AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows that the Intel Core 7 251TE holds an 88th percentile ranking across all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i sits at the 50th percentile. The Intel part carries an average benchmark score of 41650, while the AMD processor has no recorded benchmark results in the database. This means every direct comparison in this section relies on the Intel data set alone, with the AMD chip offering no measurable scores to contrast.

The Intel Core 7 251TE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25518 and a single-core score of 3602. In Cinebench R20, it posts 10717 multi-core and 1512 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 2572 multi-core and 362 single-core. These scores place it close to several established desktop and mobile parts. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H, scores 41621 on average, a delta of only 0.1 percent from the 251TE. The Intel Core i7-14700T sits 0.6 percent higher, and the Intel Core i7-12850HX is 0.3 percent higher. The Intel Core i7-14650HX trails by 0.2 percent. The 251TE essentially trades blows with these parts, landing within a single percentage point of all four.

PassMark results for the Intel chip show a multi-thread score of 30022 and a single-thread score of 3568. Integer math reaches 125739, floating point math hits 85607, and extended instructions score 16974. Data compression scores 334399, while data encryption posts 22176. Prime number finding reaches only 140, a low figure that suggests this workload does not favor the architecture. Random string sorting scores 39643, and physics lands at 1938.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmarks in the database, the head-to-head comparison cannot show any wins for that processor. The Intel part wins every measurable category by default. The gap in percentile ranking, from 50 to 88, indicates a substantial performance chasm. The AMD chip's average benchmark score of zero further confirms the lack of recorded data.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD processor has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed. The Intel Core 7 251TE has 17 recorded benchmark entries.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 251TE compare to its closest rivals?

A: It sits within 0.6 percent of four nearby parts. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is 0.1 percent higher, the Intel Core i7-14650HX is 0.2 percent higher, the Intel Core i7-12850HX is 0.3 percent higher, and the Intel Core i7-14700T is 0.6 percent higher. All deltas are small.

Q: What is the highest multi-core score recorded for the Intel Core 7 251TE?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core test shows 25518, which is the highest multi-core figure in its recorded data. Cinebench R20 multi-core reaches 10717, and Cinebench R15 multi-core reaches 2572.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel part also has a higher core count at 24 versus 10.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core 7 251TE list ECC memory support as true.

Q: What is the Intel Core 7 251TE's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $384. The AMD processor has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 7 251TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 7 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm². The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm gives AMD a density and efficiency advantage on paper.

Cache layouts diverge sharply. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 per core but carries 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3. The Intel L3 cache is more than double the AMD L3, which matters for workloads with large working sets. The Intel part also has a higher core count at 24 versus 10, and a higher thread count at 32 versus 20.

Memory support differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and both list a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. PCIe generation differs: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics also differ, with AMD using Radeon 880M and Intel using UHD Graphics 770.

The AMD part targets the mobile market segment and uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel part targets the desktop market segment and uses Intel Socket 1700. Release dates differ by roughly a year, with the Intel chip releasing in January 2025 and the AMD chip in February 2026. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The core counts differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clocks differ: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.40 GHz. Boost clocks also differ, with AMD at 5.00 GHz and Intel at 5.40 GHz.

Thermal design power differs. The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 45 watts. The AMD processor uses a smaller process node at 4 nm versus Intel's 10 nm. Die sizes are close: 233 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel.

Cache specifications diverge. AMD has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3. Intel has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core.

Memory support differs. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both have dual-channel memory buses and identical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. PCIe generations differ: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ. AMD uses Radeon 880M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Sockets differ: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. Market segments differ: AMD is mobile, Intel is desktop. Release dates differ: Intel released in January 2025, AMD in February 2026. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384, and the AMD part has none listed.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 251TE wins every recorded benchmark category because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark data. For multi-threaded workloads, the Intel chip shows strong results. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 25518 and PassMark multi-thread at 30022 indicate robust parallel performance. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration directly supports this. Integer math at 125739 and floating point math at 85607 further demonstrate computational breadth.

Single-threaded performance on the Intel chip is respectable. Cinebench R23 single-core at 3602 and PassMark single-thread at 3568 show it can handle lightly threaded tasks. The 5.40 GHz boost clock contributes to this result.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i would theoretically win on power efficiency and process technology. It has a 28 watt TDP versus Intel's 45 watts, and it uses a 4 nm process versus Intel's 10 nm. The AMD chip also supports LPDDR5X memory, which the Intel part does not. These advantages remain speculative because no performance data exists to confirm real-world impact.

For embedded and mobile applications, the AMD chip offers a smaller power envelope and modern process node. For desktop workloads where raw multi-core throughput matters, the Intel chip has the recorded scores to back its position. The Intel part also carries a higher percentile ranking at 88 versus 50, which places it well above the median CPU in the database.

The Verdict

The data points clearly in one direction. The Intel Core 7 251TE has a full set of benchmark results, a high percentile ranking, and competitive scores against four nearby rivals. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded benchmarks, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average score of zero. Any builder choosing between these two based on the database would select the Intel part for any task requiring measured performance.

The Intel chip's nearest rivals all sit within 0.6 percent of its average score. This indicates the 251TE performs consistently with well-known Intel parts like the Core Ultra 7 265H and the Core i7-14700T. Its 88th percentile ranking confirms it sits above the vast majority of CPUs in the database.

The AMD chip's advantages exist only on paper. It uses a smaller process node, has a lower TDP, and supports LPDDR5X. These features could matter in a power-constrained embedded scenario, but without benchmark data, no performance claims can be made. The 50th percentile ranking suggests it performs near the median, but that ranking carries no supporting scores.

The Intel Core 7 251TE is the only processor in this comparison with verified performance. Its multi-core results, particularly the Cinebench R23 score of 25518, show strong parallel capability. Its single-core results at 3602 in Cinebench R23 indicate solid single-thread performance. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration with 36 MB of shared L3 cache supports demanding workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i remains an unknown quantity in the database. Without scores, the analysis cannot recommend it for any specific workload. The Intel part, by contrast, has clear evidence of capability across rendering, encryption, compression, and math workloads. For desktop users seeking confirmed performance, the Intel Core 7 251TE is the data-backed choice.