AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core 5 120 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i contains no benchmark entries, while the Intel Core 5 120 has a full suite of 17 test results. This makes a direct side-by-side comparison impossible from the database. The Intel part's average benchmark score stands at 25362, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, scores 25365, a delta of 0 percent, meaning the Core 5 120 matches that chip essentially exactly. The Intel Core i7-11700KF trails by 0.2 percent with a score of 25423, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U also trails by 0.3 percent at 25432. The Intel Core i5-13400F leads the Core 5 120 by 0.3 percent with a score of 25292.

Within the Intel part's own benchmark results, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18255 and single-core score of 2577 indicate strong sustained throughput. The Passmark multi-thread score of 18597 aligns closely with the Cinebench R23 multi-core figure, suggesting consistent scaling across workloads. The Passmark single-thread score of 3595 confirms the boost clock of 4.50 GHz delivers competitive per-core performance. Data compression results show a score of 219535, while data encryption reaches 11131. Extended instructions score 14264, and floating-point math hits 45383. Integer math completes at 60462, and random string sorting manages 21499. Physics testing produces 1333, and prime number finding scores 77.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i, with no benchmark scores recorded, sits at the 50th percentile in the database, a neutral position that reflects the absence of measured data rather than actual performance. Its 10 cores and 20 threads suggest substantial multi-threaded capability, but without scores, the database cannot quantify it. The Intel part, by contrast, has full coverage across rendering, encryption, math, and sorting workloads, giving analysts a complete picture of its behavior.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 120 boosts to 4.50 GHz. The AMD part's base clock is 2.00 GHz compared to Intel's 2.50 GHz.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 5 120 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part offers 4 more cores and 8 more threads.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 120 has 18 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel's L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core, while AMD's is 1 MB per core.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 120 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the socket and process node differences?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses AMD Socket FP8 and a 4 nm TSMC process. The Intel Core 5 120 uses Intel Socket 1700 and a 10 nm Intel process. The AMD part's die size is 233 mm², while Intel's is 163 mm².

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 5 120?

A: The Intel Core 5 120 has a launch MSRP of $211. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i belongs to the Gorgon Point codename family, with its generation listed as Ryzen AI Embedded based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 5 120 uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and represents the Core 5 generation within the Raptor Lake Refresh lineup. Intel fabricates this part on a 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm².

Cache hierarchies differ notably between the two. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part provides 1 MB of L2 per core, while Intel provides 1.25 MB per core. For L3, AMD has 16 MB total, while Intel has 18 MB shared. The Intel part's larger shared L3 cache may benefit workloads with frequent data reuse across cores, while AMD's per-core L2 configuration gives each core a dedicated allocation.

Memory support diverges clearly. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. AMD also enables ECC memory, a feature absent from the Intel part.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU. The newer PCIe generation on the Intel side allows for higher potential transfer rates to compatible devices.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 880M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part targets the mobile market segment, while Intel's part is classified as desktop. This aligns with their respective sockets: AMD Socket FP8 for mobile platforms and Intel Socket 1700 for desktop boards.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge on nearly every recorded specification field. Core counts differ: AMD has 10 cores and 20 threads, Intel has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks differ, with AMD at 2.00 GHz and Intel at 2.50 GHz. Boost clocks also differ, with AMD reaching 5.00 GHz and Intel reaching 4.50 GHz. Thermal design power shows a substantial gap: AMD is rated at 28 watts, Intel at 65 watts. This makes the AMD part far more power-efficient on paper, though the Intel part's desktop positioning allows for higher sustained power draw.

Sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. Process nodes differ, with AMD on 4 nm and Intel on 10 nm. Die sizes measure 233 mm² for AMD and 163 mm² for Intel. Cache configurations differ in L2 and L3, as described above. Memory support differs, with AMD accepting DDR5 and LPDDR5X while Intel accepts DDR4 and DDR5. ECC memory is supported only on AMD. PCIe generation differs, with AMD at Gen 4 and Intel at Gen 5, though both provide 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ, with AMD using Radeon 880M and Intel using UHD Graphics 730. Market segments differ, with AMD classified as mobile and Intel as desktop. Release dates differ by roughly seven months, with Intel launching on 2025-07-30 and AMD on 2026-02-28. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $211, while AMD has none. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part has a part number of SA35V, while AMD's is unknown.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 120 is the only processor in this comparison with measured benchmark data, so its strengths are concrete. Its 77th percentile ranking and average score of 25362 put it on par with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, which scores 25365 with a delta of 0 percent. It also holds a slight edge over the Intel Core i7-11700KF by 0.2 percent and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U by 0.3 percent, while trailing the Intel Core i5-13400F by 0.3 percent. These margins are narrow, indicating the Core 5 120 sits in a crowded performance band.

The Intel part's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18255 and Passmark multi-thread score of 18597 show strong parallel throughput for a 6-core, 12-thread desktop chip. Its single-thread Passmark score of 3595, paired with a 4.50 GHz boost clock, gives it solid responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks. The data compression score of 219535 is particularly high, suggesting the part handles compression workloads well. The 18 MB shared L3 cache and PCIe Gen 5 support give it advantages in data-heavy desktop scenarios and with modern storage and GPUs.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i wins on paper in several structural areas. Its 10 cores and 20 threads double the thread count of the Intel part, which should translate to superior multi-threaded performance once benchmark data is recorded. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock exceeds Intel's 4.50 GHz, potentially giving it an edge in single-thread burst workloads. The 28 watt TDP makes it dramatically more power-efficient than Intel's 65 watt rating, a decisive factor for mobile and embedded systems. ECC memory support and LPDDR5X compatibility position it for reliability-focused and power-sensitive environments. The 4 nm process node from TSMC, versus Intel's 10 nm node, indicates a more advanced manufacturing process that could improve both efficiency and thermal behavior.

The use-case split is clear from the recorded data. The Intel Core 5 120 suits desktop builds where PCIe Gen 5, DDR4 or DDR5 memory flexibility, and a proven benchmark profile matter. Its launch MSRP of $211 and active production status make it a straightforward choice for mainstream desktop systems. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i targets mobile and embedded platforms where power draw, ECC support, and core count take priority. Its Gorgon Point codename and Ryzen AI Embedded branding point to integrated AI workloads, and the Radeon 880M graphics provide a more capable integrated GPU than Intel's UHD Graphics 730. Without benchmark scores for the AMD part, the database cannot confirm its performance level, but its specifications suggest it will excel in multi-threaded, power-constrained, and embedded applications.