AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i9-14900 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i9-14900 is unusual because the available benchmark records cover only the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so direct numerical head-to-head comparisons are not possible. The Intel Core i9-14900, by contrast, has an extensive set of 18 recorded benchmark results across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests.

For the Intel Core i9-14900, the standout multicore results show a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070, a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15910, and a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4793. In single-core tests, the same processor records a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212, a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2245, and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 315. Geekbench results show a multicore score of 18495 and a single-core score of 2488.

Passmark results for the Intel part include a multithread score of 44578, a single-thread score of 4323, integer math at 175010, floating point math at 120262, data compression at 550271, data encryption at 33540, extended instructions at 30624, find prime numbers at 188, physics at 2486, and random string sorting at 61060.

The average benchmark score for the Intel Core i9-14900 sits at 58115, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M with an average score of 58323 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D with 58386 (0.5% higher), the Intel Xeon w5-2545 with 58504 (0.7% higher), and the AMD EPYC 9015 with 57555 (1.0% lower). This clustering shows the Core i9-14900 performing within a tight band of roughly one percent of several high-end server and workstation processors.

Since the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark entries, the database records zero wins for either processor in head-to-head comparisons. The recorded data therefore supports analysis of the Intel part's absolute performance and competitive position, while the AMD part's performance profile remains unquantified in this database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge substantially in their fundamental design parameters. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Core i9-14900 uses a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The AMD chip has a die size of 233 mm², slightly smaller than the Intel part's 257 mm².

Core counts differ significantly. The AMD processor provides 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel processor offers 24 cores and 32 threads. Both processors run at a 2.00 GHz base clock, but the boost clocks differ, with the AMD part reaching 5.00 GHz and the Intel part reaching 5.80 GHz. Thermal design power also separates the two, with the AMD chip rated at 28 watts and the Intel chip at 65 watts.

Cache hierarchies show notable differences. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs, with AMD providing 1 MB per core and Intel providing 2 MB per core. L3 cache totals are 16 MB for the AMD part and 36 MB shared for the Intel part. The AMD processor's codename is Gorgon Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel processor uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core i9 Raptor Lake Refresh generation.

Memory support separates the pair as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, though no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD chip using a Radeon 880M and the Intel chip using UHD Graphics 770.

The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment and uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor targets the desktop segment and uses Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part has a recorded part number of SRN3V and a launch MSRP of $549. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. Both processors are currently active in production, with the AMD part released on February 28, 2026 and the Intel part released on January 7, 2024. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The available data supports only a partial picture of where each processor might excel. The Intel Core i9-14900 demonstrates clear strengths in heavily threaded workloads based on its multicore benchmark results. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070 and the Passmark multithread score of 44578 indicate strong performance for tasks that scale across many cores, consistent with its 24 cores and 32 threads. The 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs reinforces this position.

The Intel processor also shows capable single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4323 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2488. These results place it as a well-rounded desktop processor for both threaded and lightly threaded applications.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i cannot be positioned based on recorded benchmark data. Its architecture suggests certain characteristics, such as a 28-watt TDP that points toward mobile efficiency, and a 4 nm process node from TSMC that implies modern manufacturing. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics and LPDDR5X memory support align with a mobile embedded target. However, without benchmark scores, the database does not validate any specific performance wins for this processor.

The Intel part's nearest rivals provide context for its competitive position. The recorded data shows the Core i9-14900 performing within 0.7% of the Intel Xeon w5-2545, within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D, and within 0.4% of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M. It sits 1.0% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9015. These margins are small, indicating the Core i9-14900 occupies a competitive band among high-end processors rather than a dominant or trailing position.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i provides 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i9-14900 provides 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Both share a 2.00 GHz base clock.

Q: What benchmark scores does the Intel Core i9-14900 record in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 records a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has an average benchmark score of 58115. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M at 58323 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D at 58386 (0.5% higher), the Intel Xeon w5-2545 at 58504 (0.7% higher), and the AMD EPYC 9015 at 57555 (1.0% lower).

Q: What are the process node and TDP specifications for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC with a 28-watt TDP. The Intel Core i9-14900 uses a 10 nm process node from Intel with a 65-watt TDP.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a clear situation: the Intel Core i9-14900 has extensive benchmark coverage and a strong competitive position, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded benchmark results. For users selecting based purely on the database, the Intel Core i9-14900 delivers verified performance across multicore, single-core, and synthetic workload tests. Its 92nd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 58115 place it among high-performing processors, with nearest rivals within a narrow one-percent band.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i cannot be recommended on the basis of measured performance, because no measurements exist in the database. Its architectural profile, including a 28-watt TDP, 4 nm process node, and mobile market segment, suggests a different use case focused on embedded and mobile applications rather than desktop performance. The Intel part targets desktop users with its 65-watt TDP, Socket 1700, and 24-core configuration.

The data shows the Intel Core i9-14900 as the only processor in this comparison with validated benchmark outcomes. The AMD processor's specifications indicate a fundamentally different product category, one aimed at power-constrained embedded environments. Without benchmark data, the AMD part's performance relative to the Intel part remains unquantified in this database, and the Intel part stands as the sole source of measured performance information.