AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i
Core 7 350
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core 7 350
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data for this comparison is one-sided. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark entries in the database, while the Intel Core 7 350 has a complete set of 17 recorded scores. This means the head-to-head analysis relies on the Intel processor's measured performance and the architectural specifications of the AMD part, rather than direct numerical comparisons.
The Intel Core 7 350 delivers a multi-core score of 8030 in Cinebench R23 and a single-core score of 2046 in the same test. Its Cinebench R20 results show 5373 multi-core and 758 single-core, while Cinebench R15 records 1220 multi-core and 292 single-core. These scores position the processor at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17779.
PassMark results for the Intel Core 7 350 show particular strengths in specific workloads. The data compression test returns 143123, while data encryption records 10933. Extended instructions score 12045, and floating point math reaches 42809. Integer math scores 33734, and the multithread test records 15170. The physics test returns 1173, random string sorting scores 17238, and the single-thread test records 4100. Prime number finding scores only 107, which is the lowest recorded result for this processor.
The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Intel Core 7 350's standing. The Intel Core 5 221TE averages 17860, which places it 0.5% above the Core 7 350. The AMD EPYC 9374F averages 17693, placing it 0.5% below. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT averages 17891, 0.6% above, and the Intel Core 5 120U averages 17898, 0.7% above. This cluster of rivals within a 1.2% band indicates that the Core 7 350 sits in a tightly contested performance tier.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, which reflects the absence of recorded measurements rather than a performance verdict. No direct delta values exist between the two processors because no head-to-head benchmark entries are present in the database.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 7 350 demonstrates its strongest results in data compression and encryption workloads. The compression score of 143123 and encryption score of 10933 indicate that these operations benefit from the processor's architecture. Floating point math at 42809 and integer math at 33734 also show solid throughput in numerical tasks. The multithread score of 15170 and the extended instructions score of 12045 reinforce the pattern of strength in compute-heavy operations.
The physics test result of 1173 and the random string sorting score of 17238 show more moderate performance, while the prime number test at 107 is notably lower. Single-thread performance at 4100 is competitive with the processor's peer group, as indicated by its 71st percentile ranking.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i cannot be assigned wins in any category because no benchmark data exists for it. Its specification sheet indicates 10 cores and 20 threads, which suggests multi-threaded capability, but the database records no measured confirmation. The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel access and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, which are architectural advantages that could translate to memory-sensitive workloads, but no scores verify this.
The Intel Core 7 350 uses single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, a specification that places it below the AMD part in theoretical memory throughput. However, without benchmark results for the AMD processor, the practical impact of this difference remains unquantified in the database.
Architecture Differences
The two processors diverge significantly in their core configurations. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses 10 cores and 20 threads, built on the Gorgon Point codename with a generation designation of Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). The Intel Core 7 350 uses 6 cores and 6 threads, based on the Wildcat Lake codename with a Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation label. The AMD part has no thread-doubling feature listed, yet its 20 threads against the Intel part's 6 threads indicates a substantial difference in parallel capacity.
Clock speeds differ as well. The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD part holds a 0.20 GHz advantage at boost, though the Intel part's lower base clock reflects its 15 W TDP against the AMD part's 28 W TDP.
The process nodes come from different foundries. AMD uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while Intel uses a 3 nm process at its own foundry. The AMD die size is 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded. Cache hierarchies are structured differently: the AMD part has 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of L3. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 per core and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, with 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel part's larger per-core L1 and L2 caches contrast with the AMD part's larger total L3.
Memory support shows both processors accept DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but the AMD part uses dual-channel access with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part uses single-channel access with 59.7 GB/s. ECC memory is supported by the AMD processor but not by the Intel processor. PCI Express lanes also differ: the AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel part provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes.
Integrated graphics are present on both. The AMD processor uses a Radeon 880M, while the Intel processor uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD part has more PCIe lanes and dual-channel memory, which suits embedded applications requiring expansion and bandwidth. The Intel part's lower TDP and smaller process node suggest a focus on efficiency, though the AMD part's higher boost clock and thread count indicate a different performance target.
The release dates put the AMD part at February 28, 2026, and the Intel part at April 15, 2026. Both are listed as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part has a part number of SAE3F, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1516.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads.
Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 7 350 boosts to 4.80 GHz.
Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 7 350 uses single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: What is the Intel Core 7 350's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?
A: The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17779 and ranks at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database.
Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 350 does not.
Q: What process nodes and foundries are used?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 350 uses a 3 nm process at Intel.
Specification Differences
| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i | Intel Core 7 350 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cores | 10 | 6 |
| Threads | 20 | 6 |
| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |
| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |
| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1516 |
| Codename | Gorgon Point | Wildcat Lake |
| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |
| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |
| ECC Memory | Yes | No |
| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |
| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2026-04-15 |
| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $469 |
| Part Number | Unknown | SAE3F |
The two processors share the same memory types (DDR5 and LPDDR5X), the same market segment (Mobile), the same production status (Active), and both have locked multipliers. The Intel Core 7 350 has a recorded launch MSRP of $469, while the AMD part has no MSRP recorded. The benchmark data shows the Intel Core 7 350 performing at the 71st percentile with an average score of 17779, surrounded by rivals within a 1.2% margin. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i lacks recorded benchmark scores, leaving its measured performance absent from the database.