AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no overlapping benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i5-14490F. The AMD part has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, while the Intel part has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results. Consequently, direct numerical comparisons between these two processors cannot be made from the recorded data. The Intel Core i5-14490F carries an average benchmark score of 38149, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i holds a 50th percentile ranking, though this figure is based on no submitted scores.

The Intel Core i5-14490F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and a single-core score of 3247. In Cinebench R20, it records 9660 multi-core and 1363 single-core. The R15 results show 2318 multi-core and 327 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 28662 and a single-thread score of 3873. Integer math reaches 87844, while floating-point math hits 66558. Data compression scores 340026, and data encryption scores 18225.

For context on the Intel part, its closest rivals in the database are the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T with an average score of 38194 and a delta of minus 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i5-13600KF at 38103 with a delta of plus 0.1 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221 with a delta of minus 0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX at 38261 with a delta of minus 0.3 percent. The i5-14490F sits effectively at parity with these four processors, with all deltas within a fraction of a percent. This indicates that the Intel chip performs within a tight band of comparable desktop and mobile parts, neither leading nor trailing its immediate competition by any meaningful margin.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark submissions, the database offers no way to quantify its performance against the Intel part or any other processor. The percentile gap between the two (86 versus 50) reflects only the absence of data for the AMD chip, not a measured performance deficit. Readers should treat any performance comparison between these two specific models as unmeasured in the current record set.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD part has an empty benchmarks array, yielding an average benchmark score of 0. The Intel Core i5-14490F, by contrast, has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark tests.

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14490F's best multi-core result?

A: The highest multi-core score recorded for the Intel part is 23000 in Cinebench R23. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score is 9660, and its Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2318.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14490F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38194, a 0.1 percent difference. The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103, a 0.1 percent difference the other way. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, a 0.2 percent difference, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261, a 0.3 percent difference. All four sit within a fraction of a percent of the i5-14490F's 38149 average.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has 16 threads. Both have 10 cores.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i includes a Radeon 880M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-14490F does not.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is built on Gorgon Point, a codename tied to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation that uses a hybrid Zen 5 and Zen 5c core arrangement. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14490F belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, architecture designated Raptor Lake, on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm². The process node gap is substantial: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which typically translates into different transistor density and power characteristics, though the database provides no measured efficiency figures.

Cache organization differs between the two. The AMD part uses 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 16 MB L3. The Intel part uses 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 24 MB L3. The Intel chip therefore has 25 percent more L2 per core and 8 MB more total L3. The AMD chip runs with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel chip runs with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and the same 5.00 GHz boost. Both processors cap at 5.00 GHz boost, but the Intel part starts from a higher base frequency.

Memory support diverges clearly. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X across a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded in the database. The Intel part's broader compatibility with DDR4 gives it flexibility for older platforms, whereas the AMD part's LPDDR5X support points toward mobile and embedded usage.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The AMD processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU only. The Intel processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU only. The Intel chip's Gen 5 interface doubles the theoretical per-lane bandwidth relative to Gen 4, though the database does not include measured transfer rates for either.

The AMD part's integrated Radeon 880M graphics is a major architectural differentiator. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated GPU at all, meaning any system built around it requires a discrete graphics card for display output. The AMD part's embedded AI positioning and integrated Radeon 880M make it a self-contained solution for compact or mobile platforms.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification category in the database. Core count is identical at 10, but thread count differs: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports 20 threads, the Intel Core i5-14490F supports 16. Base clocks differ, 2.00 GHz for AMD versus 2.50 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks match at 5.00 GHz.

Thermal design power differs sharply. The AMD part is rated at 28 watts, the Intel part at 65 watts. This is a 37-watt gap, positioning the AMD chip for low-power embedded or mobile designs and the Intel chip for conventional desktop cooling.

Sockets are incompatible. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. Die size differs, 233 mm² for AMD versus 215 mm² for Intel. Process nodes differ, 4 nm TSMC for AMD versus 10 nm Intel for the Intel part.

Cache hierarchies differ in L2 and L3. AMD provides 1 MB L2 per core and 16 MB shared L3. Intel provides 1.25 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. L1 is identical at 80 KB per core.

Memory support differs. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with ECC enabled and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 without ECC and with no recorded bandwidth. PCIe generation differs, Gen 4 on AMD versus Gen 5 on Intel, with both at 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics differ absolutely: AMD includes a Radeon 880M, Intel has none. Market segments differ, mobile for AMD versus desktop for Intel. Release dates differ, with the AMD part dated 2026-02-28 and the Intel part dated 2023-12-31. The Intel part has a part number of SRN35; the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation of roles. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is a 28-watt mobile and embedded processor with integrated Radeon 880M graphics, ECC memory support, and 20 threads. Its 4 nm process, LPDDR5X memory support, and low thermal envelope suit compact, power-conscious systems where a discrete GPU is impractical. The absence of any benchmark scores in the database means its absolute performance cannot be validated from recorded results.

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 65-watt desktop processor with no integrated graphics, 16 threads, and a higher 2.50 GHz base clock. Its recorded benchmarks show strong multi-core throughput, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 28662. Its nearest rivals in the database, all within 0.3 percent of its average score of 38149, confirm that it performs at the level of mid-range desktop and high-end mobile parts from the same era. The 86th percentile ranking reflects a processor that sits comfortably above the median of all CPUs in the database.

For a desktop build that already includes a discrete GPU, the Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 support and larger 24 MB L3 cache provide structural advantages, and its benchmark record offers measurable performance expectations. For an embedded or mobile system requiring integrated graphics, low power draw, and ECC memory, the AMD part is the only one of the two that fits the requirement profile. The AMD chip's lack of recorded benchmarks, however, means any performance claim for it must come from outside the database. The Intel chip's performance is documented; the AMD chip's is not. Buyers selecting the AMD part do so on architecture and feature fit, not on measured results. Buyers selecting the Intel part do so with a full record of multi-core and single-core scores in hand.