AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core 5 223PQE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Intel Core 5 223PQE. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors stand at zero. This absence of comparative data means any direct performance assessment must rely on the individual benchmark scores recorded for the AMD part and the architectural specifications of the Intel part.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a substantial set of recorded measurements. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24,565 in multi-core and 3,468 in single-core. Cinebench R20 results show 10,317 multi-core and 1,456 single-core. Cinebench R15 data indicates 2,476 multi-core and 349 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 28,572 and a single-thread score of 3,762. The data compression workload records 343,952, while data encryption reaches 20,487. Extended instructions produce 25,434, integer math scores 97,625, floating-point math scores 58,965, and find prime numbers yields 87. Random string sorting records 41,867, and physics scores 1,389.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. The AMD part holds a percentile of 86. The AMD processor's average benchmark score is 39,325. The nearest rivals for the AMD part provide context: the AMD EPYC 4245P averages 39,215 (0.3% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 averages 39,485 (0.4% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS averages 39,603 (0.7% ahead), and the Intel Core i7-13700F averages 39,009 (0.8% behind). These deltas show the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS sits within a tight cluster of comparable processors, all within roughly one percentage point of each other.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply on manufacturing process. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses a 4 nm node fabricated by TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses a 10 nm node fabricated by Intel. The AMD chip integrates 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel chip has no transistor count or die size recorded in the database.

Core and thread counts match: both offer 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds differ. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Thermal design power differs substantially. The AMD processor is rated at 45 watts, while the Intel processor is rated at 125 watts.

Cache layouts are distinct. The AMD part provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Neither part has a 3D V-Cache option listed.

Memory support separates the two as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also on a dual-channel bus with the same 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities differ: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD processor includes a Radeon 780M. The Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part belongs to the 8000 series with a Hawk Point codename and Zen 4 architecture. The Intel part carries a Bartlett Lake codename with no architecture field populated in the database. The AMD processor is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP7. The Intel processor is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS demonstrates measurable strengths across the PassMark workload suite. Data compression at 343,952 and integer math at 97,625 indicate strong throughput in compute-heavy tasks. Floating-point math at 58,965 and extended instructions at 25,434 suggest robust handling of scientific and vectorized workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,565 positions it as a capable multi-threaded performer. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,468 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,762 show competitive per-thread performance.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE cannot be scored from direct benchmarks, but its specifications imply advantages in certain scenarios. A higher base clock of 4.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz suggest potential for strong single-threaded responsiveness, though no measured data confirms this. The larger 24 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 could benefit workloads with repeated data access. Gen 5 PCIe support offers higher bandwidth potential for compatible peripherals. Dual memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility in platform configuration.

The absence of benchmark data for the Intel part means the database cannot confirm any workload-specific victory. The AMD part has verified wins in every recorded category, but those wins are only against the broader CPU population, not against the Intel part directly. The Intel part's 50th percentile versus all CPUs, compared to the AMD part's 86th percentile, indicates the AMD processor ranks higher in the overall distribution, but this is a population comparison rather than a direct pairwise result.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and the Intel Core 5 223PQE list ECC memory support as true.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: How do the power ratings compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125 watts.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS ranks in the 86th percentile versus all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 223PQE ranks in the 50th percentile versus all CPUs.

The Verdict

The database provides complete benchmark coverage for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and none for the Intel Core 5 223PQE. The AMD part's average benchmark score of 39,325 and 86th percentile ranking place it well above the Intel part's 50th percentile and zero average score. The AMD processor's nearest rivals, all within one percentage point of its average score, confirm it performs in a consistent band with other mid-range to upper-mid-range parts.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE presents a specification profile that suggests desktop-oriented design: a 125 watt TDP, Socket 1700, and Gen 5 PCIe support. Its higher clocks and larger caches could theoretically benefit certain workloads, but the absence of recorded measurements means no verified performance claim can be made. The AMD processor, by contrast, has verified multi-core and single-core scores across multiple Cinebench versions and a full PassMark suite.

From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only processor with measurable performance evidence. Its mobile segment designation, 45 watt TDP, and 4 nm process point to an efficient design. The Intel part's desktop segment, 125 watt TDP, and 10 nm process indicate a different intended use case. The data supports choosing the AMD part for verified performance and efficiency, while the Intel part remains an unmeasured quantity in this database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Intel Core 5 223PQE |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturing Process | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 125 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Not listed |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | Not listed |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $319 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 86 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 39,325 | 0 |