AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core 3 305 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen 5 130 contains no benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 3 305 has a complete set of measurements. This asymmetry shapes the entire comparison: the database has direct performance evidence for the Intel part, while the AMD chip's entry shows a placeholder average score of 0. The Intel Core 3 305 achieves an average benchmark score of 18,302, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs tracked. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded average score, meaning the database cannot confirm any performance parity or advantage for the AMD part at this time.

Looking at the Intel Core 3 305's individual results, the multi-threaded Cinebench scores show a consistent pattern. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 1,322 points. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the score reaches 5,511, and in Cinebench R23 multi-core, it delivers 13,123. Single-core results follow: 186 in Cinebench R15, 777 in Cinebench R20, and 1,852 in Cinebench R23. These numbers indicate a processor that scales well across different rendering workloads, with the R23 multi-core result being roughly ten times the single-core figure, a typical ratio for a six-thread part.

PassMark results for the Intel chip cover a broader range of tasks. The multi-thread score is 15,439, while single-thread performance measures 3,977. Integer math reaches 32,295, floating-point math hits 42,284, and the extended instructions test records 13,543. Data compression scores 146,857, data encryption 11,019, and random string sorting 17,623. Physics simulation posts 1,233, and prime number finding scores 115. The floating-point math result being higher than integer math suggests the architecture handles FP-heavy workloads efficiently, which matters for scientific and rendering applications.

Since the Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded benchmarks, there are no head-to-head wins for either side in the database. The Intel Core 3 305's nearest rivals provide context: the Intel Core i3-14100 scores 18,318 and is 0.1% ahead, the Intel Core 5 330 scores 18,345 and is 0.2% ahead, the Intel Core 7 360 scores 18,374 and is 0.4% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 5 2600E scores 18,230 and is 0.4% behind. The Intel Core 3 305 sits in a tight cluster with these four chips, all within a 0.8% spread. This positions the Intel part as a solid mid-range mobile processor, but the AMD Ryzen 5 130 cannot be compared directly due to missing data.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 305 demonstrates clear strengths in every measured category because it is the only one with data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,123 places it near the Core i3-14100, which is only 0.1% faster overall. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,977 indicates responsive day-to-day operation, and the data compression score of 146,857 shows strong throughput for archive and storage workloads. The floating-point math result of 42,284 suggests good performance in numerical simulations, while the integer math score of 32,295 covers general productivity tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no benchmark wins recorded because no scores exist in the database. Its configuration suggests potential advantages in theory: it offers 12 threads versus the Intel chip's 6, which could benefit heavily threaded workloads if the architecture scales well. However, the database contains no evidence to confirm this. The Ryzen 5 130 also supports ECC memory, which the Intel Core 3 305 does not, and its dual-channel memory bus could provide bandwidth advantages in memory-sensitive tasks. These are architectural facts, not measured results, so they cannot be treated as confirmed wins.

For use-case analysis, the Intel Core 3 305's recorded data supports productivity, rendering, and mixed workloads. The Cinebench results confirm it can handle multi-threaded rendering tasks, and the PassMark suite covers encryption, compression, and math operations. The AMD part's lack of data means no use case can be assigned to it with confidence. A builder considering these two chips would have to rely on the Intel part's verified performance, while the AMD chip remains an unknown quantity in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in architecture. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 3 305 uses the Wildcat Lake codename on Intel's 3 nm process. The process node difference is substantial: 6 nm versus 3 nm, which typically affects power efficiency and transistor density, though the database does not provide transistor counts for either chip.

Core and thread counts differ. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, using simultaneous multithreading. The Intel part has 6 cores and 6 threads, with no hyper-threading support. This gives the AMD chip twice as many logical threads, though the Intel chip compensates with a higher base clock in some respects. The AMD base clock is 2.90 GHz with a boost of 4.55 GHz. The Intel base clock is 1.50 GHz with a boost of 4.30 GHz. The AMD chip has a higher base and boost clock, but the Intel chip's 3 nm process may allow different power behavior.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has 192 KB of total L1, 2.5 MB of total L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD part's larger L3 cache could benefit workloads with high cache reuse, while the Intel part's smaller cache may be sufficient for its six threads. The die size for the AMD chip is 210 mm², while the Intel chip's die size is not recorded.

Memory support shows a clear split. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core 3 305 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X on a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s. The AMD chip's dual-channel configuration gives it 28.6% more theoretical bandwidth, and it also supports ECC memory, which the Intel chip does not. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well, with the AMD part using Radeon 660M and the Intel part using Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core.

Power consumption and packaging also separate the two. The AMD chip has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel chip has a 15 W TDP. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1516. The release dates show the AMD chip launched in September 2025, while the Intel chip launched in April 2026. The Intel chip has a recorded launch MSRP of $309, while the AMD chip has no MSRP in the database. Both processors are active in production, both have locked multipliers, and both target the mobile market segment.

The Verdict

The data supports selecting the Intel Core 3 305 for anyone who needs verified performance. Its average benchmark score of 18,302 places it in the 72nd percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of its score. The Cinebench and PassMark results provide a complete picture of its capabilities across rendering, math, compression, and encryption. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded benchmarks, so the database cannot confirm any performance level for it. Its 50th percentile placement with an average score of 0 reflects the absence of data, not a measured result.

The Intel part's advantages are concrete: 3 nm process, verified multi-thread and single-thread scores, and a 15 W TDP that suits thin-and-light mobile designs. Its single-channel memory and 6 MB L3 cache are limitations, but the recorded performance shows these do not prevent strong results. The AMD part's theoretical advantages include 12 threads, dual-channel memory, ECC support, and a larger L3 cache, but none of these are backed by measurements in the database. The 28 W TDP also suggests higher power draw, which matters for battery life in mobile systems.

Choosing between these two should follow the evidence. The Intel Core 3 305 has a full benchmark profile and a clear performance standing. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 remains unmeasured, so any decision favoring it would rest on specifications alone. The database's recorded data favors the Intel part without qualification.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 has an average benchmark score of 18,302. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmarks.

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 305 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100 is 0.1% faster, the Intel Core 5 330 is 0.2% faster, the Intel Core 7 360 is 0.4% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 5 2600E is 0.4% slower.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 3 305 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 3 305 does not.

Q: What memory buses do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses a dual-channel memory bus with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 3 305 uses a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core 3 305 has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: What are the boost clocks for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 boosts to 4.55 GHz. The Intel Core 3 305 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 305 have a recorded launch MSRP?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 3 305 has a launch MSRP of $309. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no MSRP listed in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 130 | Intel Core 3 305 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 6 |

| Threads | 12 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.55 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Wildcat Lake |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB total |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 2.5 MB total |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |

| Release Date | September 2025 | April 2026 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $309 |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | Not listed |

| Production Status | Active | Active |