AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i3-14100F Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i3-14100F

The recorded database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core i3-14100F, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark scores listed. This creates an asymmetric comparison where the Intel part can be evaluated against its nearest rivals, but the AMD processor must be assessed on architectural specifications alone. The Intel Core i3-14100F holds a 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 18,519, placing it in a cluster with several closely matched competitors. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with a recorded average benchmark score of zero, indicating no measured performance data exists for this part. This analysis therefore relies on the Intel benchmarks for performance conclusions and on the specification table for the architectural comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, a direct head-to-head comparison of measured performance is impossible. The data for the Intel Core i3-14100F, however, provides a full picture of its capabilities across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the i3-14100F scores 13,084, while its single-core score reaches 1,847. Cinebench R20 results show 5,495 multicore and 775 single-core, and Cinebench R15 delivers 1,318 multicore and 186 single-core. Geekbench results show 7,598 multicore and 2,105 single-core.

The Passmark suite offers additional granularity. The i3-14100F achieves 154,20 in multithreaded performance and 3,778 in single-threaded tests. Specific workload scores include 45,357 in integer math, 35,370 in floating point math, 17,596 in random string sorting, 11,984 in extended instructions, 8,922 in data encryption, and 176,106 in data compression. The physics test yields 1,077, and the find prime numbers test produces a score of 61.

Comparing the i3-14100F to its nearest rivals in the database, the data shows a tight competitive cluster. The Intel Core i5-13420H has an average score of 18,511, which is essentially identical to the i3-14100F's 18,519, representing a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 18,505, a 0.1 percent difference. The Intel Core i3-13100 scores 18,380, placing it 0.8 percent behind, and the Intel Core 7 360 scores 18,374, also 0.8 percent behind. These deltas indicate that the i3-14100F performs nearly identically to the i5-13420H and the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE, while holding a small but measurable advantage over the i3-13100 and Core 7 360.

The benchmark data does not support any wins for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i, as no scores exist for that processor. The wins count in the database is zero for the AMD part and zero for the Intel part, because no head-to-head benchmarks were recorded. The i3-14100F's strengths emerge from its percentile placement: at the 72nd percentile, it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals all fall within a 0.8 percent band, meaning the i3-14100F is statistically indistinguishable from the i5-13420H and the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE in average performance, while edging out the i3-13100 and Core 7 360 by a small margin.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their architectural designs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on a hybrid Zen 5 and Zen 5c core arrangement. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i3-14100F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 163 mm².

Core counts differ substantially. The AMD part provides 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel part provides 4 cores and 8 threads. This 2.5x core advantage for the AMD processor suggests a significant multithreading capacity gap, though no benchmark data exists to quantify the performance impact. The Intel i3-14100F compensates with higher base and boost clocks: 3.50 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost, compared to the AMD's 2.00 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. The AMD part has a higher maximum clock speed by 0.30 GHz, but the Intel part has a substantially higher base clock by 1.50 GHz.

Cache hierarchies also differ. Both processors share an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache totals 16 MB for the AMD processor, while the Intel processor has 12 MB shared L3. The total L3 figures indicate a 4 MB advantage for the AMD part.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i3-14100F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This gives the Intel processor a newer PCIe generation, though the lane count is identical.

Integrated graphics present another difference. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i includes a Radeon 880M integrated GPU, while the Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment, while the Intel processor targets the desktop segment. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses the Intel Socket 1700.

The AMD part has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 58 watts. This 30 watt difference indicates that the AMD processor is designed for lower power envelopes, consistent with its mobile positioning. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so both are locked for overclocking.

The production status for both is listed as Active. The AMD processor has a release date of February 28, 2026, while the Intel processor has a release date of January 7, 2024. The Intel part carries the part number SRMX2, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown. The AMD processor has no launch MSRP recorded, while the Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $109.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i, its wins must be inferred from architectural advantages. The 10-core, 20-thread configuration gives it a clear theoretical edge in heavily threaded workloads, assuming software can utilize all available threads. The 16 MB L3 cache is 33 percent larger than the Intel's 12 MB, which could benefit workloads that repeatedly access a large working set. The Radeon 880M integrated GPU provides graphics output capability that the Intel Core i3-14100F entirely lacks, making the AMD part suitable for systems that cannot accommodate a discrete graphics card. The 28 watt TDP positions it for power-constrained environments, and the 4 nm process node at TSMC indicates a more advanced manufacturing process than the Intel 10 nm node.

The Intel Core i3-14100F, based on recorded benchmarks, wins in every measured performance category. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,084 and single-core score of 1,847 demonstrate solid performance for a 4-core part. The Geekbench scores of 7,598 multicore and 2,105 single-core confirm this. The Passmark multithread score of 15,420 and single-thread score of 3,778 place it in a competitive position relative to its nearest rivals. The data shows that the i3-14100F essentially matches the Intel Core i5-13420H, which has a different core configuration, and slightly exceeds the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE, the Intel Core i3-13100, and the Intel Core 7 360.

