AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core 3 N350 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core 3 N350?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i provides 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 3 N350 provides 8 cores and 8 threads. The AMD part supports simultaneous multithreading, doubling its thread count relative to its core count, whereas the Intel part does not.

Q: What are the boost clock differences between these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i boosts up to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 N350 boosts up to 3.90 GHz. The base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD and 0.10 GHz for the Intel, a substantial gap in sustained frequency floors.

Q: Which processor has the higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i delivers 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth over a dual-channel bus, while the Intel Core 3 N350 delivers 38.4 GB/s over a single-channel bus. The AMD part offers more than double the bandwidth.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 3 N350 does not. This makes the AMD part more suitable for reliability-sensitive workloads.

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 N350 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 3 N350 has an average benchmark score of 9903, placing it 2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-3770 (9706) and 2.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-1035G1 (9684). It trails the AMD EPYC 7F52 (10159) by 2.5% and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 (10230) by 3.2%.

Q: What is the production status and release timing for each processor?

A: Both processors are listed as Active in production status. The Intel Core 3 N350 has a release date of 2026-02-28, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has a release date of 2025-01-06. The AMD part launched earlier.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates a clear split in intended workloads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i offers 10 cores, 20 threads, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. These specifications point toward compute-heavy parallel tasks, memory-intensive applications, and workloads that benefit from simultaneous multithreading. The Intel Core 3 N350, by contrast, provides 8 cores, 8 threads, a 3.90 GHz boost clock, and 38.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Its recorded benchmark scores in the database show a processor that handles moderate multi-threaded loads but falls behind in raw throughput comparisons.

For users prioritizing multi-threaded rendering, data compression, encryption, or floating-point math, the AMD part is the stronger selection based on its architectural resources. The Intel part, with its lower TDP of 7 watts versus 28 watts for the AMD, fits scenarios where power draw is the primary constraint. The database shows the Intel Core 3 N350 sits at the 66th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has a benchmark percentile of 50. However, the AMD part has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, so its percentile reflects its specification profile rather than measured results.

The Intel Core 3 N350 has a single-channel memory bus, which limits memory throughput to 38.4 GB/s, and it lacks ECC support. The AMD part uses a dual-channel bus with ECC support. For embedded or industrial applications where data integrity matters, the AMD part holds a definitive advantage. For low-power, compact mobile designs where thermal and power envelopes are tight, the Intel part delivers adequate performance with a much lower TDP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core 3 N350. The wins count is 0 for both processors in the recorded head-to-head data. However, the Intel Core 3 N350 has a full set of individual benchmark scores, which can be examined on its own.

In Cinebench R15, the Intel Core 3 N350 scores 632 in multi-core and 89 in single-core. Its Cinebench R20 results are 2635 multi-core and 371 single-core. The Cinebench R23 scores are 6274 multi-core and 885 single-core. These figures show a single-core to multi-core scaling ratio of roughly 7 to 1, which is consistent with an 8-thread processor that does not use simultaneous multithreading.

PassMark results for the Intel Core 3 N350 show 80444 in data compression, 5693 in data encryption, 3981 in extended instructions, 20 in find prime numbers, 17781 in floating-point math, 27669 in integer math, 7382 in multithread, 446 in physics, 10102 in random string sorting, and 1974 in single-thread. The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 9903, with a percentile of 66 among all CPUs.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals. This means the analysis of the AMD part relies on its specification profile: 20 threads, a 5.00 GHz boost, 16 MB of L3 cache, and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Those specifications suggest substantially higher multi-threaded capacity than the Intel part, but without measured scores, the magnitude cannot be quantified from the database.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 3 N350 uses 8 cores and 8 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz versus 0.10 GHz for the Intel, and the AMD boost clock is 5.00 GHz versus 3.90 GHz for the Intel. TDP differs significantly: 28 watts for the AMD part and 7 watts for the Intel part.

Sockets are different. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1264. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 over a single-channel bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported on the AMD part but not on the Intel part.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 880M, and the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor has a die size of 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is built on Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI Embedded generation using Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 3 N350 is built on Twin Lake, part of the Core 3 generation using Alder Lake-N architecture. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD L3 cache is nearly triple the Intel L3 capacity, which matters for workloads with large working sets.

The AMD part uses a dual-channel memory controller and supports ECC. The Intel part uses a single-channel controller without ECC. Memory types differ: the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5. The Intel part includes older DDR4 support, which may help with legacy system integration, but the AMD part offers higher bandwidth and ECC.

Foundries differ: TSMC produces the AMD die at 4 nm, while Intel produces its own at 10 nm. The smaller process node for the AMD part likely contributes to its higher clock ceiling and lower power per transistor, though the overall TDP is still higher at 28 watts versus 7 watts. The AMD part has a 233 mm² die, while the Intel die size is not recorded. Both processors are active production parts, with the AMD releasing on 2025-01-06 and the Intel on 2026-02-28.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i wins in multi-threaded throughput based on its core and thread configuration. With 20 threads, it can process twice as many concurrent threads as the Intel part. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock gives it a 1.10 GHz advantage over the Intel part's 3.90 GHz, which helps single-threaded responsiveness as well. The 16 MB of L3 cache versus 6 MB gives it a clear edge for cache-sensitive workloads. The dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth versus 38.4 GB/s means memory-bound tasks will complete faster on the AMD part. ECC support makes it the choice for data-critical embedded applications.

The Intel Core 3 N350 wins in power efficiency. Its 7 watt TDP versus 28 watts for the AMD part means it fits in thermally constrained designs and battery-powered mobile devices. The database records its average benchmark score at 9903 with a 66th percentile ranking, showing it outperforms several older desktop and mobile processors, including the Intel Core i7-3770 by 2% and the Intel Core i5-1035G1 by 2.3%. Its support for DDR4 memory allows reuse of existing memory modules, which may simplify system bring-up. The 9 PCIe Gen 3 lanes are fewer than the AMD part's 16 Gen 4 lanes, but for low-power embedded tasks, this is sufficient.

For workloads like Cinebench rendering or PassMark integer math, the Intel part's recorded scores of 6274 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 27669 in PassMark integer math establish a baseline. The AMD part, with double the threads and a higher boost clock, should exceed these figures, though the database does not provide measured scores to confirm the margin. For single-threaded tasks, the Intel part scores 885 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1974 in PassMark single-thread, while the AMD part's 5.00 GHz boost suggests a higher ceiling, but again, no measured data exists in the database.

The choice comes down to workload type and power budget. Multi-threaded, memory-intensive, or ECC-requiring tasks point to the AMD part. Low-power, compact, or legacy-memory scenarios point to the Intel part.