AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i5-14450HX Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174
Core i5-14450HX
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i5-14450HX
FAQ
Q: What are the core and thread counts for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core i5-14450HX?
A: Both processors have 10 physical cores. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX supports 16 threads.
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14450HX boosts to 4.80 GHz.
Q: What are the thermal design power ratings for these two mobile processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core i5-14450HX has a TDP of 55 watts.
Q: How do the process nodes differ between the two chips?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14450HX uses a 10 nm process from Intel.
Q: Which processor offers PCIe Gen 5 support?
A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14450HX, and how does it rank?
A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX has an average benchmark score of 32040 and ranks in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded benchmark scores and ranks in the 50th percentile.
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data contains benchmark results for the Intel Core i5-14450HX only. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no entries in the benchmark database, meaning its measured performance profile is absent. This creates a one-sided comparison.
The Intel Core i5-14450HX shows strength across multiple workload categories. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 20108, which reflects heavy multi-threaded compute capability. For single-core work, the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2838. These figures place the Intel chip in a strong position for productivity tasks such as rendering, compilation, and scientific computing.
PassMark results reinforce this pattern. The Intel Core i5-14450HX scores 78330 in integer math and 58037 in floating-point math. Data compression reaches 278538, while extended instructions score 17207. The multi-thread score is 23680, with a single-thread score of 3643. These numbers indicate the Intel processor handles both parallel and sequential workloads effectively.
The AMD processor, by contrast, has no recorded wins because no benchmark data exists. Its specification sheet shows a higher boost clock (5.00 GHz versus 4.80 GHz), a lower TDP (28 watts versus 55 watts), and a smaller process node (4 nm versus 10 nm). These specifications suggest potential efficiency advantages, but the benchmark database provides no measured results to confirm performance wins.
The Intel Core i5-14450HX also holds a percentile advantage. It sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD chip sits at the 50th percentile. The nearest rivals to the Intel chip include the Intel Core i7-13705H with a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-14400 with -0.2%, the Intel Core i7-12800H with -0.3%, and the Intel Core i9-11900 with -0.6%. This places the Intel Core i5-14450HX at the top of its immediate comparison group.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The die size is 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14450HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-HX Refresh, and is built on a 10 nm process by Intel. Its die size is 257 mm².
Cache structures differ notably. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core. For L3 cache, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 16 MB, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX has 20 MB shared. The Intel processor therefore provides more total cache capacity.
Memory support differs as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus, but the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both chips support ECC memory.
Integrated graphics differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 includes Radeon 880M graphics. The Intel Core i5-14450HX includes UHD Graphics 710. PCIe support also differs: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
Production status for both is active. The AMD release date is 2026-02-28, and the Intel release date is 2024-01-07. The Intel chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD chip does not. The Intel part number is SRMXK.
Specification Differences
The base clock differs, with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 at 2.00 GHz and the Intel Core i5-14450HX at 2.40 GHz. The boost clock favors AMD at 5.00 GHz versus 4.80 GHz for Intel. Thread count favors AMD at 20 threads versus 16 threads for Intel. TDP favors AMD at 28 watts versus 55 watts for Intel.
Process node favors AMD at 4 nm versus 10 nm for Intel. The foundry also differs: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel. Die size favors AMD at 233 mm² versus 257 mm² for Intel. Socket types differ: AMD Socket FP8 for AMD, Intel BGA 1964 for Intel.
L2 cache per core favors Intel at 2 MB versus 1 MB for AMD. L3 cache favors Intel at 20 MB shared versus 16 MB for AMD. Memory support favors AMD in bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s, while Intel supports additional DDR4 memory. PCIe generation favors Intel at Gen 5 versus Gen 4 for AMD.
Integrated graphics differ, with AMD using Radeon 880M and Intel using UHD Graphics 710. The multiplier unlock status favors Intel, which allows overclocking. Release dates differ: AMD releases on 2026-02-28, Intel on 2024-01-07.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core i5-14450HX. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins counters show zero for both processors.
The only measurable data comes from the Intel Core i5-14450HX benchmark suite. Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 2026, and single-core scores 285. Cinebench R20 multi-core scores 8445, and single-core scores 1191. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 20108, and single-core scores 2838.
PassMark tests show data compression at 278538, data encryption at 15574, extended instructions at 17207, and prime number finding at 98. Floating-point math scores 58037, integer math scores 78330, and multi-thread performance scores 23680. Physics scores 1475, random string sorting scores 29565, and single-thread performance scores 3643.
The nearest rivals to the Intel Core i5-14450HX provide context but no direct comparison to the AMD chip. The Intel Core i7-13705H has an average score of 32076, which is 0.1% higher. The Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32115, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, which is 0.6% higher.
These deltas show the Intel Core i5-14450HX sits within a tight performance cluster. Its average score of 32040 trails the nearest rival by less than one percent in each case. This indicates the processor is highly competitive within its immediate class.
For the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, the absence of benchmark data means no wins can be recorded. Its 50th percentile ranking reflects an average position among all CPUs, but without measured scores, no workload-specific conclusions can be drawn.
The Verdict
The data supports the Intel Core i5-14450HX as the measured performer. Its benchmark suite covers 17 tests across rendering, math, encryption, compression, and single-thread workloads. The 82nd percentile ranking places it well above average among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals trail by margins between 0.1% and 0.6%, which confirms the processor operates at the top of its comparison group.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 lacks any recorded benchmark scores. Its specifications indicate design priorities toward efficiency: a 28 watt TDP, a 4 nm process, and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The 20 threads exceed the Intel chip's 16 threads. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded advantage. These factors suggest the AMD processor targets power-conscious mobile systems where sustained performance per watt matters more than peak throughput.
For buyers who require proven performance numbers, the Intel Core i5-14450HX is the only option with database support. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20108 and the PassMark integer math score of 78330 give concrete reference points. The unlocked multiplier on the Intel chip adds flexibility for tuning.
For buyers who prioritize efficiency specifications over measured benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 presents a compelling profile. The lower TDP, smaller process node, and higher boost clock are documented facts. The lack of benchmark data, however, means its real-world performance remains unquantified in this database.
The verdict depends on whether the buyer values recorded test results or specification-based potential. The Intel Core i5-14450HX delivers the former. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers the latter. The database currently supports only one side of this comparison with measurable outcomes.