The Intel part also wins on base clock speed. At 3.50 GHz base, it starts from a much higher frequency than the AMD's 2.00 GHz base, which can translate to better responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks that do not boost. The PCIe Gen 5 support provides a newer interconnect standard, which matters for storage devices and expansion cards that use the latest generation. The DDR4 compatibility alongside DDR5 gives the Intel platform broader memory options, allowing systems to use either memory type depending on the motherboard and budget constraints.

The AMD part wins on power efficiency. A 28 watt TDP compared to 58 watts indicates that the AMD processor can operate in thermally constrained environments or with smaller cooling solutions. The mobile socket and market segment further confirm this design intent. The 5.00 GHz boost clock is higher than the Intel's 4.70 GHz, suggesting that when a single core reaches maximum boost, the AMD part can achieve a higher peak frequency. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded advantage for the AMD part, though the Intel part has no recorded bandwidth figure to compare.

The Verdict

The database presents a clear situation: the Intel Core i3-14100F has extensive benchmark evidence, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has none. Any verdict must therefore separate measured performance from theoretical capability. For users who prioritize verified benchmark results, the Intel Core i3-14100F is the only part with data to support a decision. Its 72nd percentile ranking and average score of 18,519 place it above the majority of CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i5-13420H at 18,511 and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE at 18,505, are statistically tied, while the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18,380 and the Intel Core 7 360 at 18,374 trail by 0.8 percent. The i3-14100F delivers a balanced profile across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests, with no obvious weak spot in the recorded data.

For users who need integrated graphics, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is the only option of the two, as the Intel part has no iGPU. The Radeon 880M provides display output and basic graphics acceleration, which suits embedded or mobile systems where discrete GPUs are impractical. The 10-core, 20-thread configuration and 16 MB L3 cache give the AMD part a theoretical multithreading advantage that cannot be confirmed without benchmarks. The 28 watt TDP makes it suitable for low-power designs, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock offers peak single-thread speed that matches or exceeds the Intel part's 4.70 GHz.

The choice depends on whether the user requires verified performance or specific architectural features. The Intel Core i3-14100F is a desktop processor with proven scores, a higher base clock, PCIe Gen 5 support, and DDR4/DDR5 flexibility. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is a mobile processor with twice the core count, a larger L3 cache, integrated graphics, lower power consumption, and a smaller process node. The release dates differ by over two years, with the Intel part launching in January 2024 and the AMD part dated February 2026, suggesting that the AMD processor is a newer design. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $109, while the AMD part has none.

The data cannot declare a performance winner between the two because only one side has measurements. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i's zero benchmark score and 50th percentile ranking reflect the absence of data, not a performance deficiency. The Intel Core i3-14100F's 72nd percentile and 18,519 average score reflect its measured standing among all CPUs. For a system that requires immediate, documented performance, the i3-14100F is the verified choice. For a system that requires integrated graphics, high core counts, or low power operation, the Ryzen AI Embedded P174i offers the relevant specifications, but its actual performance remains unquantified in the database.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i lists an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of zero, and a percentile rank of 50, indicating no measured performance scores exist for this processor.

Q: What is the Intel Core i3-14100F's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F has an average benchmark score of 18,519 and sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i3-14100F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13420H has an average score of 18,511 with a delta of 0 percent, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 18,505 with a 0.1 percent delta, the Intel Core i3-13100 scores 18,380 with a 0.8 percent delta, and the Intel Core 7 360 scores 18,374 with a 0.8 percent delta. The i3-14100F essentially matches the i5-13420H and Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE, while leading the others by 0.8 percent.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i includes a Radeon 880M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core i3-14100F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use a dual-channel memory bus and support ECC memory.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i3-14100F:

• Cores: 10 (AMD) vs 4 (Intel)
• Threads: 20 (AMD) vs 8 (Intel)
• Base Clock: 2.00 GHz (AMD) vs 3.50 GHz (Intel)
• Boost Clock: 5.00 GHz (AMD) vs 4.70 GHz (Intel)
• TDP: 28 watts (AMD) vs 58 watts (Intel)
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8 (AMD) vs Intel Socket 1700 (Intel)
• Codename: Gorgon Point (AMD) vs Raptor Lake-R (Intel)
• Generation: Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) (AMD) vs Core i3 (Raptor Lake Refresh) (Intel)
• Process Node: 4 nm (AMD) vs 10 nm (Intel)
• Foundry: TSMC (AMD) vs Intel (Intel)
• Die Size: 233 mm² (AMD) vs 163 mm² (Intel)
• L2 Cache: 1 MB per core (AMD) vs 1.25 MB per core (Intel)
• L3 Cache: 16 MB (AMD) vs 12 MB shared (Intel)
• Memory Support: DDR5, LPDDR5X (AMD) vs DDR4, DDR5 (Intel)
• Memory Bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s (AMD) vs not recorded (Intel)
• PCIe: Gen 4, 16 lanes (AMD) vs Gen 5, 16 lanes (Intel)
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 880M (AMD) vs N/A (Intel)
• Market Segment: Mobile (AMD) vs Desktop (Intel)
• Release Date: 2026-02-28 (AMD) vs 2024-01-07 (Intel)
• Part Number: unknown (AMD) vs SRMX2 (Intel)