AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core i5-14400F present a fascinating contrast in processor design philosophy. One is a mobile-focused, power-sipping part built on a leading-edge process, while the other is a desktop stalwart designed for sustained performance. The recorded data shows a clear split in their strengths, with the AMD chip winning 14 of the 17 direct benchmark comparisons, yet the Intel part claiming decisive victories in the most demanding CPU stress tests.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 establishes its dominance across a broad swath of computational workloads. Its wins include Geekbench multi-core and single-core tests, PassMark integer math, extended instructions, and data encryption. The margin of victory is often substantial, such as a 36% lead in the PassMark find prime numbers test and a 24.9% advantage in integer math. This pattern indicates a processor that excels in diverse, mixed workloads, from everyday productivity to complex calculations.

The Intel Core i5-14400F, while losing the overall benchmark count, secures its wins where it matters most for sustained heavy lifting. Its most significant victory is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it outperforms the AMD chip by 13.6%. It also takes the single-core crown in both Cinebench R15 and R23, with a notable 34.8% lead in the R23 single-core test. This suggests the Intel part is better suited for scenarios that rely on a single powerful core or require maximum sustained multi-threaded performance over a long period, a common trait of desktop processors with higher power limits. The data indicates a use-case split: the AMD processor for general versatility and efficiency, the Intel processor for peak performance in specific, high-intensity applications.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectural approaches. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Point, and is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, on Intel's 10 nm process. This process node difference is a key factor in their respective power and efficiency profiles, with the AMD chip having a 28 W TDP compared to the Intel chip's 65 W TDP.

Both processors have 10 cores, but their thread counts differ. The AMD chip supports 20 threads, while the Intel chip supports 16. The cache hierarchy also differs. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the Intel chip has a larger L2 cache at 1.25 MB per core compared to AMD's 1 MB per core. The L3 cache setup is also different: the AMD chip has 16 MB, while the Intel chip has 20 MB shared.

The memory support reveals another significant divergence. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also on a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth figure is not recorded in the database. The AMD chip also features a Radeon 880M integrated GPU, whereas the Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, a common distinction between mobile and desktop parts.

Platform features further differentiate them. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket FP8 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip supports ECC memory, while the AMD chip does not. The manufacturing details also show a difference in die size, with the AMD chip at 233 mm² and the Intel chip at 215 mm².

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results reveal a complex performance landscape. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 delivers a score of 2842, a 30.3% lead over the Intel Core i5-14400F's 2181. This is a major win for AMD. However, the tables turn in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where Intel scores 21645 against AMD's 18698, a 13.6% advantage. The difference between the R15 and R23 results is notable, suggesting the Intel chip can maintain higher performance in longer, more sustained workloads, while the AMD chip excels in shorter bursts.

The single-core results are also telling. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Intel chip wins by a narrow 1.3% margin, scoring 307 to AMD's 303. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel chip's advantage expands dramatically to 34.8%, scoring 3055 versus AMD's 1992. This large gap in the newer test indicates a significant single-thread performance advantage for the Intel architecture under this specific workload.

The Geekbench results swing back in AMD's favor. The Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 13760 in Geekbench multi-core, a 22.1% lead over the Intel chip's 11268. In Geekbench single-core, AMD also wins, scoring 2253 to Intel's 2058, a 9.5% advantage. This shows that in some multi-core and single-core metrics, the AMD chip is clearly superior.

The PassMark suite shows a consistent pattern of AMD victories. In PassMark multithread, AMD scores 29467, a 15.7% lead. In integer math, AMD scores 101831, a 24.9% lead. In extended instructions, AMD scores 25113, a 26% lead. The only close PassMark result is floating point math, where AMD's 62802 narrowly beats Intel's 61319, a 2.4% margin. The data confirms that the AMD processor is more efficient in a wide range of computational tasks, while the Intel processor's strengths are concentrated in the Cinebench suite.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets for the two processors highlight their distinct market positions. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The AMD chip has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel chip has a 65 W TDP. This difference is central to their intended use cases: the AMD chip is designed for the mobile segment, while the Intel chip is a desktop part.

The memory support differs, with the AMD chip supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip's memory bandwidth is recorded as 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the AMD chip. The PCIe support also differs, with the AMD chip on Gen 4 and the Intel chip on Gen 5.

The integrated graphics are a major difference. The AMD chip includes a Radeon 880M, while the Intel chip has no integrated graphics. This makes the AMD chip a more complete package for systems without a discrete GPU. The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-14400F is $196; the AMD chip's launch MSRP is not recorded. The release dates also differ, with the AMD chip released on 2024-06-30 and the Intel chip on 2024-01-07.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a higher average benchmark score of 40048, compared to the Intel Core i5-14400F's 32279.

Q: How do they compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F wins this test with a score of 21645, which is 13.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365's score of 18698.

Q: Does the AMD processor have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 includes a Radeon 880M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the difference in their thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has 16 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 does not.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for the AMD chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The memory bandwidth for the Intel chip is not recorded.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the more versatile processor, winning 14 of 17 comparisons and achieving a higher average benchmark score (40048 vs 32279). It dominates in Geekbench and most PassMark tests, making it the better choice for general computing, mixed workloads, and tasks that benefit from its 20 threads and higher boost clock. Its integrated Radeon 880M GPU and lower 28 W TDP also make it a suitable option for compact or mobile systems.

The Intel Core i5-14400F, despite its lower overall win count, shows a clear advantage in the Cinebench R23 tests, especially in single-core where it leads by 34.8%. This indicates it is the stronger part for applications that rely heavily on single-thread performance or for sustained multi-core workloads as measured by Cinebench R23. Its support for PCIe Gen 5 and ECC memory, along with its desktop socket, positions it for traditional desktop builds where those features are required. The choice between the two comes down to the specific workload and platform requirements.