AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core 7 150UL Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core 7 150UL are both 10-core processors, but they target different segments and use different silicon. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is a mobile part built for AMD’s Gorgon Point platform, while the Intel Core 7 150UL is a desktop processor from the Raptor Lake-PS family. The data in the database shows that both parts share a 5.00 GHz boost clock, but their architectural choices, thread counts, memory support, and power envelopes diverge sharply. This analysis relies exclusively on the recorded specifications and benchmark data, with no external assumptions.

The Verdict

The database profiles these two chips with identical percentile scores (50th percentile among all CPUs) and identical average benchmark scores (0), indicating that no recorded benchmark results separate them in the current dataset. Given that, the choice between them rests entirely on platform and feature differences, not measured performance. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is the only option for users requiring ECC memory support, a higher memory bandwidth figure (89.6 GB/s), and a 16-lane PCIe Gen 4 interface from the CPU. The Intel Core 7 150UL, by contrast, offers no ECC, a narrower 8-lane PCIe Gen 4 interface, and a lower 15 W TDP, making it the more power-conservative desktop part. For embedded or mobile designs where memory integrity and bandwidth matter, the AMD part is the clear selection. For a low-power desktop build that prioritizes minimal thermal output, the Intel part fits better. Neither chip has a measured performance advantage in this database, so the verdict is driven by connectivity, memory, and power specs.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses a 4 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². Its codename is Gorgon Point, and it belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The CPU has 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a significant feature for embedded reliability. The integrated graphics are the Radeon 880M. The socket is AMD Socket FP8, and the market segment is listed as Mobile. The production status is Active, with a release date of 2026-02-28.

The Intel Core 7 150UL uses a 10 nm process node from Intel’s own foundry. Its architecture is Raptor Lake, with the codename Raptor Lake-PS and generation Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS). It also has 10 cores, but only 12 threads, which indicates a hybrid core design with fewer simultaneous multithreading threads than the AMD part. The base clock is 1.70 GHz, and the boost clock is also 5.00 GHz. The L1 cache is the same 80 KB per core, but the L2 cache is larger at 1.25 MB per core, and the L3 cache is smaller at 12 MB (shared). Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, over a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is not supported. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the market segment is Desktop. The production status is Active, with a release date of 2024-04-07.

The most striking architectural differences are the thread count (20 vs. 12), the process node (4 nm vs. 10 nm), the L3 cache (16 MB vs. 12 MB), and the memory capabilities. The AMD part supports ECC and a higher memory bandwidth, while the Intel part supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5, which may be useful for legacy platforms. The AMD part has a smaller L2 per core (1 MB vs. 1.25 MB) but a larger L3 pool. The Intel part has a smaller PCIe interface (8 lanes vs. 16 lanes). Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either side.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core 7 150UL. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins counter for each item is zero. This means that, based on the available data, there is no measured performance comparison to report. The average benchmark score for both processors is 0, and the percentile vs. all CPUs is 50 for each, indicating that they sit at the median of the database’s CPU distribution, but with no individual benchmark entries to differentiate them.

Without benchmark numbers, the only quantitative comparisons come from the specification sheet. The AMD part has a higher base clock (2.00 GHz vs. 1.70 GHz), which suggests it may sustain higher throughput in lightly threaded workloads before boosting. Both parts boost to the same 5.00 GHz, so single-thread peak performance could be similar, though the database does not confirm this with measurements. The thread count difference is substantial: 20 threads on the AMD part vs. 12 threads on the Intel part. In multi-threaded workloads that scale with thread count, the AMD part would theoretically have a 66.7% thread advantage, but no benchmark confirms this. The memory bandwidth figure for the AMD part (89.6 GB/s) is recorded, while the Intel part has no such figure, so a direct comparison is impossible.

The L3 cache difference (16 MB vs. 12 MB) favors the AMD part, but the L2 cache per core favors the Intel part (1.25 MB vs. 1 MB). The process node difference (4 nm vs. 10 nm) suggests the AMD part may have better power efficiency per clock, but the TDP figures complicate that: the AMD part has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel part has a 15 W TDP. The Intel part uses less power by specification, which is notable given the older process node. The database does not include any power consumption measurements, so those TDP values are the only recorded power data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 20 threads, while the Intel Core 7 150UL has 12 threads. Both have 10 cores.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 150UL does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: Both processors have a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz, and the Intel part has a base clock of 1.70 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 150UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: Which processor supports more PCIe lanes?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only). The Intel Core 7 150UL supports 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What are the release dates?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i was released on 2026-02-28. The Intel Core 7 150UL was released on 2024-04-07.

Q: Do the processors use the same socket?

A: No. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i wins in several specification categories. It has double the thread count (20 vs. 12), which is a clear advantage for heavily parallel workloads such as virtualization, compilation, or rendering, assuming the software can utilize all threads. It also has a larger L3 cache (16 MB vs. 12 MB), which can improve performance in workloads with large working sets that exceed the L2 cache. The AMD part supports ECC memory, which is critical for data integrity in servers, embedded controllers, or financial applications. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is recorded for the AMD part, while the Intel part has no recorded bandwidth, so the AMD part is the only one with a quantified memory throughput advantage. The AMD part also has a wider PCIe Gen 4 interface (16 lanes vs. 8 lanes), enabling more expansion devices, NVMe drives, or GPUs to be connected directly to the CPU. The base clock is higher (2.00 GHz vs. 1.70 GHz), which may provide better baseline performance in latency-sensitive tasks. The 4 nm process node, manufactured by TSMC, is smaller than Intel’s 10 nm node, which often correlates with better transistor density and efficiency, though the higher TDP of 28 W suggests the AMD part is configured for more performance headroom.

The Intel Core 7 150UL wins in power efficiency, at least as specified by TDP. A 15 W TDP is substantially lower than 28 W, meaning the Intel part is the better choice for fanless or passively cooled desktop systems, or for applications where the thermal budget is tight. The Intel part also supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which is an advantage for users who already have DDR4 modules or are building on an older motherboard platform that uses DDR4. The L2 cache per core is larger (1.25 MB vs. 1 MB), which can benefit single-threaded workloads that repeatedly access a small data set. The Intel part uses the Intel Socket 1700, a widely available desktop socket, while the AMD part uses the mobile FP8 socket, which may limit its use in standard desktop motherboards. The Intel part was released earlier (2024-04-07 vs. 2026-02-28), so it has a longer production history and potentially more mature platform support. The integrated graphics are different: Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the Intel part vs. Radeon 880M on the AMD part, but the database does not provide any graphics benchmark scores, so neither can be declared a winner in that area.

For embedded applications requiring long-term reliability, ECC memory, and high memory bandwidth, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is the data-backed choice. For low-power desktop systems where the 15 W TDP is a hard constraint and DDR4 compatibility is needed, the Intel Core 7 150UL is the only option with those specific features. The database shows no benchmark wins for either part, so the decision matrix is purely specification-driven. The AMD part offers more threads, more L3 cache, ECC, higher memory bandwidth, more PCIe lanes, and a higher base clock. The Intel part offers lower power draw, DDR4 support, a larger L2 per core, and an earlier release date. Both parts are active in production, so availability is not a differentiator. The choice hinges on whether the user prioritizes compute density and memory integrity (AMD) or power frugality and memory flexibility (Intel).