AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 vs Intel Core i5-14450HX Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 and Intel Core i5-14450HX are both mobile processors, but the data shows they are aimed at very different performance tiers. The Intel part wins 13 of the 15 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, while the AMD chip secures two narrow victories. The average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14450HX is 32040, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, whereas the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 averages 19617, landing at the 73rd percentile. This gap of roughly 63% in average score establishes a clear hierarchy, though the specific workloads where each processor excels tell a more nuanced story about their architectural priorities.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14450HX dominates virtually every multi-threaded and compute-heavy workload in the database. Its largest margin comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 20108 against the AMD chip's 8130, a delta of -59.6% from the AMD processor's perspective. Similar patterns appear across PassMark tests: floating point math shows Intel at 58037 versus 27193 (-53.1%), integer math at 78330 versus 39637 (-49.4%), and data encryption at 15574 versus 7591 (-51.3%). These are not marginal differences; the Intel part roughly doubles the AMD chip's output in several categories. The physics test follows the same trend, with Intel scoring 1475 against AMD's 726 (-50.8%), and find prime numbers shows Intel at 98 versus 44 (-55.1%). Random string sorting, data compression, and extended instructions all favor Intel by margins between -33.4% and -43.8%.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 wins only the PassMark single-thread test, scoring 3683 against Intel's 3643, a 1.1% advantage. This is a narrow victory, but it is consistent across both the "single_thread" and "singlethread" entries, which record identical scores. The Cinebench R15 single-core result also shows Intel ahead at 285 versus 269 (-5.6%), so the AMD chip's single-thread win does not extend to all single-core benchmarks. The data implies that AMD's strength lies in lightly threaded, latency-sensitive tasks, while Intel's advantage compounds rapidly as core count and thread utilization increase.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core i5-14450HX is part of the Core 14th Gen series, uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm node. It has 10 cores and 16 threads, which explains its massive multi-threaded advantage. The Intel die is listed at 257 mm², while the AMD chip has no die size recorded.

Cache configurations also differ sharply. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3. The Intel part has the same 80 KB L1 per core but doubles L2 to 2 MB per core and provides 20 MB of shared L3. That 5x difference in L3 capacity is a major factor in Intel's superior performance on data-heavy workloads like compression and sorting. Memory support diverges as well: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus but no bandwidth figure in the database. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs, with AMD offering Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only) versus Intel's Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 710.

The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, which the AMD chip does not, and it uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket versus AMD Socket FP8. TDP ratings diverge significantly: Intel is rated at 55, while AMD is rated at 28. This suggests the Intel part is designed for higher sustained power draw, which aligns with its larger core count and die size.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 reaches 4.50 GHz. The base clocks are 2.40 GHz for Intel and 2.00 GHz for AMD.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX scores 20108, which is 59.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430's 8130. This is the largest performance gap in the head-to-head data.

Q: Does the AMD chip win any benchmark at all?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 3683 against Intel's 3643, a 1.1% margin. This result appears twice in the database under slightly different test names.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core i5-14450HX has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor uses a more advanced manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14450HX uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14450HX has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification. Core and thread counts are the most obvious divergence: 4 cores and 8 threads for AMD versus 10 cores and 16 threads for Intel. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.40 GHz for Intel, while boost clocks are 4.50 GHz and 4.80 GHz respectively. TDP is 28 for AMD and 55 for Intel. The sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel BGA 1964.

Process node and foundry differ: AMD uses 4 nm at TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm at its own foundry. The Intel die size is 257 mm², with no die size recorded for AMD. Cache structures diverge in L2 and L3: both have 80 KB L1 per core, but AMD has 1 MB L2 per core versus Intel's 2 MB, and AMD has 4 MB L3 versus Intel's 20 MB shared. Memory support shows AMD accepting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel accepts DDR4 and DDR5; both use dual-channel buses, with AMD's bandwidth recorded at 89.6 GB/s and Intel's not listed. PCIe configurations differ: AMD has Gen 4 with 14 lanes, Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are Radeon 840M for AMD and UHD Graphics 710 for Intel. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, AMD does not. Release dates are also distinct: AMD was released on 2026-01-04, Intel on 2024-01-07. Part numbers are 100-000001787 for AMD and SRMXK for Intel.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench R23 multi-core test delivers the most decisive result. Intel scores 20108 against AMD's 8130, a 59.6% advantage. This is consistent with Cinebench R15 multi-core, where Intel leads 2026 to 1195, a 41% gap. The pattern holds across PassMark workloads: data compression shows Intel at 278538 versus 158912 (-42.9%), data encryption at 15574 versus 7591 (-51.3%), and extended instructions at 17207 versus 11455 (-33.4%). Find prime numbers gives Intel 98 versus 44 (-55.1%), and floating point math shows Intel at 58037 versus 27193 (-53.1%). Integer math follows at 78330 versus 39637 (-49.4%), and the multithread score is 23680 for Intel versus 13320 for AMD (-43.7%). Physics is 1475 versus 726 (-50.8%), and random string sorting is 29565 versus 16623 (-43.8%).

The single-thread results are closer. Cinebench R15 single-core has Intel at 285 versus AMD's 269, a 5.6% edge. Cinebench R23 single-core shows Intel at 2838 versus AMD's 1797, a 36.7% gap that contradicts the PassMark single-thread outcome. In PassMark single-thread, AMD wins with 3683 versus Intel's 3643, a 1.1% margin. This inconsistency between Cinebench and PassMark single-core results suggests that the AMD chip's architecture handles certain single-threaded instruction patterns more efficiently, even though its overall clock speed is lower.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear split in intended use cases. The Intel Core i5-14450HX is the superior processor for multi-threaded workloads, content creation, and any task that scales with core count. Its 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with 20 MB of L3 cache and a 55 TDP, allow it to deliver roughly double the performance of the AMD chip in encryption, floating point math, and physics simulations. The 82nd percentile ranking and average score of 32040 place it in a higher performance class entirely.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 occupies a different role. Its 28 TDP, 4 cores, and 4 MB L3 point to a design focused on efficiency and compact systems. The single PassMark single-thread win indicates that it can hold its own in lightly threaded scenarios, and its 73rd percentile ranking shows it is not a weak processor in absolute terms. However, the 59.6% deficit in Cinebench R23 multi-core and similar gaps across most PassMark tests mean it cannot match the Intel part in heavily parallel tasks.

The choice between the two depends on whether the workload prioritizes sustained multi-threaded throughput or lighter, more power-conscious operation. The Intel part wins the vast majority of recorded benchmarks and does so by wide margins, while the AMD chip's only victory is a 1.1% single-thread edge. For users who need maximum compute performance in a mobile form factor, the data strongly favors the Intel Core i5-14450HX. For those who value lower power draw and are willing to accept significantly lower multi-threaded scores, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 offers a more conservative alternative.