AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i
Core 5 213PE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 5 213PE
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data for this comparison is asymmetrical. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no benchmark records in the database, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results. This means the head-to-head analysis is based entirely on the Intel part's measured performance and its position relative to other CPUs in the database, rather than a direct side-by-side measurement.
The Intel Core 5 213PE delivers an average benchmark score of 35428. Its percentile rank against all CPUs in the database is 85, indicating that the recorded results place it above the vast majority of processors tracked. The nearest rivals in the database provide context for this score. The Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403, which is 0.1% lower. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365, 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, 0.4% lower. The Core 5 213PE sits at the top of this small cluster, though the margins are slim.
Looking at the individual benchmark results for the Intel Core 5 213PE, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 22468, while the single-core score is 3172. The ratio between these scores shows strong scaling across cores. In Cinebench R20, the multicore result is 9436 and the single-core result is 1332. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 2264 and the single-core score is 319. The progression from R15 to R23 shows consistent behavior across workload versions.
The PassMark suite for the Intel Core 5 213PE includes several specialized tests. The data compression score is 298804, which is the highest single value recorded for this processor. Data encryption scores 15916. Extended instructions score 19565. The prime number search test scores 114. Floating point math scores 68587. Integer math scores 92089. The multithread score is 26434. Physics scores 1624. Random string sorting scores 32027. The single-thread score is 4060, recorded twice in the database with identical values.
The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 2.70 GHz and its boost clock is 5.20 GHz. The thermal design power is 65 watts. These specifications align with the measured performance, as the boost clock is among the higher values in its segment. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and belongs to the Bartlett Lake codename family, within the Core 5 generation.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Its thermal design power is 28 watts. The database contains no benchmark records for this processor, so no measured scores are available for comparison. Its percentile rank against all CPUs is 50, which reflects the absence of recorded performance data rather than a measured position. The average benchmark score is 0, confirming that no test results have been entered.
Without recorded benchmark data for the AMD part, the head-to-head comparison cannot show which processor wins in any specific test. The Intel part has measurable results, and the AMD part does not. Any conclusion about relative performance would require speculation beyond the recorded facts.
The Verdict
The data supports a clear outcome for one side. The Intel Core 5 213PE has comprehensive recorded performance across multiple benchmark suites, with an average score of 35428 and a percentile rank of 85. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.4% of its average score, are established desktop processors from the Core i7 and i5 families. The Core 5 213PE edges each of them by a small margin.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark results. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile rank of 50 is a default position, not a measured one. The database cannot confirm any performance advantage for this processor, despite its higher core count of 12 versus 8, its 24 threads versus 16, and its lower thermal design power of 28 watts versus 65.
The launch MSRP of the Intel Core 5 213PE is $221. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no listed launch MSRP in the database.
For buyers or system integrators relying on measured data, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the only option with verified results. The AMD processor may offer architectural advantages on paper, but the database contains no evidence of its real-world performance. The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the Intel Core 5 213PE is the processor with demonstrated capability, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i remains unverified in this database.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 213PE?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has an average benchmark score of 35428.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has an average benchmark score of 0, and the database contains no benchmark records for it.
Q: How does the Intel Core 5 213PE compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PE is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700T, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700KF, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600T, and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700K.
Q: What is the percentile rank of the Intel Core 5 213PE?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PE ranks in the 85th percentile against all CPUs in the database.
Q: What is the percentile rank of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i ranks in the 50th percentile against all CPUs in the database, with no recorded benchmark scores.
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across several specification fields in the database.
The core counts differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD part offers 50% more cores and 50% more threads.
The clock speeds differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core 5 213PE has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part has the higher base clock by 0.70 GHz and the higher boost clock by 0.10 GHz.
The thermal design power differs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is rated at 28 watts. The Intel Core 5 213PE is rated at 65 watts. The AMD part uses substantially less power.
The sockets differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses Intel Socket 1700.
The process nodes differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 5 213PE is fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel.
The cache configurations differ. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 213PE has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has more L2 per core and more total L3.
The memory support differs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core 5 213PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The memory bandwidth differs: the AMD part is rated at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part is rated at 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory.
The PCIe capabilities differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.
The integrated graphics differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i includes Radeon 890M graphics. The Intel Core 5 213PE includes UHD Graphics 730.
The market segments differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is classified as a mobile processor. The Intel Core 5 213PE is classified as a desktop processor.
The release dates differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a release date of 2026-02-28. The Intel Core 5 213PE has a release date of 2026-03-08. Both processors are marked as active in production status. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.
The die size is listed only for the AMD part at 233 mm². The Intel part has no die size recorded. The Intel part has a part number of SA4QG, while the AMD part has an unknown part number.
Architecture Differences
The architectural details in the database show clear distinctions between the two processors.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i belongs to the Gorgon Point codename family, within the Ryzen AI Embedded generation that uses Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 5 213PE belongs to the Bartlett Lake codename family, within the Core 5 generation.
The manufacturing processes reflect different foundry choices. The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel processor uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD part has a die size of 233 mm². The Intel part has no die size recorded in the database.
The cache hierarchy differs in structure. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The Intel part doubles the per-core L2 allocation and has 8 MB more L3 cache overall.
The memory controllers differ. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The AMD part supports the faster LPDDR5X standard and has a higher rated bandwidth.
The I/O capabilities differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part provides the newer PCIe standard.
The integrated graphics solutions are different. The AMD part uses Radeon 890M graphics, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores for either processor.
The power characteristics reflect different design targets. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a 28 watt TDP, consistent with its mobile classification. The Intel Core 5 213PE has a 65 watt TDP, consistent with its desktop classification.
Where Each One Wins
The benchmark data assigns every recorded win to the Intel Core 5 213PE, simply because it is the only processor in this comparison with recorded results. The Intel part shows strengths across Cinebench and PassMark workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22468 indicates strong multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3172 indicates solid single-thread capability. The PassMark data compression score of 298804 is the standout result, showing particularly strong performance in compression workloads. The integer math score of 92089 and floating point math score of 68587 both indicate robust compute throughput. The multithread score of 26434 reinforces the multi-core capability.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark wins. The database shows no measured results for any test, so no use-case advantage can be confirmed from the data. The specification sheet suggests certain strengths: the 12-core, 24-thread configuration with a 28 watt TDP indicates efficiency-focused design, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is higher than the Intel part's 76.8 GB/s. The Radeon 890M integrated graphics and support for LPDDR5X memory point toward a mobile-oriented feature set. The 4 nm TSMC process node indicates a modern manufacturing approach. However, none of these specifications are backed by recorded benchmark scores.
For workloads where benchmark results exist, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the processor with demonstrated capability. Its position in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals within 0.4% of its average score, places it among established high-performing desktop processors. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i remains without measured evidence in the database, so any claims about its performance in specific workloads are unsupported by the recorded data.