AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9970X Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9970X. The P174i has no recorded benchmark scores, leaving its performance profile entirely unmeasured. This absence of data means any quantitative comparison must rely on the Threadripper 9970X's recorded results and the structural specifications of both processors.

The Threadripper 9970X delivers substantial measured performance across all recorded tests. Its multithread score of 107,399 reflects a 32-core, 64-thread design operating at a 4.00 GHz base clock and 5.40 GHz boost clock. Single-thread performance sits at 4,530, which is respectable for a high-core-count workstation part. Integer math reaches 465,378, while floating-point math scores 309,719. Data compression completes at 1,757,998, and encryption work scores 86,765. Extended instruction throughput records 142,342, prime number finding scores 615, physics simulation hits 6,835, and random string sorting reaches 191,445.

The Threadripper 9970X holds a 99th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 279,778. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the Intel Xeon 6780E averages 280,438, a 0.2% lead over the Threadripper. The AMD EPYC 9565 averages 285,471, 2% higher. The Intel Xeon 696X averages 286,102, 2.2% higher. The AMD EPYC 9555P averages 287,066, 2.5% higher. These deltas place the Threadripper 9970X at the edge of a closely grouped set of enterprise and workstation processors, with the EPYC 9555P holding the top position among its immediate competitors.

For the P174i, the absence of benchmark data means no wins or losses can be recorded in head-to-head comparisons. Its 10 cores and 20 threads suggest a fundamentally different performance class, but the database provides no measured scores to confirm any specific behavior. The P174i's percentile ranking of 50 places it at the midpoint of all CPUs, though this figure exists without an underlying average score. This percentile likely reflects its architectural positioning rather than empirical testing, as the zero average benchmark score confirms no test results have been recorded.

The Threadripper 9970X, by contrast, has a complete benchmark suite. Its multithread score of 107,399 represents a 64-thread workload, which aligns with its 32-core configuration. The gap between its single-thread score of 4,530 and multithread score of 107,399 indicates strong scaling across cores, a characteristic expected from a processor with 128 MB of L3 cache and quad-channel memory. The 204.8 GB/s memory bandwidth supports this scaling, as data-intensive workloads benefit from the higher throughput.

The P174i's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, dual-channel bus, and 16 MB L3 cache suggest a more modest memory subsystem. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock on 10 cores could deliver competitive single-thread performance, but without measured scores, this remains speculative. The database records no benchmark results for the P174i, so its actual performance relative to the Threadripper 9970X cannot be quantified. The Threadripper 9970X's measured results stand as the only empirical evidence available.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9970X?

A: The Threadripper 9970X has an average benchmark score of 279,778, placing it in the 99th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The P174i has an empty benchmark array and an average score of zero, meaning no performance tests have been recorded for this processor.

Q: How does the Threadripper 9970X compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6780E?

A: The Intel Xeon 6780E averages 280,438, which is 0.2% higher than the Threadripper 9970X's 279,778. This makes the two processors nearly identical in average performance.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Threadripper 9970X?

A: The launch MSRP is $2499.

Q: Which processor has more cores, and what is the difference?

A: The Threadripper 9970X has 32 cores and 64 threads. The P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Threadripper has 22 more cores and 44 more threads.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth figures for both processors?

A: The Threadripper 9970X has a quad-channel memory bus with 204.8 GB/s bandwidth. The P174i has a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two processors into different usage categories. The Threadripper 9970X is a measured, high-performance workstation part. Its 99th percentile ranking, 279,778 average score, and complete benchmark suite confirm it delivers strong multithreaded throughput. The nearest rival comparisons show it sits within 2.5% of four other high-end server and workstation CPUs, indicating that buyers in this segment face a tightly contested field. The Threadripper 9970X's 32 cores, 128 MB L3 cache, quad-channel memory, and 204.8 GB/s bandwidth provide the structural foundation for its recorded performance.

The P174i offers no measured data. Its 10 cores, 20 threads, 16 MB L3 cache, and dual-channel memory position it as a lower-throughput part, but the database cannot confirm how it performs in actual workloads. Its 50th percentile ranking without an average score suggests it occupies a middle ground among all CPUs, but this figure lacks empirical support.

