AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core 5 330 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core 5 330. The database shows zero wins for either processor in a direct matchup. However, the Intel Core 5 330 has a full suite of 17 benchmark scores, while the AMD part has no individual test results recorded. This asymmetry means the analysis must rely on the Intel part's measured performance, its percentile ranking, and the architectural specifications of both chips.

For the Intel Core 5 330, the Cinebench R23 results show a multi-core score of 13150 and a single-core score of 1856. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 5523, with a single-core score of 779. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 1325, while single-core is 186. These figures indicate a processor that scales reasonably across the Cinebench suite, with multi-core performance roughly seven times its single-core result in R23.

The PassMark integer math test records 33258, floating point math reaches 43885, and extended instructions score 12808. Data encryption scores 11076, while data compression hits 145287. The multithread score is 15471, and the single-thread score is 4088. Random string sorting produces 17771, and the physics test scores 1201. Find prime numbers is the lowest at 114.

The Intel part's average benchmark score is 18345. Its nearest rivals in the database are tightly clustered. The Intel Core i3-14100 averages 18318, a delta of 0.1 percent. The Intel Core 7 360 averages 18374, a delta of -0.2 percent. The Intel Core i3-13100 averages 18380, a delta of -0.2 percent. The Intel Core 3 305 averages 18302, a delta of 0.2 percent. The Core 5 330 sits near the center of this group, within 0.2 percent of all four rivals. The percentile ranking versus all CPUs is 72, meaning the Core 5 330 outperforms 72 percent of the database's tracked processors.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded benchmark scores, its percentile ranking of 50 is the only comparative data point. That places it at the median of all CPUs, well below the Intel part's 72nd percentile. Without direct test scores, the numerical comparison between the two rests on the Intel's measured results and the AMD's positional ranking.

The Verdict

The data indicates the Intel Core 5 330 is the better-scoring processor in the database. Its average benchmark score of 18345 and 72nd percentile ranking exceed the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i's 50th percentile. The Intel part also has a full set of measured scores, while the AMD part has none. For any workload represented by Cinebench or PassMark tests, the Intel processor shows recorded performance, whereas the AMD processor shows no recorded performance.

The Intel Core 5 330's nearest rivals illustrate its competitive position. It is effectively tied with the Core i3-14100, Core 7 360, Core i3-13100, and Core 3 305, with deltas no larger than 0.2 percent. This suggests the Core 5 330 delivers performance consistent with a mid-range mobile processor, neither a standout nor a laggard among its closest peers.

The AMD part's 50th percentile ranking indicates median performance across the database, but with no benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm whether that ranking translates into competitive results against the Intel part. The verdict from the recorded data is clear: the Intel Core 5 330 holds the measurable performance advantage.

Where Each One Wins

For the Intel Core 5 330, the recorded benchmarks define its strengths. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13150 indicates solid multi-threaded rendering capability. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5523 and R15 multi-core score of 1325 reinforce this pattern. Single-core performance is also present, with R23 single-core at 1856.

PassMark results show the Intel part performs well in data compression (145287) and floating point math (43885). Integer math at 33258 and multithread at 15471 are moderate. Data encryption at 11076 and extended instructions at 12808 are lower but still recorded. The physics score of 1201 and random string sorting of 17771 round out the suite.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded wins in any benchmark. Its wins column is zero. The database provides no test scores for it, so there is no measurable workload where it shows an advantage. Its architectural specifications suggest capability, but the recorded data does not support any specific win.

The Intel part wins in every benchmark category where scores exist, simply because the AMD part has no scores. The percentile gap (72 versus 50) further separates the two. The AMD part's lack of recorded data means it cannot claim a single measured victory.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 330?

A: The Intel Core 5 330 has an average benchmark score of 18345.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 330 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Core 5 330 is within 0.2 percent of four rivals: the Intel Core i3-14100 (delta 0.1 percent), Intel Core 7 360 (delta -0.2 percent), Intel Core i3-13100 (delta -0.2 percent), and Intel Core 3 305 (delta 0.2 percent).

Q: What percentile does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i hold versus all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i holds a 50th percentile ranking versus all CPUs.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists zero benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i.

Q: What is the highest single benchmark score recorded for the Intel Core 5 330?

A: The highest recorded score is 145287 in the PassMark data compression test.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 5 330 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The die size is 233 mm². The processor has 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The TDP is 28 watts.

Cache layout for the AMD part includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. Memory support covers DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a dual-channel memory bus and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Radeon 880M. The socket is AMD Socket FP8. The release date recorded is 2026-02-28.

The Intel Core 5 330 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by Intel. The die size is not recorded. The processor has 6 cores and 6 threads, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The TDP is 15 watts.

Cache layout for the Intel part includes 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a single-channel memory bus and 59.7 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 6 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The socket is Intel BGA 1516. The release date recorded is 2026-04-15, and the launch MSRP is $309.

The core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD part offers 10 cores and 20 threads versus the Intel part's 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part also has a higher base clock (2.00 GHz versus 1.50 GHz) and a higher boost clock (5.00 GHz versus 4.60 GHz). The TDP difference is significant: the AMD part draws 28 watts versus the Intel part's 15 watts.

Memory architecture diverges as well. The AMD part uses dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part uses single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s. ECC support exists only on the AMD part. PCIe lane counts favor the AMD part, with 16 lanes versus 6.

The process nodes differ, with the Intel part on 3 nm and the AMD part on 4 nm. Cache hierarchies are structured differently: the AMD part uses per-core L1 and L2, while the Intel part lists aggregate L1 and L2 figures. The AMD part has a larger L3 cache at 16 MB versus the Intel part's 6 MB. The Intel part's integrated graphics use Xe3 architecture, while the AMD part uses Radeon 880M.

The production status for both is active. The market segment for both is mobile. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part's part number is unknown, while the Intel part's part number is SAE3G. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded, while the Intel part records a launch MSRP of $309.