AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14701TE

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
232,803
220,520
passmark_data_encryption
11,267
11,699
passmark_extended_instructions
16,724
14,354
passmark_find_prime_numbers
57
143
passmark_floating_point_math
41,114
50,219
passmark_integer_math
60,879
65,792
passmark_multithread
19,091
20,042
passmark_physics
995
1,860
passmark_random_string_sorting
24,936
22,760
passmark_single_thread
3,757
2,637
passmark_singlethread
3,757
2,637
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
1,716
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
242
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
7,154
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,010
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
17,035
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
2,405

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core i7-14701TE

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and the Intel Core i7-14701TE represent two distinct approaches to processor design, one aimed at mobile efficiency and the other at desktop throughput. The data in the database shows a clear split: the AMD part dominates in single-threaded workloads and several specialized instruction tests, while the Intel part counters with higher raw multi-threaded scores and substantial leads in integer, floating-point, and physics calculations. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 achieves a higher overall percentile ranking at 86, compared to the Intel Core i7-14701TE’s 78, but the Intel chip counters with a higher average benchmark score in the head-to-head comparison, winning 6 of the 11 recorded tests.

The Verdict

The benchmark results indicate that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is the stronger choice for workloads that depend on high single-core performance and modern instruction set efficiency. Its single-thread score of 3757 is 42.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701TE’s 2637, a decisive margin that will translate to snappier response in lightly threaded applications. The AMD chip also leads in extended instructions by 16.5% (16724 versus 14354), signaling better optimization for newer software code paths. For users running data compression tasks, the AMD processor’s 232803 score outperforms Intel’s 220520 by 5.6%. Random string sorting also favors AMD, with a 9.6% advantage (24936 versus 22760). The AMD part’s 86th percentile ranking across all CPUs confirms its position as the higher-performing part in overall database standings.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE, however, takes the lead in sheer computational volume. It wins the multithread test with a score of 20042, a 4.7% margin over AMD’s 19091. The gap becomes far more pronounced in specialized math workloads. The Intel chip’s floating-point score of 50219 is 18.1% higher than AMD’s 41114, and its integer math result of 65792 beats AMD’s 60879 by 7.5%. The physics test shows the largest delta, with Intel scoring 1860 versus AMD’s 995, a 46.5% advantage. Prime number finding also goes decisively to Intel, 143 versus 57, a 60.1% margin. Data encryption slightly favors Intel, 11699 versus 11267, a 3.7% difference. The Intel part’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide a structural advantage in parallel workloads, and its 78th percentile ranking still places it well above the average processor.

The practical verdict from the data is straightforward. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 suits environments where single-thread speed, instruction efficiency, and low power consumption are critical, particularly in mobile platforms. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the pick for desktops running heavily threaded applications, physics simulations, or math-intensive tasks where its multi-core lead matters more than single-thread agility. Neither part is universally faster; the choice depends entirely on the workload mix.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different silicon. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture from the Gorgon Point codename family, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen family and the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Intel fabricates this chip on a 10 nm process at its own foundries. The die size for the Intel part is recorded as 257 mm², while no die size is listed for the AMD chip.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel processor has 8 cores and 16 threads. Both parts share the same L1 cache configuration at 80 KB per core. The L2 cache differs, with AMD providing 1 MB per core and Intel providing 2 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a major divergence: AMD has only 4 MB total, while Intel has 33 MB shared. This larger cache pool gives Intel a notable advantage in workloads that repeatedly access large data sets.

Memory support and platform features also separate the two. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with a measured bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, though no bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, a faster and wider interface for expansion devices.

The integrated graphics solutions are distinct. AMD pairs its processor with the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The market segments reflect their intended use: AMD is classified as a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP8, while Intel is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 45 watts. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Release dates differ, with the Intel part appearing in the database with a 2024-06-30 timestamp and the AMD part with a 2026-01-04 timestamp. The AMD part carries part number 100-000001788, and the Intel part carries Q49GSRNJL.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3757, which is 42.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701TE’s 2637.

