaded rendering and data compression. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20108 is the highest single number in the dataset, followed by the Passmark data compression score of 278538. These two results indicate strong parallel throughput and data handling capability.
In single-threaded tests, the i5-14450HX records 2838 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 285 in Cinebench R15 single-core. The Passmark single-thread score is 3643. These numbers, while lower than the multi-threaded results, still represent the only single-thread measurements available. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8445 and the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2026 round out the rendering suite.
For mathematical workloads, the Passmark integer math score of 78330 exceeds the floating point math score of 58037, suggesting stronger integer performance. The extended instructions score of 17207 and the find prime numbers score of 98 show the i5-14450HX handles specialized instruction sets and prime number calculations, though the prime number score is notably low compared to other metrics. The random string sorting score of 29565 and the multithread score of 23680 complete the Passmark set. Data encryption at 15574 and physics at 1475 are the remaining recorded results.
Since the AMD chip has no scores, every one of these numbers represents a win for Intel by default. The data cannot show any AMD advantage because no AMD measurements exist. The largest margin, if one were to compare against a hypothetical zero, would be the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20108 and the Passmark data compression score of 278538, but the database does not provide a basis for such a comparison beyond the absence of AMD data.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX has 10 cores and 16 threads.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?
A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX has an average benchmark score of 32040. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no benchmark entries recorded.
Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14450HX compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The i5-14450HX is 0.1 percent ahead of the Intel Core i7-13705H, 0.2 percent ahead of the Intel Core i5-14400, 0.3 percent ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H, and 0.6 percent ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900.
Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.
Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?
A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX ranks in the 82nd percentile, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 ranks in the 50th percentile.
Q: What memory types do the two processors support?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO generation built on Zen 5. Its process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14450HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series. Its process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel.
The cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core but doubles the L2 cache to 2 MB per core, while its L3 cache is 20 MB shared across the chip. The die size reflects this difference: the AMD part measures 2x 70.6 mm², while the Intel part measures 257 mm².
Memory architecture also diverges. The AMD processor supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, and no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. Both processors support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
Integrated graphics distinguish the two as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 includes Radeon 8065S graphics, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX includes UHD Graphics 710. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the AMD part does not. Production status for both is listed as Active. The AMD part's part number is 100-000002124, and the Intel part's part number is SRMXK.
Specification Differences
The recorded specifications show clear divergence in several fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a base clock of 3.10 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i5-14450HX's base clock of 2.40 GHz. The boost clock also favors AMD at 5.20 GHz versus Intel's 4.80 GHz. Both processors share a TDP of 55 watts.
The socket types differ: AMD uses AMD Socket FP11, while Intel uses Intel BGA 1964. The core counts differ as noted: 16 cores and 32 threads for AMD, 10 cores and 16 threads for Intel. The process node differs: 4 nm for AMD (TSMC foundry) versus 10 nm for Intel (Intel foundry). The L2 cache per core is 1 MB for AMD and 2 MB for Intel, while the L3 cache is 64 MB for AMD and 20 MB for Intel.
Memory support differs: LPDDR5X for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. The memory bus is quad-channel for AMD and dual-channel for Intel. Memory bandwidth is 273.1 GB/s for AMD and not recorded for Intel. PCIe generation differs: Gen 4 for AMD versus Gen 5 for Intel, both with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are Radeon 8065S for AMD and UHD Graphics 710 for Intel. The multiplier is locked for AMD and unlocked for Intel. Release dates differ: the AMD part is dated 2026-05-19, and the Intel part is dated 2024-01-07. The Intel part has a series designation of Core 14th Gen, while the AMD part has no series listed.