AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core 5 223PQE Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185
Core 5 223PQE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core 5 223PQE
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and Intel Core 5 223PQE occupy different positions in the database, with the AMD part showing a substantial performance advantage across the recorded metrics. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 achieves an average benchmark score of 62,839, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 223PQE, by contrast, has no recorded individual benchmark scores in the database and an average benchmark score of zero, sitting at the 50th percentile. This discrepancy means the head-to-head comparison relies on the AMD part's complete benchmark suite against the Intel part's absence of measured results.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 delivers 31,817 points in the PassMark multithread test, which reflects its 12-core, 24-thread configuration. Its single-thread score reaches 3,977 in both the PassMark single-thread and PassMark singlethread tests, indicating consistent performance across the two naming conventions. The floating-point math test yields 70,587 points, while integer math produces 117,832 points. Data compression scores 374,429, and data encryption reaches 19,612. Extended instructions generate 26,544 points, random string sorting produces 40,557, and find prime numbers completes with a score of 129. Physics testing records 1,772 points.
The Intel Core 5 223PQE has zero entries in the benchmark database, making direct numeric comparisons impossible for individual tests. The AMD part's closest rivals in the database provide context for its standing. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX averages 62,738, which is 0.2 percent behind the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. The Intel Core i7-13790F averages 63,080, putting it 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD part. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX averages 63,173, a 0.5 percent advantage. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 averages 62,498, trailing the P185 by 0.5 percent. These figures show the P185 clustering tightly with four comparable processors, all within a one percent band.
The absence of benchmark data for the Intel Core 5 223PQE leaves its performance profile unmeasured in the database. The AMD part's 93rd percentile ranking indicates it outperforms the vast majority of recorded CPUs, while the Intel part's 50th percentile, based on zero recorded scores, reflects a default position rather than a measured outcome. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark entries and no wins recorded for either processor, which further underscores the lack of direct comparative measurements.
The Verdict
From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the only processor with measured performance metrics. Its average benchmark score of 62,839 places it among high-performing mobile processors, with its nearest rivals all within 0.5 percent of its score. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no benchmark scores in the database, so no performance verdict can be derived from measurements. Its 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder, not a result.
The AMD part's 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with its 93rd percentile ranking, indicate it belongs in the upper tier of the database. The Intel part's 8 cores and 16 threads suggest a smaller parallel workload capacity, but without benchmark numbers, this cannot be quantified. The Intel processor carries a launch MSRP of $319, while the AMD processor has no recorded launch MSRP. The data does not support a performance-based selection between the two, as only one side has results. For workloads where measured performance matters, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the only option with verified scores. The Intel Core 5 223PQE remains uncharacterized in the database.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The processor integrates 12 cores and 24 threads, combining high-performance and efficient core designs. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics solution is the Radeon 890M.
The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The processor integrates 8 cores and 16 threads, all based on a single core design. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics solution is the UHD Graphics 770.
The process node difference is significant: the AMD part uses a 4 nm node, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm node. The AMD processor's smaller node allows for denser transistor packing, though transistor counts are not recorded for either part. The AMD die size is recorded at 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded. The core count difference, 12 versus 8, and thread count difference, 24 versus 16, reflect different design philosophies. The AMD part's larger L3 cache at 16 MB is notably smaller than the Intel part's 24 MB, despite the AMD part having more cores. The Intel part provides twice the L2 cache per core at 2 MB versus 1 MB.
The memory support differs in type: the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and both have a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The PCIe implementations differ, with the AMD part using Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel part using Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
Specification Differences
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and Intel Core 5 223PQE differ across several specification fields. The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock differs substantially: the AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz, while the Intel part runs at 4.00 GHz. The boost clock also differs: the AMD part reaches 5.10 GHz, while the Intel part reaches 5.50 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) shows a wide gap: the AMD part is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 125 watts.
The sockets differ: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The process nodes differ: the AMD part uses 4 nm, while the Intel part uses 10 nm. The foundries differ: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel. The L2 cache per core differs: the AMD part provides 1 MB per core, while the Intel part provides 2 MB per core. The L3 cache configuration differs: the AMD part has 16 MB, while the Intel part has 24 MB shared.
The memory support differs: the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. The PCIe generation differs: the AMD part uses Gen 4, while the Intel part uses Gen 5, both with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 890M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. The market segment differs: the AMD part targets mobile, while the Intel part targets desktop.
The release dates differ by roughly one week: the AMD part was released on February 28, 2026, while the Intel part was released on March 8, 2026. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $319, while the AMD part has none. The Intel part has a part number of SA4QC, while the AMD part's part number is unknown. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Both are listed as active in production.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has an average benchmark score of 62,839. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has an average benchmark score of zero, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.
Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The AMD part is 0.2 percent ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 0.5 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465, 0.4 percent behind the Intel Core i7-13790F, and 0.5 percent behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX.
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads.
Q: What is the thermal design power for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125 watts.
Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?
A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and the Intel Core 5 223PQE support ECC memory. Both also have a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s with dual-channel memory buses.