AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core i7-14700 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core i7-14700

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a one-sided competitive picture across the shared PassMark test suite. The Intel Core i7-14700 wins all eleven head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 trailing by margins that range from modest to substantial. The closest contest is in single-thread performance, where the Intel part scores 4236 against the AMD part's 3977, a 6.1% deficit for the Ryzen AI Embedded P185. The extended instructions test also shows a relatively narrow gap, with Intel scoring 28388 versus AMD's 26544, a 6.5% difference. These two results indicate that the AMD processor holds its own in lightly threaded and instruction-heavy workloads, but it does not take the lead in any measured category.

The largest deltas appear in floating-point math and data encryption. In floating-point math, the Intel Core i7-14700 delivers 106716 points, which is 33.9% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185's 70587. Data encryption shows a 33.7% advantage for Intel, with scores of 29601 versus 19612. These are significant performance gaps, suggesting that the Intel processor has a clear edge in raw arithmetic throughput and cryptographic workloads. Integer math follows a similar pattern, with Intel scoring 154535 against AMD's 117832, a 23.8% difference. Data compression also favors Intel decisively, as the Core i7-14700 records 498198 points compared to the Ryzen AI Embedded P185's 374429, a 24.8% gap.

Multithreaded performance, a key metric for productivity and server-style tasks, further reinforces the Intel advantage. The Intel Core i7-14700 scores 40318 in the PassMark multithread test, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 31817, a 21.1% difference. Prime number finding shows a 21.3% gap (164 versus 129), and random string sorting shows a 25.4% gap (54340 versus 40557). Physics simulation, another heavily threaded workload, has Intel ahead by 20.4%, with scores of 2226 versus 1772. The overall average benchmark score confirms this hierarchy: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 averages 62839 points and sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i7-14700 averages 52301 points and sits in the 91st percentile. This is an unusual pairing, as the AMD part has a higher average score and percentile despite losing every direct head-to-head test, which reflects differences in the benchmark suites each processor was subjected to.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on the Zen 5 / Zen 5c microarchitecture. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process node at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i7-14700, in contrast, is a Raptor Lake Refresh part from the Core 14th Gen series, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's own foundry, with a die size of 257 mm². The smaller process node gives AMD a manufacturing density advantage, but the Intel chip compensates with a larger physical die and a more conventional core layout.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14700 has 20 cores and 28 threads. This eight-core, four-thread advantage for Intel is the primary driver of its multithreaded benchmark wins. Cache configurations also diverge. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while Intel doubles that to 2 MB per core. For L3 cache, the AMD processor provides 16 MB total, whereas the Intel processor offers 33 MB shared across the chip. The larger L3 cache on the Intel side likely contributes to its performance in data-heavy workloads like compression and sorting.

Memory support and platform connectivity reveal different target markets. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support. The Intel Core i7-14700 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, and includes ECC memory support as well, but the database records no bandwidth figure for it. PCIe connectivity differs by generation: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics also differ, with AMD offering a Radeon 890M and Intel providing UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part is classified as a mobile-market segment processor on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part is a desktop-market segment processor on Intel Socket 1700.

Clock speeds show a slight edge for Intel. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-14700 has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Thermal design power is dramatically different: the AMD part is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 65 watts. This power disparity explains why the AMD processor is aimed at embedded and mobile scenarios, whereas the Intel chip is a desktop part with more headroom for sustained performance. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiating factor.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score in the database?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 records 4236 points in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 6.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185's 3977 points.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multithreaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 scores 40318 in the PassMark multithread test, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 31817, giving Intel a 21.1% advantage.

Q: What is the difference in physical core counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14700 has 20 cores and 28 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the database records ECC memory support as true for both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and the Intel Core i7-14700.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is fabricated on a 4 nm node at TSMC, while the Intel Core i7-14700 uses a 10 nm node at Intel.

Q: What is the difference in thermal design power?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is rated at 28 watts TDP, whereas the Intel Core i7-14700 is rated at 65 watts TDP, a difference of 37 watts.

The Verdict

The benchmark data consistently favors the Intel Core i7-14700 across every direct comparison. All eleven head-to-head tests result in an Intel win, with deltas ranging from 6.1% in single-thread performance to 33.9% in floating-point math. The Intel processor also has a higher boost clock (5.40 GHz versus 5.10 GHz), more cores (20 versus 12), more threads (28 versus 24), and double the L2 cache per core (2 MB versus 1 MB), along with a larger shared L3 cache (33 MB versus 16 MB). These specifications align with its desktop market segment and 65-watt TDP, which allows for sustained high output.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, however, should not be dismissed solely on benchmark losses. Its 28-watt TDP is less than half of the Intel part's 65-watt rating, which indicates significantly lower power consumption and heat generation. It uses a more advanced 4 nm process node from TSMC, supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and includes a Radeon 890M integrated GPU. The AMD part also has a higher average benchmark score (62839 versus 52301) and a higher percentile ranking (93rd versus 91st), although this is due to the differing benchmark sets each processor was tested with. For users prioritizing raw performance in multithreaded and arithmetic workloads, the Intel Core i7-14700 is the clear choice from the data.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 | Intel Core i7-14700 |

|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 20 |

| Threads | 24 | 28 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRN40 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700 wins in every recorded head-to-head benchmark, making it the superior choice for performance-oriented tasks. Its largest advantages appear in floating-point math (33.9% ahead), data encryption (33.7% ahead), and random string sorting (25.4% ahead). These results indicate a strong fit for scientific computing, financial modeling, cryptography, and data processing workloads. The Intel part also leads in integer math by 23.8% and data compression by 24.8%, which supports database operations, file archiving, and general productivity software. The multithread score advantage of 21.1% further confirms its capability in video rendering, software compilation, and other parallelized tasks.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has no recorded benchmark wins, but its profile suggests suitability for different scenarios. Its 28-watt TDP and mobile market segment positioning make it appropriate for embedded systems, compact devices, and power-sensitive applications where the 65-watt Intel part would be impractical. The support for LPDDR5X memory and the Radeon 890M integrated graphics provide additional flexibility for integrated designs. The AMD processor also offers PCIe Gen 4 connectivity and a 4 nm process node, which may appeal to designs prioritizing efficiency over raw throughput. The single-thread gap of only 6.1% and the extended instructions gap of 6.5% indicate that the AMD part remains competitive in lighter workloads, even if it does not surpass the Intel processor in any measured category.