AMD Ryzen 7 170 vs Intel Core 5 223PQE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the Intel Core 5 223PQE?

A: Both processors feature 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 is a mobile processor, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE is a desktop processor.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds of these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How do their cache hierarchies compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 223PQE features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Intel Core 5 223PQE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What are the thermal design power (TDP) ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a TDP of 35 watts. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125 watts.

Q: What integrated graphics are included with each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 includes a Radeon 680M integrated GPU. The Intel Core 5 223PQE includes UHD Graphics 770.

The Verdict

The data shows two processors with identical core and thread counts but very different design goals. The AMD Ryzen 7 170, built on a 6 nm process, is a mobile part with a 35 watt TDP, a boost clock of 4.75 GHz, and a strong benchmark record. Its average benchmark score is 43689, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 223PQE, built on a 10 nm process, is a desktop part with a 125 watt TDP and a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz. However, the Intel processor has no recorded benchmark scores in the database and an average benchmark score of 0, placing it in the 50th percentile.

The recorded data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen 7 170 for performance validation. The Intel Core 5 223PQE, with its launch MSRP of $319, targets desktop users who prefer higher clock speeds and a larger cache, but its lack of benchmark data means its performance cannot be confirmed. Users who need verified performance should rely on the AMD part. Users who prioritize the higher boost clock and the larger 24 MB L3 cache may consider the Intel part, but the absence of recorded measurements leaves its real-world capability unquantified.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table between the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the Intel Core 5 223PQE is empty in the database. Consequently, there are no direct comparison scores to report. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a complete set of individual benchmark scores across a variety of workloads, including a PassMark single-thread score of 3128, a multithread score of 20760, and an integer math score of 79738. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores whatsoever.

Given the absence of head-to-head figures, the analysis must rely on the available benchmark data for the AMD processor and the specification sheet for the Intel processor. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 shows strong results in floating point math with a score of 44979, extended instructions with a score of 18107, and data encryption with a score of 16078. It also achieves a data compression score of 265920, a random string sorting score of 27804, and a physics score of 890. The find prime numbers score is 49.

Without any benchmark data for the Intel Core 5 223PQE, direct numerical comparisons are impossible. The database indicates zero wins for either processor in the head-to-head section, reflecting the lack of recorded comparison tests. The AMD Ryzen 7 170's nearest rivals in the database are other AMD processors, including the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 with an average score of 43704 and a delta of 0 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 260 with an average score of 43717 and a delta of -0.1 percent, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 with an average score of 43431 and a delta of 0.6 percent. These comparisons show the AMD Ryzen 7 170 performing within a narrow band of its closest competitors.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel part holds the clock speed advantage at both settings.

The TDP difference is substantial. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 is rated at 35 watts, typical for a mobile processor, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE is rated at 125 watts, reflecting its desktop orientation. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support also differs. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 supports only DDR5, whereas the Intel Core 5 223PQE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The memory bandwidth figures differ as well: the AMD part reaches 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel part reaches 89.6 GB/s.

The PCIe capabilities are different. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 5 223PQE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD part has a die size of 210 mm², while the Intel part has no recorded die size. The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 5 223PQE is $319; the AMD Ryzen 7 170 has no recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is clear. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and belongs to the Ryzen 7 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, belongs to the Core 5 generation, and is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD part uses a smaller process node, which typically contributes to its lower 35 watt TDP.

The cache structures differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has a larger L1, L2, and L3 cache at every level.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 uses the Radeon 680M, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE uses UHD Graphics 770. The market segments are also different: the AMD part targets mobile, while the Intel part targets desktop. Both processors have a locked multiplier, meaning neither supports unlocked overclocking through the multiplier. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000000989, while the Intel part has a part number of SA4QC.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 wins on the basis of verified performance. The database contains a full suite of benchmark scores for this processor, and its average benchmark score of 43689 places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result for a mobile processor with a 35 watt TDP. The recorded scores show particular strength in data compression at 265920 and integer math at 79738, which are useful for productivity and general computing workloads. The single-thread score of 3128 and multithread score of 20760 confirm balanced performance across both lightly threaded and heavily threaded applications. The 6 nm process node and the 210 mm² die size are also notable engineering attributes.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE wins on raw specification potential. Its boost clock of 5.50 GHz is 0.75 GHz higher than the AMD part's 4.75 GHz. Its base clock of 4.00 GHz is also 0.80 GHz higher. The larger cache hierarchy, including 24 MB of L3 cache versus 16 MB, could benefit workloads with large working sets. The higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, the support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes are additional specification advantages. The Intel part also has a higher TDP of 125 watts, which allows for sustained high-clock operation in a desktop environment.

The core and thread counts are identical, so neither processor wins on parallelism count. Both have 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD part has a substantial advantage in power efficiency, with a 35 watt TDP versus 125 watts, and it has the only recorded benchmark data. The Intel part offers higher clocks and a wider feature set on paper but lacks any measured results in the database. Users who require validated performance data will find it only for the AMD Ryzen 7 170. Users who value the higher clock speeds and larger cache of the Intel Core 5 223PQE must accept that its performance remains unmeasured.