AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

The Verdict

The database places both processors at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, with no recorded benchmark scores or head-to-head results distinguishing them. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is a 10-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on a 4 nm process, while the Intel Processor 300T is a 2-core, 4-thread desktop chip on a 10 nm process. Based strictly on the available data, the AMD part offers a substantial core and thread advantage, a higher boost clock, and a more advanced process node. The Intel part counters with a higher base clock, a lower launch MSRP (which is not a performance metric), and a different memory support profile.

The data indicates the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i should be selected for workloads that scale with core count and thread count, such as multi-threaded productivity tasks, virtualization, or content creation. Its 10 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, provide a clear structural advantage in parallel processing scenarios. The Intel Processor 300T, with its 2 cores and 4 threads at a 3.40 GHz base clock, is positioned for light desktop workloads where its higher base frequency and lower TDP envelope may be sufficient. Neither processor has recorded benchmark results in the database, so all conclusions must be drawn from architectural specifications rather than measured performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake-S codename and belongs to the Intel Processor generation based on Raptor Lake architecture. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 163 mm².

Core and cache configurations differ sharply. The AMD part provides 10 cores and 20 threads, with an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1 MB per core, and a 16 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel part provides 2 cores and 4 threads, with an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1.25 MB per core, and a 6 MB shared L3 cache. Per-core L2 capacity is higher on the Intel chip, but the AMD chip has a larger aggregate L3 pool and vastly more total core resources.

Memory support also separates the two. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded and ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ in branding and positioning. The AMD chip includes the Radeon 880M, while the Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 710. Both processors have locked multipliers, indicating no overclocking support. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, targets the mobile market segment, and was released in 2026. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700, targets the desktop market segment, and was released in 2024. Both are listed as active production parts.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T has no boost clock recorded in the database; its base clock is 3.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a higher process node advantage?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor 300T is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: What are the market segments for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i targets the mobile segment. The Intel Processor 300T targets the desktop segment.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every recorded specification field.

• Cores: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores; Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores.
• Threads: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 20 threads; Intel Processor 300T has 4 threads.
• Base clock: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i runs at 2.00 GHz; Intel Processor 300T runs at 3.40 GHz.
• Boost clock: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i reaches 5.00 GHz; Intel Processor 300T has no recorded boost clock.
• TDP: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is rated at 28; Intel Processor 300T is rated at 35.
• Socket: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses AMD Socket FP8; Intel Processor 300T uses Intel Socket 1700.
• Codename: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses Gorgon Point; Intel Processor 300T uses Raptor Lake-S.
• Generation: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c); Intel Processor 300T is Intel Processor (Raptor Lake).
• Process node: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is 4 nm; Intel Processor 300T is 10 nm.
• Foundry: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses TSMC; Intel Processor 300T uses Intel.
• Die size: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i measures 233 mm²; Intel Processor 300T measures 163 mm².
• L2 cache per core: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 1 MB per core; Intel Processor 300T has 1.25 MB per core.
• L3 cache: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 16 MB; Intel Processor 300T has 6 MB.
• Memory support: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X; Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory bandwidth: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i records 89.6 GB/s; Intel Processor 300T has no recorded bandwidth.
• ECC memory: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports ECC; Intel Processor 300T does not.
• PCIe generation: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses Gen 4; Intel Processor 300T uses Gen 5.
• Integrated graphics: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i includes Radeon 880M; Intel Processor 300T includes UHD Graphics 710.
• Market segment: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is mobile; Intel Processor 300T is desktop.
• Release date: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i released in 2026; Intel Processor 300T released in 2024.
• Launch MSRP: Intel Processor 300T has a launch MSRP of $82; AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded launch MSRP.
• Part number: Intel Processor 300T is SRN3K; AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded part number.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data is empty, and neither processor has recorded benchmark scores or nearest rivals in the database. Both parts sit at the 50th percentile versus all CPUs. With no measured performance data, the structural specifications must serve as the basis for comparison.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i holds a 5-to-1 core advantage over the Intel Processor 300T, offering 10 cores versus 2 cores. Thread count favors AMD by a 5-to-1 margin as well, with 20 threads versus 4 threads. This core and thread disparity suggests the AMD chip is positioned for heavily parallel workloads where the Intel part would be limited by its dual-core design.

Clock speeds present a mixed picture. The Intel Processor 300T has a 3.40 GHz base clock, which is 70% higher than the AMD part's 2.00 GHz base clock. However, the AMD processor has a 5.00 GHz boost clock, while the Intel part has no boost clock recorded. This indicates the AMD chip can reach much higher single-thread frequencies when boosting, while the Intel chip relies on its base clock for sustained operation.

Cache configuration shows different strategies. The Intel Processor 300T provides 1.25 MB of L2 per core versus 1 MB per core on the AMD chip, giving Intel a 25% per-core L2 advantage. However, the AMD chip has 16 MB of shared L3 cache versus 6 MB on the Intel chip, a 2.67-to-1 advantage in aggregate L3 capacity. The AMD part also has 10 cores worth of L1 cache at 80 KB per core, while the Intel part has only 2 cores at the same per-core L1 size.

Memory bandwidth favors the AMD part, with 89.6 GB/s recorded against no figure for the Intel chip. The AMD processor also supports LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. ECC memory support is present on the AMD part but absent on the Intel chip.

Process technology favors AMD clearly. The 4 nm TSMC node versus the 10 nm Intel node represents a significant generational difference in transistor density and power efficiency. Despite the AMD chip having a larger die (233 mm² versus 163 mm²), it packs 10 cores and 20 threads into that space, whereas the Intel chip uses its smaller die for just 2 cores and 4 threads.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i wins on raw parallel processing capacity. Its 10 cores and 20 threads, paired with a 16 MB L3 cache and 5.00 GHz boost clock, position it for multi-threaded workloads such as compilation, rendering, data processing, and virtualization. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and support for LPDDR5X further support memory-intensive tasks. ECC memory support adds reliability for error-sensitive computing environments. The 4 nm process node indicates a more modern fabrication technology, which typically correlates with improved power efficiency. The mobile market segment designation suggests it is designed for embedded or laptop-class deployments where the 28 TDP envelope applies.

The Intel Processor 300T wins on base clock frequency and per-core L2 cache. Its 3.40 GHz base clock is considerably higher than the AMD chip's 2.00 GHz base clock, which may benefit lightly threaded tasks that run at sustained frequencies without boosting. The 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache exceeds the AMD chip's 1 MB per-core L2, providing a larger private cache for each of its 2 cores. The 35 TDP rating is higher than the AMD part's 28, but the desktop market segment and Intel Socket 1700 platform indicate a traditional desktop deployment path. Support for DDR4 memory provides compatibility with existing memory modules, and the Gen 5 PCIe interface offers newer I/O bandwidth. The launch MSRP of $82 is recorded for the Intel part, though pricing is not a performance consideration.

The data does not provide measured benchmark scores, so the win distribution must be interpreted from specifications alone. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is the structurally superior part for multi-core workloads, while the Intel Processor 300T offers advantages in base clock frequency and per-core cache that may matter for single-threaded desktop applications. The empty head-to-head benchmark array means no recorded test results confirm either processor's performance in real applications. Both processors share the 50th percentile ranking, and neither has an average benchmark score recorded. The database currently contains no performance validation for either part, leaving the specification analysis as the only available basis for differentiation.