AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i5-14600T Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i
Core i5-14600T
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i5-14600T
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i5-14600T. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors stand at zero. This absence of comparative testing means any analysis must rely on the available benchmark data for the Intel part and the architectural specifications for the AMD part.
What the recorded data does show is a complete benchmark profile for the Intel Core i5-14600T, spanning Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score reaches 22447, while the single-core score sits at 3169. In Cinebench R20, the multicore result is 9427 with a single-core score of 1330. The older Cinebench R15 test yields a multicore score of 2262 and a single-core score of 319.
Geekbench results for the Intel part show a multicore score of 12840 and a single-core score of 2559. Passmark tests reveal varied performance across different workloads. The multithread score is 26409, single-thread score is 3744, integer math reaches 95112, and floating-point math hits 64726. Data compression scores 301827, data encryption scores 18226, and extended instructions score 16985. Random string sorting produces 34310, prime number finding produces 121, and physics scores 1873.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. The Intel Core i5-14600T, by contrast, holds an average benchmark score of 32707 and sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This percentile gap suggests that the Intel part outperforms roughly a third of all recorded CPUs, while the AMD part's percentile reflects the absence of recorded performance data rather than measured capability.
The Verdict
From the data alone, the Intel Core i5-14600T is the only processor with measurable performance evidence. Its 83rd percentile ranking places it ahead of most CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals confirm this position: the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697 with a delta of 0 percent, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 with a delta of -0.1 percent, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 with a delta of 0.1 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 with a delta of -0.3 percent. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the i5-14600T sits in a tightly clustered performance band where no rival holds a meaningful edge.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i cannot be evaluated on the same terms because no benchmark scores exist for it in the database. Its percentile of 50, combined with a zero average score, signals that the database has no recorded measurements for this part. Any verdict comparing the two must therefore state that the Intel part has demonstrated performance data while the AMD part does not, and the Intel part's recorded scores place it among the top performers in the database.
For users selecting between these two, the Intel Core i5-14600T offers verified performance across a wide range of workloads, from Cinebench rendering to Passmark math and encryption tests. The AMD part, based on the available data, offers no measured performance to compare. The Intel part also carries a launch MSRP of $255, which appears once in the database as a reference point. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded.
FAQ
Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?
A: No. The AMD part has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of zero, and a percentile versus all CPUs of 50.
Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14600T's best Cinebench result?
A: The highest Cinebench score for the Intel part is 22447 in the Cinebench R23 multicore test, with a single-core score of 3169 in the same test.
Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600T compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel part scores 32707 on average, with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 (delta -0.3 percent), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F at 32750 (delta -0.1 percent), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H at 32697 (delta 0 percent), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662 (delta 0.1 percent).
Q: What Passmark scores does the Intel Core i5-14600T achieve?
A: The Intel part scores 26409 in multithread, 3744 in single-thread, 95112 in integer math, 64726 in floating-point math, 301827 in data compression, 18226 in data encryption, and 16985 in extended instructions.
Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-14600T?
A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-14600T is $255. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no launch MSRP listed.
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across several fundamental specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.
Thermal design power differs as well. The AMD part is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 35 watts. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part's process node is 4 nm from TSMC, while the Intel part's process node is 10 nm from Intel. Die sizes differ: the AMD part measures 233 mm², and the Intel part measures 257 mm².
Cache configurations diverge in the L2 and L3 levels. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.
Memory support shows a clear split. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no memory bandwidth figure recorded. Both support ECC memory.
PCIe generations differ. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part has Radeon 880M, while the Intel part has UHD Graphics 770.
The market segments differ as well. The AMD part is classified as Mobile, while the Intel part is classified as Desktop. Release dates show the Intel part launched on 2024-01-07, while the AMD part has a release date of 2026-02-28.
Architecture Differences
The architectural divide between these two processors is substantial. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14600T uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series built on Raptor Lake architecture.
The manufacturing process separates the two clearly. AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own foundry. This process difference likely contributes to the AMD part's smaller die size of 233 mm² versus the Intel part's 257 mm², though both are physically compact for their respective categories.
Core design philosophy differs. The AMD part combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, suggesting a hybrid arrangement of full-performance and efficiency-oriented cores. The Intel part uses Raptor Lake-R, which in the Core 14th Gen family typically employs a performance-core and efficiency-core hybrid design, though the database does not specify the core composition for this specific part.
Thread counts match at 20 for both processors, but the core counts differ: 10 for AMD and 14 for Intel. This implies the AMD part uses simultaneous multithreading across all cores, while the Intel part's thread count relative to its core count suggests a similar multithreading approach across all 14 cores.
Cache hierarchy reveals a key architectural choice. The AMD part allocates 1 MB of L2 per core and a 16 MB L3 pool. The Intel part allocates 2 MB of L2 per core and a 24 MB shared L3. The Intel part's larger L2 allocation per core and larger shared L3 suggest a design favoring larger working sets, while the AMD part's smaller cache per core may rely more on the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth to feed data.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i5-14600T wins in every category where benchmark data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22447 and single-core score of 3169 demonstrate strong rendering capability. Geekbench results of 12840 multicore and 2559 single-core confirm general-purpose compute strength. Passmark results show particular strengths in data-intensive tasks: data compression scores 301827, integer math scores 95112, and floating-point math scores 64726.
The Intel part's 83rd percentile ranking places it ahead of most CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals all sit within 0.3 percent of its average score, indicating that the i5-14600T holds its own against a tight field of competitors. The single-thread Passmark score of 3744 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3169 suggest strong per-core performance, which benefits lightly threaded workloads.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded wins because it has no recorded benchmarks. However, its specifications suggest potential advantages in specific areas. The 28 watt TDP is lower than the Intel part's 35 watts, which could indicate higher efficiency per watt, though no efficiency measurements exist in the database. The 4 nm process node from TSMC is smaller than Intel's 10 nm node, which could yield power and thermal advantages, but again, no measured data confirms this.
The AMD part's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth exceeds the Intel part's unlisted bandwidth figure. This could benefit memory-bound workloads such as data streaming or large dataset processing. The LPDDR5X memory support suggests an embedded or mobile focus where power efficiency and compact integration take priority over raw compute throughput.
For users choosing between these two parts based on the data, the Intel Core i5-14600T offers verified, high-percentile performance across rendering, general compute, and data processing workloads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i offers a smaller process node, lower TDP, and higher memory bandwidth, but without recorded benchmark scores, its performance cannot be confirmed. The Intel part also supports PCIe Gen 5, which provides double the bandwidth potential of the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4, though real-world gains depend on peripheral support.