AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core 3 N355 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core 3 N355

The database comparison between these two mobile processors shows a clear split in capabilities. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i, built on a 4 nm TSMC process with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c generation architecture, offers substantially higher core and thread counts, a faster boost clock, and a larger L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 N355, a Twin Lake design on Intel's 10 nm process, counters with a lower TDP and a higher benchmark percentile ranking among all CPUs. The data indicates that the AMD part is designed for heavier multi-threaded workloads, while the Intel part optimizes for power efficiency and single-thread responsiveness. The following analysis breaks down where each processor wins based on the recorded specifications and benchmark scores.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i wins on raw processing capability. It packs 10 cores and 20 threads, which doubles the thread count of the Intel Core 3 N355's 8 cores and 8 threads. This advantage is compounded by a boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 3.90 GHz on the Intel part. For workloads that scale with parallelism, such as compiling code, running virtual machines, or rendering, the AMD processor's additional threads and higher clock ceiling provide a significant structural edge. Its L3 cache is also larger, at 16 MB shared, compared to 6 MB shared on the Intel, which reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The AMD processor also supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, a major advantage for memory-intensive applications.

The Intel Core 3 N355 wins on efficiency and single-thread performance metrics. Its TDP is nearly half, at 15 watts versus 28 watts, making it the more suitable choice for fanless or passively cooled designs. Despite having fewer cores and a lower boost clock, the recorded Cinebench single-core scores are competitive: the Intel part scores 168 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 509 in R20 single-core, and 1039 in R23 single-core. While these numbers are lower than what the AMD's 5.00 GHz boost would typically allow, the Intel part's architecture delivers strong per-core efficiency. The Intel processor also has a higher percentile ranking, sitting at the 68th percentile versus the AMD's 50th percentile, indicating that among all CPUs in the database, the Intel part outperforms a larger share of the field on average.

The Verdict

The data positions the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i as the processor for compute-heavy tasks that use every available thread. Its 10-core, 20-thread configuration, paired with 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, makes it the clear choice for workloads like software compilation, data analysis, or 3D modeling. The Intel Core 3 N355, by contrast, is the pick for systems where power draw is the primary constraint. Its 15-watt TDP allows for thinner, lighter, and quieter devices, and its higher benchmark percentile (68 vs 50) suggests that its average performance across a broad set of tasks is more competitive for its class. For users who prioritize battery life and portability over peak multi-threaded output, the Intel part delivers a better balance. For users who need maximum throughput and do not mind a higher power envelope, the AMD part is the definitive winner.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database provides a complete set of Cinebench and PassMark scores for the Intel Core 3 N355. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded benchmark scores in this comparison, so the head-to-head is based on the Intel part's absolute numbers and the architectural differences between the two.

The Intel Core 3 N355 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5262 and a single-core score of 1039. In Cinebench R20, it scores 3612 multi-core and 509 single-core, while in R15, it scores 822 multi-core and 168 single-core. These results show a multi-core to single-core ratio of roughly 5:1 in R23, which is typical for a processor with 8 cores and no SMT. The AMD part, with 20 threads, would theoretically produce a higher multi-core score, but the database does not include such a measurement.

In PassMark tests, the Intel processor shows specific strengths. It scores 117435 in data compression, 8121 in data encryption, and 5968 in extended instructions. Its floating point math score is 22695, while its integer math score is 33894. The Intel part scores 10174 in the multithread test and 2153 in the single-thread test. It also scores 625 in physics and 14706 in random string sorting. These figures establish a baseline for the Intel part, but without comparable AMD benchmark results, the head-to-head comparison relies on the specification sheet: the AMD's 20 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock suggest it would outperform the Intel part in multi-threaded PassMark tests, while the Intel part's 2153 single-thread score indicates it holds its own in lightly threaded tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 3 N355 has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The AMD processor boosts up to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel processor boosts up to 3.90 GHz.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The AMD part has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 15 watts, indicating the Intel processor consumes significantly less power.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 3 N355 does not.

Q: What are their respective memory bandwidths?

A: The AMD processor supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor uses a single-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s.

Q: How do their benchmark percentiles compare?

A: The Intel Core 3 N355 ranks in the 68th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i ranks in the 50th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which is based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation, which is based on Alder Lake-N architecture. It is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. The AMD part integrates a Radeon 880M graphics unit, while the Intel part integrates UHD Graphics 770.

Cache hierarchies differ markedly. The AMD part provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part provides 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD's per-core L2 and larger L3 favor workloads with large working sets. The Intel's shared L2 design is more efficient for its lower core count. The AMD processor also supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel processor supports PCIe Gen 3 with 9 CPU lanes. This gives the AMD part a bandwidth advantage for connected storage or accelerators.

Specification Differences

The socket types differ: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1264. Memory support differs as well: the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5. The AMD part has a dual-channel memory bus, whereas the Intel part has a single-channel bus. The process node is smaller on the AMD side, at 4 nm versus 10 nm on the Intel side, and the foundries differ, with TSMC producing the AMD chip and Intel producing its own. The release dates show the Intel part launched earlier, on January 6, 2025, while the AMD part is dated February 28, 2026. The Intel part has a known part number, SRPNT, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either. The base clock of the AMD part is 2.00 GHz, while the Intel part's base clock is 1.90 GHz.