AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 records an average benchmark score of 37762, while the Intel Core i7-14701E averages 33206. The AMD part sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the Intel part's 83rd percentile.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-thread performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E leads in the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 4305, which is 12.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435's 3757. This advantage appears in both the single_thread and singlethread database entries.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel processor also has a higher base clock of 2.60 GHz compared to 2.00 GHz, and a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus 4.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports more memory types?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both processors use dual-channel memory buses and support ECC memory.

Q: What are the process node differences between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i7-14701E uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The Intel die size is listed at 257 mm², while the AMD die size is not recorded in the database.

Q: How many benchmark wins does each processor have in the head-to-head comparison?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E wins all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 records zero wins in the direct matchup data.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i7-14701E uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core i7 generation based on the Raptor Lake Refresh. These architectures reflect different design priorities: AMD's Zen 5 focuses on efficiency in a 4 nm process, while Intel's Raptor Lake uses a 10 nm process with a larger die.

The AMD processor has 6 cores with 12 threads, while the Intel processor has 8 cores with 16 threads. Cache layouts differ substantially. Both share an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, but the AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and only 4 MB of L3, whereas the Intel part has 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3. This large L3 difference matters for workloads that repeatedly access large datasets.

The integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor is a mobile part on the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700. Memory support also diverges: AMD offers DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel offers DDR4 and DDR5 with no bandwidth figure recorded. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ significantly. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives the Intel part a newer and wider PCIe interface for expansion. The AMD part has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel part has a 65 W TDP, reflecting the mobile versus desktop positioning.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701E wins every direct benchmark comparison in the database. Its advantage spans all tested categories, from single-thread and multithread workloads to physics, encryption, and math operations. The largest deltas occur in prime number finding, where Intel leads by 67.6%, and physics, where Intel leads by 58.5%. These results indicate a processor that excels in both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy tasks.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 does not win any head-to-head tests, but its average benchmark score is higher than Intel's because the database includes different test suites for each processor. AMD's average score of 37762 places it near rivals like the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37804, delta -0.1%) and the Intel Core 5 211E (37829, delta -0.2%). Intel's average score of 33206 places it near the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33201, delta 0%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (33244, delta -0.1%).

For single-thread responsiveness, the Intel processor leads with a 12.7% margin. For multithread throughput, Intel leads by 26.9%. Data compression shows Intel ahead by 17.7%, and data encryption shows Intel ahead by 24.2%. Extended instructions favor Intel by 9.7%, floating-point math by 33.6%, integer math by 25.1%, and random string sorting by 14.5%. The Intel processor also leads in prime number finding by 67.6% and physics by 58.5%.

The AMD processor's strengths appear in its efficiency profile rather than raw performance. It has a lower TDP of 28 W versus 65 W, a smaller process node of 4 nm versus 10 nm, and LPDDR5X memory support, which suits mobile applications. Its average benchmark score of 37762 is higher than Intel's 33206, indicating that in the broader benchmark set, the AMD part holds its own despite losing the direct comparison.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 | Intel Core i7-14701E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | 100-000001788 | Q49FSRNJK |

The two processors differ in every major specification category except L1 cache size, dual-channel memory bus, ECC support, and unlocked multiplier status (both are locked).

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, and the Intel Core i7-14701E wins every one. The largest margin is in prime number finding, where Intel scores 176 against AMD's 57, a 67.6% advantage. This test measures raw integer iteration efficiency, and the Intel processor's higher clock speeds and additional cores contribute to the result.

Physics simulation shows the second-largest gap. Intel scores 2399 versus AMD's 995, a 58.5% lead. This workload scales with both core count and clock speed, and the Intel part's 8 cores at up to 5.40 GHz outperform AMD's 6 cores at up to 4.50 GHz. Floating-point math shows Intel ahead by 33.6%, with scores of 61873 versus 41114. This indicates stronger FPU throughput on the Intel architecture.

Multithread performance shows Intel leading by 26.9%, scoring 26112 versus 19091. This test captures overall parallel throughput, and the Intel part's extra two cores and four threads provide a clear advantage. Integer math follows a similar pattern, with Intel at 81325 versus AMD's 60879, a 25.1% lead. Data encryption shows Intel ahead by 24.2%, scoring 14862 versus 11267, which reflects both the clock advantage and the larger L3 cache.

Data compression shows Intel at 282939 versus AMD's 232803, a 17.7% lead. Random string sorting shows a 14.5% margin, with Intel at 29158 versus AMD's 24936. Single-thread performance shows Intel at 4305 versus AMD's 3757, a 12.7% lead. Extended instructions show the smallest gap at 9.7%, with Intel scoring 18528 versus AMD's 16724.

The AMD processor's closest result is in extended instructions, where the 9.7% deficit suggests its Zen 5 architecture handles SIMD and specialized instruction workloads relatively well. However, the Intel processor maintains a consistent lead across all categories, with no single test where AMD comes out ahead.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear performance hierarchy in the direct comparison. The Intel Core i7-14701E wins all 11 head-to-head benchmarks, with margins ranging from 9.7% in extended instructions to 67.6% in prime number finding. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, higher clock speeds, and 33 MB of L3 cache give it a decisive advantage in multithread, physics, math, and encryption workloads. The single-thread lead of 12.7% also makes it the stronger choice for lightly threaded applications.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 does not win any direct comparison, but its profile suits a different purpose. It is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, a 4 nm process, and LPDDR5X memory support, which positions it for battery-conscious laptops and compact systems. Its average benchmark score of 37762 exceeds Intel's 33206, and its 86th percentile ranking versus Intel's 83rd suggests that in the broader database, the AMD part performs competitively against other processors in its class.

The choice depends on the use case. For a desktop system where power consumption is less critical and raw performance is the priority, the Intel Core i7-14701E delivers superior results in every measured category. Its Gen 5 PCIe support with 16 lanes also provides better expansion capability. For a mobile system where efficiency matters, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 offers a lower TDP, a smaller process node, and memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, making it a practical option for portable workloads despite losing the head-to-head benchmarks. The data does not indicate a single universal winner; it shows two processors designed for different market segments with different performance and efficiency trade-offs.