For users selecting a processor based on recorded data, the Threadripper 9970X is the only option with verified performance metrics. Its benchmark results show strong single-thread performance at 4,530 and exceptional multithread capability at 107,399. The P174i's embedded mobile segment, 28 W TDP, and integrated Radeon 880M graphics indicate a different design intent, likely prioritizing power efficiency over raw throughput. However, without benchmark scores, the database provides no basis for claiming the P174i excels in any specific workload.

The Threadripper 9970X should be chosen when measured multithread performance is required. The P174i might be selected for embedded applications needing a compact, efficient processor, but the absence of data means no performance validation exists. The verdict from the database is straightforward: one processor has extensive recorded results, the other has none.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification category. Core count is the most significant gap: the Threadripper 9970X has 32 cores and 64 threads, while the P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks differ substantially, with the Threadripper at 4.00 GHz and the P174i at 2.00 GHz. Boost clocks are closer: 5.40 GHz for the Threadripper versus 5.00 GHz for the P174i.

Thermal design power shows a wide divergence. The Threadripper 9970X has a 350 W TDP, while the P174i has a 28 W TDP. This reflects their different market segments: the Threadripper is a desktop workstation part, while the P174i targets mobile and embedded systems. Sockets also differ: the Threadripper uses AMD Socket sTR5, the P174i uses AMD Socket FP8.

Cache hierarchies are notably different. The Threadripper 9970X has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 128 MB L3. The P174i has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3. The Threadripper's L3 cache is eight times larger.

Memory support differs in channel count and bandwidth. The Threadripper uses quad-channel DDR5 with 204.8 GB/s bandwidth. The P174i uses dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities are significantly different. The Threadripper 9970X provides Gen 5 with 80 lanes (CPU only). The P174i provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics exist only on the P174i, which has a Radeon 880M; the Threadripper has no integrated graphics.

Other differences include the multiplier: the Threadripper 9970X has an unlocked multiplier, while the P174i does not. The Threadripper has a part number of 100-000001594, while the P174i's part number is unknown. Release dates differ: the Threadripper launched on 2025-07-29, the P174i on 2026-02-28.

Architecture Differences

The Threadripper 9970X uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Shimada Peak, part of the Ryzen Threadripper generation. The P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Both processors are manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process, and both have AMD as the manufacturer.

Die configuration differs sharply. The Threadripper 9970X uses four dies, each 70.6 mm², totaling approximately 282.4 mm² of silicon area. It contains 33,260 million transistors. The P174i has a single die measuring 233 mm², with no transistor count recorded. This structural difference reflects the Threadripper's chiplet-based approach, which allows higher core counts and larger cache pools.

The Threadripper 9970X's 128 MB L3 cache is distributed across its four dies, while the P174i's 16 MB L3 is contained on a single die. The Threadripper's per-core L1 is 64 KB, smaller than the P174i's 80 KB per core. Both have 1 MB L2 per core.

The Threadripper 9970X supports DDR5 memory in a quad-channel configuration, while the P174i supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration. The P174i's support for LPDDR5X indicates a focus on power-sensitive embedded and mobile designs. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe generations differ: the Threadripper uses Gen 5, the P174i uses Gen 4. Lane counts also differ dramatically, with 80 lanes for the Threadripper versus 16 for the P174i. Integrated graphics are present only on the P174i via the Radeon 880M, while the Threadripper has no integrated GPU.

The Threadripper 9970X has an unlocked multiplier, indicating overclocking capability, while the P174i's multiplier is locked. The Threadripper's production status is Active, matching the P174i's Active status. Both processors come from AMD, and both use the 4 nm TSMC process.

The architecture differences point to divergent design philosophies. The Threadripper 9970X maximizes compute density, memory bandwidth, and I/O throughput for workstation workloads. The P174i prioritizes power efficiency, integrated graphics, and compact packaging for embedded systems. The Zen 5c cores in the P174i likely contribute to its lower TDP, though the database does not specify the core composition ratio. The Threadripper's uniform Zen 5 cores across four dies enable consistent performance scaling, as evidenced by its 107,399 multithread score.