AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H are both active mobile processors, but the data shows them occupying different performance niches. The AMD part delivers a 93rd percentile ranking across all CPUs, while the Intel chip sits at the 84th percentile. Their average benchmark scores diverge significantly, with the AMD at 62839 and the Intel at 34485.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the stronger overall processor for sustained multi-threaded workloads. Its average benchmark score of 62839 is roughly 82% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H's 34485. The AMD part also holds a commanding 93rd percentile versus the Intel's 84th, placing it in a different performance tier entirely. For users whose tasks scale with thread count, integer math, or data compression, the AMD chip is the clear choice based on the numbers.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is not without its own strengths. It wins six of the eleven head-to-head benchmark comparisons, including the single-thread test by a narrow margin. Its physics score is notably higher, and it demonstrates superiority in prime number finding and floating-point math. This makes it the better option for workloads that are latency-sensitive, single-threaded, or involve heavy floating-point calculations. The data suggests a user prioritizing single-core responsiveness or specific math-heavy applications would prefer the Intel part.

The AMD wins five of the eleven head-to-head tests, but its victories are decisive in key areas. The 89.8% lead in integer math is substantial, and the 33.6% lead in data compression is also significant. The Intel wins are often by smaller margins, with the exception of its 56.9% lead in prime number finding. The overall picture is that the AMD offers a higher ceiling for throughput, while the Intel provides more balanced, if lower, peak performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result in the entire comparison is in the passmark_integer_math test. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 117832, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H manages 62070. This 89.8% delta is the single largest win for either processor and underscores the AMD's efficiency in basic arithmetic operations, likely a result of its architecture's design priorities.

Data compression is another clear AMD victory. Its score of 374429 beats the Intel's 280340 by 33.6%. This suggests the AMD is better suited for tasks involving file archives, database operations, or any workload that involves significant data movement and packing. The 17.9% win in random string sorting (40557 vs 34402) reinforces this pattern, showing an advantage in memory manipulation tasks.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H takes the passmark_find_prime_numbers test by a wide margin, scoring 299 against the AMD's 129, a 56.9% difference. This test is highly sensitive to single-thread performance and specific instruction efficiency. Similarly, the Intel wins the physics test with a score of 2682 versus 1772, a 33.9% lead, which indicates its superior performance in constraint-based simulation and rigid body dynamics.

Floating-point math is also an Intel stronghold. Its score of 82415 is 14.4% higher than the AMD's 70587. This is a significant advantage for scientific computing, 3D rendering, and any application relying heavily on decimal calculations. The Intel also edges out the AMD in data encryption, scoring 21291 versus 19612, a 7.9% difference.

The multi-thread test shows the AMD's overall throughput advantage. It scores 31817 compared to the Intel's 28545, an 11.5% win. This is a more moderate lead than the integer math result, suggesting that while the AMD is faster overall, the Intel's architecture is competitive in certain multi-threaded scenarios. In extended instructions, the AMD wins by 8.2% (26544 vs 24542), indicating its better handling of advanced SIMD operations. The single-thread test is nearly a tie, with the Intel winning by just 0.9% (4013 vs 3977).

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses Intel's 3 nm node. The AMD chip's codename is Gorgon Point, and its generation is identified as Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). The Intel part belongs to the Panther Lake architecture and is part of the Core Ultra Series 3, specifically the Panther Lake-H generation.

The core configurations differ fundamentally. The AMD processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, indicating it supports simultaneous multithreading. The Intel chip has 16 cores and 16 threads, meaning it does not. This explains why the AMD, despite having fewer physical cores, can perform competitively in multi-threaded benchmarks. The AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel runs at 1.90 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost.

Cache hierarchies are also distinct. The AMD allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a total of 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip provides 192 KB of L1 per core and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, with an 18 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel's larger L1 and L2 caches per core likely contribute to its strong single-thread performance, while the AMD's larger total L3 capacity (when considering its 12 cores) is a factor in its data-heavy wins. The AMD also supports ECC memory, a feature the Intel lacks.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket. The AMD has a TDP of 28, compared to the Intel's 25.

Memory bandwidth is a major differentiator. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H supports up to 115.2 GB/s, which is 28.7% higher than the AMD's 89.6 GB/s. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration. The higher bandwidth on the Intel part may explain its advantage in floating-point and physics tests, which are often memory-intensive.

PCIe support also differs. The AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel offers PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes. The Intel's newer PCIe standard offers higher per-lane bandwidth, but the AMD has more lanes available. The integrated graphics are the Radeon 890M on the AMD and Intel Xe3 Graphics on the Intel part. The Intel chip has a part number of SA4RD, while the AMD's part number is listed as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a significantly higher average benchmark score of 62839, compared to the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H's 34485.

Q: In which benchmark does the AMD have its largest win over the Intel?

A: The AMD's largest win is in passmark_integer_math, where it scores 117832 versus the Intel's 62070, a delta of 89.8%.

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H's biggest advantage?

A: The Intel's biggest advantage is in passmark_find_prime_numbers, where it scores 299 against the AMD's 129, a lead of 56.9%.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No, only the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H does not.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H boosts up to 4.60 GHz.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: The AMD has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel has 16 cores and 16 threads. The AMD supports simultaneous multithreading, the Intel does not.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the winner for throughput-oriented tasks. Its 89.8% lead in integer math makes it the obvious choice for general computation, data processing, and code compilation. The 33.6% win in data compression and the 17.9% win in random string sorting point to an advantage in file management, database operations, and server-side workloads. The 11.5% win in the multithread test and the 8.2% win in extended instructions further solidify its position for multi-core applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulation. Its 93rd percentile ranking and higher average score confirm its status as the more powerful processor overall.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the winner for specific, often latency-bound applications. Its 56.9% advantage in prime number finding indicates a strength in cryptographic and mathematical workloads that rely on single-thread speed. The 33.9% lead in physics makes it a better choice for real-time simulation, game physics, and certain engineering tools. The 14.4% win in floating-point math is relevant for financial modeling, audio processing, and scientific calculations that require high decimal precision. Its narrow 0.9% win in the single-thread test, while small, still gives it the edge in lightly threaded applications. The higher memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s supports its wins in memory-intensive tasks. For users who need maximum throughput, the AMD is the choice; for those with workloads that favor the Intel's specific strengths, the Intel part is the better fit.