AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core 3 305 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and Intel Core 3 305 target different ends of the mobile processor spectrum. The AMD part is a 16-core, 32-thread flagship built for sustained heavy workloads, while the Intel chip is a 6-core, 6-thread efficient design for mainstream tasks. The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core 3 305, but no recorded scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495, so direct numerical comparisons are impossible. The analysis below relies on the architectural specifications and the Intel chip's measured performance relative to its rivals.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is the clear choice for users who need massive parallel processing capability. Its 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with a 64 MB L3 cache and quad-channel LPDDR5X memory, position it for multi-threaded applications such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing. The Intel Core 3 305, with its 6 cores and 6 threads, targets lighter workloads where power efficiency and adequate single-thread performance matter more. Its 15 W TDP and single-channel memory make it suitable for thin-and-light laptops focused on battery life. The Intel chip sits at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 18302, placing it near the Intel Core i3-14100, which scores 18318, a difference of -0.1%. The AMD part, lacking recorded benchmarks, cannot be positioned in the same percentile ranking.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 wins in scenarios that scale with core count. With 32 threads, it handles parallel workloads far beyond the Intel chip's 6 threads. The AMD processor also provides a 64 MB L3 cache, which reduces memory latency for large datasets, and a memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s via quad-channel LPDDR5X, which is critical for integrated graphics and data-intensive tasks. The Radeon 8065S integrated graphics, paired with that high bandwidth, gives the AMD part a substantial advantage in graphics workloads.

The Intel Core 3 305 wins in efficiency-oriented use cases. Its 15 W TDP is significantly lower than the AMD's 55 W TDP, allowing for smaller chassis designs and longer battery life. The Intel chip's measured Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13123 shows it handles everyday productivity tasks competently. Its single-thread performance, indicated by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1852, is strong for a 6-core part at this power level. The Intel chip also supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, offering flexibility in system design, though only in a single-channel configuration.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO generation based on Zen 5 cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB L3. Memory support is LPDDR5X only, via a quad-channel bus providing 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. The processor uses AMD Socket FP11 and has Gen 4 PCIe with 16 lanes available for the CPU.

The Intel Core 3 305 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by Intel. The cache configuration is 192 KB L1, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but only through a single-channel bus, yielding 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. The processor uses Intel BGA 1516 and has Gen 4 PCIe with 6 lanes. The integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core, a much smaller implementation than AMD's Radeon 8065S.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 3 305 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare?

A: The AMD part offers 273.1 GB/s through a quad-channel LPDDR5X bus. The Intel part offers 59.7 GB/s through a single-channel bus supporting DDR5 or LPDDR5X.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a TDP of 55 W. The Intel Core 3 305 has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 305 support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported on the Intel Core 3 305. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 does support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD chip is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel chip is built on a 3 nm process by Intel.

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 305 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 scores 18302 on average. The Intel Core i3-14100 scores 18318, which is 0.1% higher. The Intel Core 5 330 scores 18345, 0.2% higher. The Intel Core 7 360 scores 18374, 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600E scores 18230, which is 0.4% lower.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and Intel Core 3 305 are not available in the database, as the AMD part has no recorded scores. The Intel chip's measured results provide context for what a 6-core, 6-thread processor at 15 W can achieve. In Cinebench R23, the Intel Core 3 305 scores 13123 in multi-core and 1852 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 5511 multi-core and 777 single-core. In Cinebench R15, the scores are 1322 multi-core and 186 single-core.

PassMark results for the Intel Core 3 305 show 15439 in multithread, 3977 in single-thread, 146857 in data compression, 11019 in data encryption, 13543 in extended instructions, 115 in find prime numbers, 42284 in floating point math, 32295 in integer math, 1233 in physics, and 17623 in random string sorting. These numbers indicate a balanced performer for everyday tasks. The AMD part, with 32 threads, would theoretically scale much higher in multi-threaded tests like Cinebench R23 multi-core and PassMark multithread, but no evidence exists in the database to quantify that advantage.

The nearest rival data for the Intel Core 3 305 shows its competitive position. It trails the Intel Core 7 360 by 0.4%, with the latter scoring 18374. It also trails the Intel Core 5 330 by 0.2%, which scores 18345. Against the Intel Core i3-14100, the difference is a negligible 0.1%, with the i3-14100 scoring 18318. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600E is the only rival the Intel chip beats, with the Intel part scoring 0.4% higher than the AMD's 18230. These deltas are all within a narrow band, suggesting the Intel Core 3 305 delivers performance consistent with its direct competitors.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and Intel Core 3 305 differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD chip has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel chip has 6 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks are 3.10 GHz for AMD and 1.50 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz for AMD and 4.30 GHz for Intel. The TDP is 55 W for AMD and 15 W for Intel.

Cache structures vary significantly. AMD uses 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB L3. Intel uses 192 KB L1 total, 2.5 MB L2 total, and 6 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: AMD supports only LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bus width is quad-channel for AMD and single-channel for Intel. Memory bandwidth is 273.1 GB/s for AMD and 59.7 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory is supported on AMD but not on Intel.

Process technology and packaging differ as well. AMD uses a 4 nm TSMC process with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². Intel uses a 3 nm Intel process with no recorded die size. Sockets are AMD Socket FP11 for the AMD chip and Intel BGA 1516 for the Intel chip. PCIe configuration provides 16 Gen 4 lanes for AMD and 6 Gen 4 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 8065S for AMD and Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe for Intel.

Release dates are close, with the Intel Core 3 305 released on April 15, 2026, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 released on May 19, 2026. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $309, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part number is SAE3L, and the AMD part number is 100-000002124. The Intel chip is in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip is in the 50th percentile, though this percentile is based on no benchmark scores and should be treated as uninformative.