AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a surprisingly split picture between these two AMD mobile processors. While the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 claims more total wins at 9 against 6, the margin of victory tells a more nuanced story. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS delivers several decisive wins in heavily weighted CPU tests, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 tends to edge ahead in more specialized workloads.

Starting with multi-core performance, the results are contradictory across different Cinebench versions. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 2842 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS's 2476, a 14.8% lead. However, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the tables turn dramatically: the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 24565 versus 18698 for the Ryzen AI 9 365, a 23.9% advantage. This is a significant reversal, and the newer R23 test typically reflects more sustained, realistic workloads. The single-core results are even more one-sided. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS leads with 3468 against 1992, a massive 42.6% difference. The R15 single-core test shows a similar trend, with the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS ahead at 349 versus 303, a 13.2% gap.

Looking at the PassMark suite, the Ryzen AI 9 365 shows its strengths. It wins floating point math with 62802 versus 58965, a 6.5% edge. It takes integer math with 101831 versus 97625, a 4.3% lead. The data compression test goes to the Ryzen AI 9 365 at 354510 versus 343952, a 3.1% margin. The find prime numbers test shows a 34.5% win for the Ryzen AI 9 365 with 117 versus 87. Physics simulation also favors the Ryzen AI 9 365 at 1704 versus 1389, a 22.7% lead. The multithread test is close, but the Ryzen AI 9 365 wins 29467 to 28572, a 3.1% margin. Even single-thread performance in PassMark favors the Ryzen AI 9 365, scoring 3841 versus 3762, a 2.1% lead.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS answers back in specific areas. Data encryption shows it ahead with 20487 versus 18297, a 10.7% win. Extended instructions go to the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS at 25434 versus 25113, though only by 1.3%. Random string sorting favors the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS with 41867 versus 39447, a 5.8% edge.

The overall average benchmark score places the Ryzen AI 9 365 at 40048, against 39325 for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. The percentile rankings are close, with the Ryzen AI 9 365 at the 87th percentile and the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival data for the Ryzen AI 9 365 shows it nearly tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, which sits at an average score of 40081, a delta of -0.1%. For the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, its closest rival is the AMD EPYC 4245P with an average score of 39215, a delta of 0.3%.

Where Each One Wins

The use-case split is clear from the data. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the pick for heavily threaded, sustained workloads that stress the entire processor. Its 23.9% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 42.6% lead in R23 single-core point to a processor that handles both single-threaded responsiveness and multi-threaded rendering with authority. The data encryption win at 10.7% suggests it is well-suited for security-related tasks that rely on AES instructions and similar operations. The extended instructions win, while narrow at 1.3%, reinforces this. For random string sorting, the 5.8% advantage indicates it handles certain data manipulation tasks more efficiently.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 wins across a broader spread of workloads, but often by smaller margins. Its physics score advantage of 22.7% makes it a strong candidate for simulation tasks. The find prime numbers result, with a 34.5% lead, points to strong raw integer computation in specific algorithmic patterns. Floating point math at 6.5% ahead makes it suitable for scientific calculations and any workload relying on FPU throughput. Data compression is a practical win at 3.1%, which benefits file archiving and storage workloads. The multithread test win of 3.1% and the PassMark single-thread win of 2.1% show it is competitive across the board, even if it does not dominate any single headline test.

For a developer compiling code, the integer math advantage of 4.3% on the Ryzen AI 9 365 could translate to marginally faster build times. For a video editor using multi-core rendering, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS looks like the stronger option given its R23 multi-core dominance. For a user running diverse productivity tasks, the Ryzen AI 9 365's balanced profile with wins in 9 out of 15 head-to-head tests suggests consistent, if modest, performance across most scenarios.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The Ryzen AI 9 365 is built on Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Point, and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation that combines Zen 5 with Zen 5c cores. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, from the 8000 series. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node, so the lithography is identical.

