AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete set of PassMark measurements for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores in our dataset. This asymmetry means the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the AMD side's recorded performance profile, cross-referenced against its nearest rivals to establish context.

Starting with single-thread performance, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 records a PassMark single-thread score of 3757. This places it in a competitive position within the broader CPU landscape. The processor's floating-point math score reaches 41114, while integer math finishes at 60879. These two metrics indicate strong arithmetic throughput for a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor.

The multithreaded PassMark score for the AMD chip is 19091. This figure, combined with the single-thread score of 3757, produces an average benchmark score of 37762 across all recorded tests. The percentile ranking against all CPUs in the database stands at 86, meaning the processor outperforms 86 percent of all recorded CPUs.

Looking at the nearest rivals in the database, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 sits within a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 records an average score of 37804, a delta of -0.1 percent relative to our subject. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, a delta of -0.2 percent. The Intel Core i5-13600K scores 37685, a delta of +0.2 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, a delta of -0.4 percent. These deltas are all within half a percentage point, indicating that the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 performs essentially on par with these four processors in aggregate workload results.

Specific PassMark subtests reveal where the AMD chip concentrates its strengths. Data compression scores 232803, which is the highest individual subtest score recorded for this processor. Random string sorting finishes at 24936. Extended instructions (SIMD workloads) complete at 16724. Data encryption records 11267. Prime number generation finishes at 57, and physics simulation scores 995.

Because the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries in the database, there are no direct head-to-head wins to tabulate for either processor. The wins tally remains zero for both. The comparison instead proceeds through architectural and specification differences, which are fully documented for both parts.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series within the Raptor Lake Refresh generation.

Process technology separates the two clearly. The AMD chip is fabricated on a 4 nm node by TSMC. The Intel chip uses a 10 nm node fabricated by Intel's own foundry. This process gap typically correlates with differences in power efficiency and transistor density, though the database does not record transistor counts for either part.

Core and thread counts match exactly. Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are identical at 2.00 GHz, and boost clocks are identical at 4.50 GHz. The similarity ends there.

Cache hierarchies diverge substantially. The AMD processor allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 4 MB of L3 cache total. The Intel processor also uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core but increases L2 to 1.25 MB per core, and its L3 cache is 20 MB shared. The Intel part therefore carries five times the L3 cache of the AMD part, which can affect workloads that repeatedly access large working sets.

Memory support differs. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, but the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes. The Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part's PCIe generation advantage offers greater interface bandwidth for expansion devices, though the AMD part's lane count is lower.

Integrated graphics are distinct. The AMD chip uses Radeon 840M graphics. The Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730. The database records no comparative graphics benchmarks for either, so no performance judgment is possible from the data.

Socket and market positioning differ completely. The AMD processor mounts in AMD Socket FP8 and targets the mobile market segment. The Intel processor mounts in Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop segment. The AMD part's die size is not recorded; the Intel part's die size is 215 mm².

Thermal design power differs by 17 watts. The AMD chip is rated at 28 W TDP. The Intel chip is rated at 45 W TDP. The AMD part's lower TDP aligns with its mobile orientation, while the Intel part's higher TDP aligns with desktop operation.

Production status for both is Active. The AMD part carries part number 100-000001788 and was released in January 2026. The Intel part carries part number Q4T4SRNJP and was released in June 2024. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only a partial verdict because one side lacks benchmark measurements. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a complete PassMark profile with an average score of 37762 and an 86th percentile ranking across all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded scores, an average benchmark score of zero, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects the absence of data rather than measured performance.

For users considering the AMD part, the data shows a processor that lands within 0.4 percent of four closely matched rivals: the Ryzen AI Embedded P132, Intel Core 5 211E, Intel Core i5-13600K, and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. This clustering indicates the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 delivers aggregate performance comparable to those established parts. Its 28 W TDP and mobile FP8 socket make it suitable for power-constrained mobile systems.

For users considering the Intel part, the database records no measured performance. The specification sheet shows a 45 W desktop processor with 20 MB of L3 cache, Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, DDR4 and DDR5 support, and a 215 mm² die. These specifications indicate a desktop-oriented part with substantial cache and modern connectivity, but no benchmark confirmation exists in the database.

The only defensible conclusion is that the AMD processor has verified benchmark presence with strong aggregate scores, while the Intel processor remains unmeasured. Any performance comparison between the two cannot be drawn from the database's recorded results.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 | Intel Core i5-14401TE |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 215 mm² |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | 100-000001788 | Q4T4SRNJP |

Identical fields include cores (6), threads (12), base clock (2.00 GHz), boost clock (4.50 GHz), L1 cache (80 KB per core), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC support (yes), multiplier lock (locked), and production status (Active).

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435?

A: The recorded average benchmark score is 37762, with a percentile ranking of 86 against all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the Intel Core i5-14401TE, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD chip scores within 0.4 percent of four rivals: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37804, -0.1 percent), Intel Core 5 211E (37829, -0.2 percent), Intel Core i5-13600K (37685, +0.2 percent), and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904, -0.4 percent).

Q: What are the clock speeds of both processors?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and the Intel Core i5-14401TE have a 2.00 GHz base clock and a 4.50 GHz boost clock.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 4 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses and support ECC memory.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 wins in the recorded performance domain. It has a full benchmark profile, an 86th percentile overall ranking, and an average score of 37762. Its multithreaded score of 19091 and single-thread score of 3757 provide concrete reference points for workload estimation. The processor's 28 W TDP and mobile FP8 socket position it for thin-and-light systems where thermal headroom is limited. Its LPDDR5X memory support and 89.6 GB/s recorded memory bandwidth suit integrated graphics workloads that depend on shared memory access. The Radeon 840M integrated graphics offer a baseline display solution, though no graphics benchmarks exist in the database.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE wins in the specification breadth domain. It offers 20 MB of shared L3 cache versus 4 MB on the AMD part, a fivefold advantage that can benefit cache-sensitive workloads. Its Gen 5 PCIe with 16 CPU lanes doubles the interface generation of the AMD part's Gen 4 implementation and adds two lanes. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving platform flexibility that the AMD part lacks. Its 45 W TDP and desktop Socket 1700 target conventional desktop builds with robust cooling. The 215 mm² die size is recorded, providing a physical scale reference. The UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics provide display output capability.

The remaining categories show no measurable advantage for either side. Clock speeds are identical, core and thread counts are identical, and both support ECC memory. The Intel part's 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache slightly exceeds the AMD part's 1 MB per-core L2 cache. The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark wins for either processor, so the final split is the AMD part taking the measured performance category and the Intel part taking the specification and connectivity categories.