AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i
Core i7-14700F
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i7-14700F
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark database currently contains no recorded scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has a substantial set of measurements across multiple suites. This means a direct numeric comparison is impossible at this time. The i7-14700F's recorded performance profile, however, can be analyzed on its own merits.
The Intel part posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and a single-core score of 4958. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 14751 with a single-core score of 2082. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 3540 multi-core and 499 single-core. These results indicate a strong all-round performer for both threaded workloads and lightly threaded tasks.
Geekbench results for the i7-14700F show 19620 multi-core and 2429 single-core. PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: multithread score of 41317, integer math at 155808, floating point math at 107005, and extended instructions at 28564. Data compression hits 505885, data encryption reaches 30144, random string sorting scores 55918, and physics processing lands at 2455. Single-thread PassMark is 4257, while the find prime numbers test returns 176.
The database places the i7-14700F at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon 6505P with an average score of 53701 (0.2% higher), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53469 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53288 (0.6% lower), and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206 (0.8% lower). This places the i7-14700F in a tight cluster, slightly behind the Xeon 6505P but ahead of three other capable server and desktop parts. The margins are small, all within 1% of each other, indicating that the i7-14700F delivers performance comparable to those established processors.
Since the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison cannot be quantified. The database shows zero wins for either processor in direct comparisons. What can be stated is that the Intel part has a verified performance footprint, while the AMD part's performance remains unmeasured in the database.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The die size is 233 mm². It has 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The thermal design power is 28 W, which is notably low for a processor with this core count and boost capability. It uses the AMD Socket FP8 and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by the Radeon 880M. The market segment is mobile, and the release date recorded is February 28, 2026.
The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Cache includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The thermal design power is 65 W. It uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus. ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. There is no integrated graphics, as indicated by the N/A designation. The market segment is desktop, and the release date recorded is January 7, 2024. The launch MSRP is $359.
The process node difference is significant: 4 nm at TSMC versus 10 nm at Intel. This translates into different transistor density expectations, though transistor counts are not recorded for either part. The AMD chip's smaller process allows for a lower 28 W TDP while still reaching a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The Intel chip uses more power at 65 W but boosts higher to 5.40 GHz and has double the core count. The L3 cache difference is also notable: 16 MB on the AMD versus 33 MB shared on the Intel. The Intel part offers more L2 cache per core at 2 MB versus 1 MB. Memory support differs as well, with the AMD part limited to DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part can use older DDR4 modules or newer DDR5. The AMD part includes a Radeon 880M iGPU, while the Intel part has no integrated graphics at all. PCIe generation also differs, with Intel on Gen 5 and AMD on Gen 4.
The Verdict
The data does not support a direct performance verdict between these two processors because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded benchmark results. The Intel Core i7-14700F, however, is firmly established in the database at the 91st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 53620. It sits within 1% of four rival processors, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which shows that it competes at a high level in mixed workloads.
Looking strictly at specifications, the Intel part offers more cores, more threads, more L3 cache, a higher boost clock, and a higher TDP. The AMD part offers a much lower TDP, a smaller process node, integrated graphics, and support for LPDDR5X memory. These differences point to different intended uses: the Intel chip for desktop systems where power draw is less constrained and multi-threaded performance matters, the AMD chip for mobile or embedded systems where efficiency and integrated graphics are priorities.
Who should pick which, strictly from the data: if the workload requires maximum multi-threaded throughput and the system can handle a 65 W TDP, the Intel Core i7-14700F has verified benchmark scores to back its selection. If the system needs a low-power processor with integrated graphics and the performance targets are unverified, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i presents a specification-based option, but its actual performance is unknown in the database. The Intel part is the only one of the two with measurable results, so it is the safer choice based on available evidence.
Specification Differences
| Field | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i | Intel Core i7-14700F |
|-------|-----------------------------|----------------------|
| Cores | 10 | 20 |
| Threads | 20 | 28 |
| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.40 GHz |
| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |
| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |
| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |
| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Die size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 33 MB (shared) |
| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |
| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |
| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | N/A |
| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |
| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $359 |
Fields not listed above are either identical (such as L1 cache at 80 KB per core, dual-channel memory bus, ECC support, locked multiplier, active production status) or not recorded for either part.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads.
Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i7-14700F support ECC memory.
Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i includes a Radeon 880M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i7-14700F has no integrated graphics.
Q: What is the process node difference between the two?
A: The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process at Intel.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i7-14700F?
A: The launch MSRP is $359. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.
Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700F compare to its nearest rivals in the database?
A: It has an average benchmark score of 53620, placing it 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6505P, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon Phi 7290, 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P. It sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i7-14700F wins in every category where benchmark data exists, simply because it is the only processor of the two with recorded measurements. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and single-core score of 4958 establish it as a strong performer in rendering and general compute tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 41317 and integer math score of 155808 indicate robust throughput for data-heavy and parallel workloads. The Geekbench multi-core result of 19620 and single-core result of 2429 confirm balanced performance across both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications. Its 91st percentile ranking shows that it outperforms most CPUs in the database.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i wins on efficiency specifications. Its 28 W TDP is less than half the Intel part's 65 W TDP. Its 4 nm process node is two generations ahead of Intel's 10 nm node in terms of process size. It includes the Radeon 880M integrated graphics, which the Intel part lacks entirely. It supports LPDDR5X memory, which the Intel part does not. Its memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part's memory bandwidth is not recorded. For systems where power consumption, integrated graphics, and mobile form factor are priorities, the AMD part has the specification advantage. For systems where verified performance and raw multi-threaded capability are required, the Intel part has the data advantage. The database cannot award a benchmark win to the AMD processor because no scores exist, so the only measured wins belong to the Intel Core i7-14700F.