AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core 5 213PTE. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and the AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores or nearest rival entries. This means the quantitative comparison must rely entirely on the Intel Core 5 213PTE's recorded results and its position relative to other processors.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,751 points and a single-core score of 3,070 points. In Cinebench R20, it records 9,135 points multicore and 1,289 points single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 2,192 points multicore and 309 points single-core.

PassMark results for the Intel part are extensive. The multithread score is 25,590, and the single-thread score is 3,718 (recorded identically under two test names). Integer math reaches 93,109, floating point math reaches 71,722, and extended instructions score 16,146. Data compression scores 261,083, data encryption scores 14,413, and random string sorting scores 30,106. Physics processing records 2,199 points, while finding prime numbers scores 157.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32,924. Its nearest rivals bracket it tightly. The Intel Core i7-12700 averages 32,942, a delta of -0.1% relative to the Core 5 213PTE, meaning the two are effectively tied. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812, putting it 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G score 33,079 and 33,089, respectively, each 0.5% ahead of the Core 5 213PTE.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark entries in the database, its average benchmark score is recorded as 0 and its percentile is 50. The data cannot confirm any performance advantage for the AMD part in measured workloads. The Intel part's recorded scores place it among a cluster of strong mid-range and upper-mid-range processors, all within half a percent of each other.

The most significant interpretation from the available data is that the Intel Core 5 213PTE performs at a level comparable to a range of established CPUs. The 0.1% gap to the Core i7-12700 and the 0.5% gaps to the two Ryzen 7 parts indicate that the Intel chip sits within a very tight performance envelope. No measurable performance data exists for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, so any comparison of benchmark wins is impossible from the recorded information.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². It contains 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clock is 2.00 GHz and boost clock is 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power is 28 W.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel, and no die size is recorded. It contains 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clock is 2.10 GHz and boost clock is 5.20 GHz. The thermal design power is 45 W.

Cache configurations differ notably. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part also has 80 KB of L1 per core but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core, and carries 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor therefore has more total L2 and L3 capacity, while the AMD processor has more cores and threads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses AMD Socket FP8 and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory.

PCI Express capability differs by generation. The AMD part features Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part features Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD processor carries a Radeon 880M, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 730.

The release dates are close, with the AMD part launching on February 28, 2026, and the Intel part on March 8, 2026. Both are marked as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part has a recorded part number of SA4QM and a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded.

The AMD part is classified as a Mobile market segment product, while the Intel part is classified as Desktop. This distinction aligns with the socket choices and the memory support differences. The AMD part's lower TDP of 28 W versus the Intel part's 45 W suggests the AMD processor is designed for more thermally constrained environments.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data supports clear wins for the Intel Core 5 213PTE in measured performance, simply because it has benchmark scores and the AMD part does not. The Intel processor's average benchmark score of 32,924 and 83rd percentile placement demonstrate strong performance across the full PassMark suite and Cinebench versions.

For multi-threaded workloads, the Intel part records a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,751 and a PassMark multithread score of 25,590. Its integer math score of 93,109 and floating point math score of 71,722 indicate solid computational throughput. Data compression at 261,083 and random string sorting at 30,106 round out the productivity picture.

For single-threaded tasks, the Intel part shows a PassMark single-thread score of 3,718 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,070. These numbers place it competitively against its nearest rivals, all of which sit within 0.5% of its average score.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 cannot be assigned any benchmark wins from the recorded data. Its architecture suggests potential strengths: 10 cores and 20 threads versus 8 cores and 16 threads, a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, and a smaller 4 nm process node versus 10 nm. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics likely outperforms the UHD Graphics 730, though no graphics benchmarks are recorded.

The Intel part's advantages in the data are its higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus 5.00 GHz, its larger L3 cache of 24 MB versus 16 MB, and its PCIe Gen 5 support versus Gen 4. The AMD part's advantages are its higher core and thread counts, its higher memory bandwidth, its smaller process node, and its lower TDP.

For use-case analysis, the Intel Core 5 213PTE is positioned as a desktop processor with recorded benchmark results that match or slightly exceed several established Ryzen 7 and Core i7 parts. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is positioned as a mobile embedded processor with no recorded benchmark results, making its performance profile indeterminate from the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core 5 213PTE?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32,924, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0 with a percentile of 50.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 213PTE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-12700, which scores 32,942 and is 0.1% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812 and is 0.3% behind. Both the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G score 33,079 and 33,089 respectively, each 0.5% ahead.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use dual-channel buses, and both support ECC memory.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 5 213PTE?

A: The launch MSRP is $221. No launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174.

The Verdict

The data supports choosing the Intel Core 5 213PTE for any workload where measured performance matters, because the database contains no benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 32,924 and 83rd percentile placement confirm it competes within a tight group of established processors. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-12700, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, all fall within 0.5% of its score.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers architectural advantages on paper: more cores and threads, higher memory bandwidth, a smaller process node, and a lower TDP. The 10-core, 20-thread configuration with 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 nm TSMC fabrication points toward a modern, efficient design. The 28 W TDP relative to the Intel part's 45 W suggests the AMD processor belongs in power-sensitive mobile or embedded systems.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE counters with a higher boost clock, larger L3 cache, PCIe Gen 5 support, and a full set of recorded benchmark scores. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock and 24 MB shared L3 cache provide tangible performance resources. The desktop socket and 45 W TDP indicate a different target environment.

For users prioritizing verified performance data, the Intel Core 5 213PTE is the only option with recorded evidence. For users prioritizing core count, memory bandwidth, power efficiency, and a smaller process node, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 presents a compelling architectural profile, but its actual performance remains unmeasured in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Core 5 213PTE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 8 |

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $221 |

| Part Number | Unknown | SA4QM |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 83 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 0 | 32,924 |

The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core for both processors. Both support ECC memory, both have dual-channel memory buses, neither has an unlocked multiplier, and both are Active in production status.