AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no completed benchmark runs for either the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i or the Intel Core 7 150HL. The average benchmark score for both processors is zero, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. Consequently, there are no measured performance deltas, no win counts for either part, and no percentile rankings beyond the baseline 50th percentile assigned to all CPUs with no recorded data. The absence of scores means the data cannot indicate which processor delivers higher multi-threaded throughput, single-core responsiveness, or application-specific performance. Any comparison based on measured results is therefore impossible at this time. The only quantitative comparisons available derive from the architectural and specification fields, which are addressed in later sections.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor expose to the operating system?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i provides 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 150HL provides 14 cores and 20 threads. Both processors therefore present 20 threads to software, but the Intel part has four additional physical cores.

Q: What are the base and boost clock frequencies for each processor?

A: The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Both reach the same maximum boost frequency, while the Intel processor starts from a higher base clock.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 150HL does not list ECC support in the database.

Q: What integrated graphics are included with each processor?

A: The AMD part integrates a Radeon 880M graphics solution. The Intel part integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units.

Q: Which sockets do these processors use, and are they interchangeable?

A: The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The sockets are different, meaning the two processors are not physically compatible with the same motherboard.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) for each part?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core 7 150HL has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel processor carries a higher thermal envelope, while the AMD processor is rated for lower power draw.

The Verdict

The benchmark database contains no measured performance data for either processor, so a verdict based on empirical results is not possible. The only defensible conclusions come from the recorded specification fields. The Intel Core 7 150HL offers more physical cores (14 versus 10), a higher base clock (2.40 GHz versus 2.00 GHz), a larger L3 cache (24 MB shared versus 16 MB), and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i offers a smaller process node (4 nm versus 10 nm), a lower TDP (28 watts versus 45 watts), ECC memory support, a higher memory bandwidth figure (89.6 GB/s, which the Intel part lacks in the database), and more PCIe lanes from the CPU (16 versus 8).

For a workload that scales with core count and cache capacity, the Intel part has the structural advantage on paper. For power-constrained environments or applications requiring ECC memory, the AMD part presents the more favorable specification profile. The data does not permit a performance winner. The choice between the two rests entirely on which specification differences matter more for the intended use case, since no benchmark results are recorded.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded fields:

• Cores: AMD 10, Intel 14.
• Threads: Both 20, no difference.
• Base clock: AMD 2.00 GHz, Intel 2.40 GHz.
• Boost clock: Both 5.00 GHz, no difference.
• TDP: AMD 28 watts, Intel 45 watts.
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8, Intel Socket 1700.
• Process node: AMD 4 nm, Intel 10 nm.
• Foundry: AMD uses TSMC, Intel uses Intel.
• Die size: AMD 233 mm², Intel not recorded.
• L2 cache: AMD 1 MB per core, Intel 2 MB per core.
• L3 cache: AMD 16 MB, Intel 24 MB shared.
• Memory support: AMD DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory bandwidth: AMD 89.6 GB/s, Intel not recorded.
• ECC memory: AMD yes, Intel no.
• PCIe lanes (CPU only): AMD Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel Gen 4 with 8 lanes.
• Integrated graphics: AMD Radeon 880M, Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.
• Market segment: AMD Mobile, Intel Desktop.
• Release date: AMD 2026-02-28, Intel 2024-04-07.
• L1 cache: Both 80 KB per core, no difference.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. The processor integrates a Radeon 880M graphics unit, supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The market segment is Mobile, and the processor uses AMD Socket FP8. The production status is Active.

The Intel Core 7 150HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename and belongs to the Core 7 generation built on the Raptor Lake architecture. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel. The die size is not recorded. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The processor integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and does not support ECC memory. The memory bandwidth figure is not recorded in the database. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The market segment is Desktop, and the processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The production status is Active.

The architectural differences are substantial. The AMD part uses a smaller 4 nm TSMC process versus Intel's 10 nm process, which correlates with its lower 28-watt TDP. The Intel part uses a larger L2 cache per core (2 MB versus 1 MB) and a larger shared L3 cache (24 MB versus 16 MB). The AMD part provides double the CPU-attached PCIe lanes (16 versus 8) and supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. The AMD part also records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while no such figure exists for the Intel part. The Intel part supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5, whereas the AMD part supports LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5. The Intel part targets the Desktop segment with a 45-watt TDP, while the AMD part targets Mobile with a 28-watt TDP. These differences define the two parts' distinct positioning: one is a power-efficient mobile embedded processor with ECC and higher lane count, the other is a higher-core-count desktop processor with larger caches and broader memory type support.