The core configurations differ substantially. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. This gives the Ryzen AI 9 365 a two-core, four-thread advantage. The cache layouts reflect this difference. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 16 MB of L3 cache. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 64 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, also with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 on the Ryzen AI 9 365 could contribute to its PassMark single-thread win of 2.1%.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS runs at a 3.80 GHz base clock and a 5.10 GHz boost clock. The higher base clock on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS likely explains its massive single-core Cinebench leads. The thermal design power also differs, with the Ryzen AI 9 365 rated at 28 W and the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS at 45 W. This higher power envelope allows the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS to sustain higher clocks under load.

The sockets are different: the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses AMD Socket FP7. Die sizes vary, with the Ryzen AI 9 365 at 233 mm² and the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS at 178 mm². The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a listed transistor count of 25,000 million, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 does not have a published transistor count in the database. Memory support differs slightly, with the Ryzen AI 9 365 supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports DDR5 only. Both run dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 does not. PCIe lanes also differ: the Ryzen AI 9 365 offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Integrated graphics differentiate the two as well. The Ryzen AI 9 365 carries the Radeon 880M, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS carries the Radeon 780M. The Ryzen AI 9 365 shipped with a release date of 2024-06-30, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS released on 2024-04-15. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded in the database, and both are locked multipliers.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear recommendation based on workload. For users who prioritize single-core performance and sustained multi-core rendering, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the superior choice. Its 42.6% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and 23.9% lead in R23 multi-core are decisive. This processor also brings ECC memory support and more PCIe lanes, making it suitable for workstation-class laptops where reliability and expandability matter. The 45 W TDP indicates it is designed for systems that can manage higher thermals and power draw.

For users who value a balanced processor that wins more individual tests, the Ryzen AI 9 365 is the better fit. It delivers wins in 9 of 15 head-to-head benchmarks, including physics, prime number computation, floating point math, and integer math. Its 28 W TDP suggests it is more power-efficient, which matters for thin-and-light laptops where battery life and thermal headroom are at a premium. The larger die size and newer Zen 5 architecture point to a more modern design, even if the raw clock speeds are lower.

The benchmark results are not uniformly in favor of either chip. The Ryzen AI 9 365 wins the older Cinebench R15 multi-core test by 14.8%, but loses the newer R23 test by 23.9%. This discrepancy suggests the two processors respond differently to test methodology and workload duration. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS appears to sustain higher performance over longer multi-threaded sessions, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 may have an advantage in bursty, shorter workloads.

There is no single winner for all users. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the data-backed pick for content creators, developers running heavy multi-threaded builds, and professionals who need ECC memory. The Ryzen AI 9 365 is the better choice for general productivity, scientific computing with floating point emphasis, and users who want a more efficient processor for everyday tasks. The average benchmark scores are close, with a difference of only 723 points between them, which represents a 1.8% gap in the Ryzen AI 9 365's favor. The percentile rankings, 87 versus 86, confirm these are closely matched processors.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Why does the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS win Cinebench R23 multi-core by such a large margin?

A: The recorded data shows a 23.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS in this test. This likely stems from its higher base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz, combined with its 45 W TDP, which allows sustained high-frequency operation.

Q: Does the Ryzen AI 9 365 win any major multi-core tests?

A: Yes, it wins Cinebench R15 multi-core with 2842 versus 2476, a 14.8% margin. It also wins the PassMark multithread test with 29467 versus 28572, a 3.1% edge.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference?

A: The results are mixed. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins Cinebench R23 single-core by 42.6% and R15 single-core by 13.2%. However, the Ryzen AI 9 365 wins the PassMark single-thread test by 2.1%.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 does not.

Q: Which processor is better for physics simulations?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 wins the PassMark physics test with 1704 versus 1389, a 22.7% advantage, making it the stronger choice for physics-based workloads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 8 |

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | AMD Socket FP7 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Zen 4 |

| Codename | Strix Point | Hawk Point |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 25,000 million |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 178 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | Radeon 780M |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-04-15 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001530 | 100-000001316(FP7r2),100-000001387(FP7) |