AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 213PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
232,803
298,804
passmark_data_encryption
11,267
15,916
passmark_extended_instructions
16,724
19,565
passmark_find_prime_numbers
57
114
passmark_floating_point_math
41,114
68,587
passmark_integer_math
60,879
92,089
passmark_multithread
19,091
26,434
passmark_physics
995
1,624
passmark_random_string_sorting
24,936
32,027
passmark_single_thread
3,757
4,060
passmark_singlethread
3,757
4,060
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,264
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
319
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,436
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,332
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
22,468
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,172

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core 5 213PE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a one-sided comparison. The Intel Core 5 213PE wins all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435. The most significant margin appears in the prime number test, where the Intel part scores 114 versus 57 for the AMD chip, a 50% deficit. This workload, which stresses integer throughput and branch handling, highlights a substantial performance gap between the two processors.

The floating point math test also shows a wide separation. The Intel Core 5 213PE delivers a score of 68587, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 manages 41114, a 40.1% difference. Physics simulation results follow a similar pattern, with Intel scoring 1624 against AMD's 995, a 38.7% advantage. These two results indicate that the Intel processor has a strong lead in compute-heavy tasks that rely on sustained arithmetic throughput.

Data encryption favors the Intel part by 29.2%, with scores of 15916 and 11267 respectively. Integer math shows a 33.9% lead for Intel, scoring 92089 versus 60879. The multithreaded PassMark score, a broad indicator of overall parallel performance, lands at 26434 for Intel and 19091 for AMD, a 27.8% gap. This result aligns with the core and thread counts recorded in the database, where the Intel chip offers 8 cores and 16 threads against 6 cores and 12 threads for the AMD part.

The single thread score is the closest contest. Intel leads by 7.5%, scoring 4060 against 3757. This narrower margin suggests that while the AMD architecture is competitive on a per-core basis, it cannot overcome the combination of higher clock speeds and additional cores on the Intel side. Data compression and random string sorting both show identical 22.1% deficits for the AMD processor, with scores of 232803 versus 298804 and 24936 versus 32027 respectively. Extended instructions round out the list, with Intel ahead by 14.5%, scoring 19565 against 16724.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results indicate that the Intel Core 5 213PE is the stronger performer across every measured category. There are no recorded wins for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 in the head-to-head comparison. The Intel processor's advantages are most pronounced in compute-intensive workloads: prime number finding, floating point math, and physics simulation all show deficits of 38.7% or greater for the AMD chip. These workloads benefit from the Intel part's higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz and its larger 24 MB shared L3 cache.

The data encryption and integer math results suggest that the Intel processor is also better suited for general productivity tasks that involve data processing and arithmetic operations. The multithread score reinforces this interpretation, as the Intel chip's 16 threads provide a clear advantage in parallel workloads. The AMD processor's closest result is the single thread test, where it trails by only 7.5%. This indicates that the Zen 5 architecture in the AMD part is efficient on a per-core basis, but the overall package lacks the resources to match Intel in multi-threaded scenarios.

For users focused on single-threaded responsiveness, the gap is modest. For any workload that scales across cores, the database shows a consistent and often large lead for the Intel Core 5 213PE. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 does not win any category in the recorded measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. Its codename is Gorgon Point, and it belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 5 213PE, by contrast, uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's own foundry. The process node difference is significant: the AMD part uses a smaller fabrication process, which typically allows for better power efficiency per transistor, though the recorded data does not include direct power efficiency measurements.

Core configurations differ. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 8 cores and 16 threads. Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD part and 2 MB per core on the Intel part. The L3 cache shows a substantial difference: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has only 4 MB of L3, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has 24 MB of shared L3. This sixfold difference in L3 capacity likely contributes to the Intel processor's lead in data compression and random string sorting, workloads that benefit from larger on-die caches.

Clock speeds favor Intel. The base clock is 2.00 GHz on the AMD part and 2.70 GHz on the Intel part. Boost clocks are 4.50 GHz and 5.20 GHz respectively. The Intel processor also has a higher TDP of 65 watts against 28 watts for the AMD chip, which reflects its desktop-oriented design. The AMD part is classified as a mobile processor, while the Intel part is a desktop processor. Socket compatibility follows: AMD uses Socket FP8, and Intel uses Socket 1700.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel access and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capability favors Intel with Gen 5 and 16 lanes, while the AMD part offers Gen 4 with 14 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD chip uses Radeon 840M, and the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the single thread performance difference?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 4060 in the PassMark single thread test, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 3757. Intel leads by 7.5%.

Q: How much larger is the L3 cache on the Intel processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 4 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and the Intel Core 5 213PE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 213PE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 | Intel Core 5 213PE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $221 |

The average benchmark score places the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 at 37762 and the Intel Core 5 213PE at 35428. The percentile rankings are close, with the AMD part at the 86th percentile and the Intel part at the 85th percentile. The AMD processor's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804, the Intel Core 5 211E at 37829, the Intel Core i5-13600K at 37685, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37904. The Intel Core 5 213PE's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13700T at 35403, the Intel Core i7-12700KF at 35365, the Intel Core i5-13600T at 35305, and the Intel Core i7-12700K at 35287.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 5 PRO 435
5 213PE
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.7 +35.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.2 +15.6%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.7 +35.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.2 +15.6%
Multiplier
20
27 +35.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Gorgon Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 840M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$221
Part Number
100-000001788
SA4QG
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 Details View Core 5 213PE Details