Q: Which processor wins in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE. It scores 20042 in the PassMark multithread test, beating the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435’s 19091 by 4.7%.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has only 4 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has the better floating-point performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE. Its floating-point math score is 50219, which is 18.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435’s 41114.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The database lists ECC memory support as true for both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and the Intel Core i7-14701TE.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is built on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show several key differences between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clock speeds are close: 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.10 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks differ more substantially, with AMD reaching 4.50 GHz and Intel reaching 5.20 GHz. TDP ratings are 28 watts for AMD and 45 watts for Intel.

Cache configurations diverge in L2 and L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel part has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is 4 MB for AMD and 33 MB shared for Intel. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with no bandwidth figure recorded. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

The integrated graphics differ: AMD uses the Radeon 840M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8 and is classified as mobile. The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as desktop. The process node is 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel, with foundries being TSMC and Intel respectively. The Intel die size is listed as 257 mm². The AMD part’s architecture is Zen 5 with the Gorgon Point codename, while the Intel part’s architecture is Raptor Lake with the Raptor Lake-R codename. The AMD part is part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, and the Intel part is part of Core 14th Gen.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data records 11 benchmark tests, with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 winning 5 and the Intel Core i7-14701TE winning 6. The largest single win for AMD comes in the single-thread tests, where both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread report identical scores. The AMD chip scores 3757 against Intel’s 2637, a 42.5% advantage. This is the most decisive margin in either direction across the entire comparison and speaks to the efficiency of the Zen 5 core design at lower power.

The extended instructions test also goes firmly to AMD. The AMD processor scores 16724, beating the Intel chip’s 14354 by 16.5%. This indicates better support for modern instruction sets, which can accelerate encryption, multimedia, and scientific code. Data compression is another AMD win, with a score of 232803 versus 220520, a 5.6% margin. Random string sorting completes AMD’s wins, with a score of 24936 against Intel’s 22760, a 9.6% advantage.

Intel’s wins are concentrated in math and physics workloads. The physics test shows the starkest contrast: Intel scores 1860, while AMD scores only 995, a 46.5% lead for Intel. This is a massive gap that suggests Intel’s architecture handles the physics simulation workload far more effectively. The find prime numbers test shows an even larger percentage gap in Intel’s favor, 60.1%, with Intel scoring 143 and AMD scoring 57, though the absolute numbers are small.

Floating-point math favors Intel decisively. The Intel chip scores 50219, which is 18.1% higher than AMD’s 41114. Integer math also goes to Intel, with a score of 65792 versus 60879, a 7.5% margin. The multithread test, which is often a proxy for overall parallel performance, goes to Intel by a smaller margin of 4.7%, with scores of 20042 and 19091. Data encryption is the closest contest, with Intel winning 11699 to 11267, a 3.7% difference.

The average benchmark scores in the nearest rivals data provide context for these two parts. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has an average benchmark score of 37762, which is 0.1% below the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, 0.2% below the Intel Core 5 211E, 0.2% above the Intel Core i5-13600K, and 0.4% below the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has an average benchmark score of 26013, which is 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 0.4% below the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, 0.5% above the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE, and 0.7% below the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U. These comparisons place the AMD part in a higher performance tier overall, despite losing the head-to-head multithread test, because its average score is driven by the dominant single-thread and instruction test results.

The data shows that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is the more balanced processor for general-purpose computing, with a higher percentile ranking and a commanding single-thread lead. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is a specialist for parallel math and physics workloads, where its additional cores, larger cache, and higher boost clock pay off. The recorded results confirm that the choice between these two parts should be driven by the specific application profile rather than any single aggregate score.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 5 PRO 435
i7-14701TE
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.1 +5.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.2 +15.6%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.1 +5.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.2 +15.6%
Multiplier
20
21 +5.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
45 +60.7%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
115 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
—
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
—
P-Core Turbo
—
5.2 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 840M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001788
Q49GSRNJL
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 Details View Core i7-14701TE Details