AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS

CORE STATE Rembrandt-R
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3+
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

CORE STATE Krackan Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,243
2,336.5
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
175
247
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
5,183
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
731
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
12,342
14,278.5
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,742
1,954
passmark_data_compression
168,692
281,834
passmark_data_encryption
10,718
14,462
passmark_extended_instructions
11,219
19,955
passmark_find_prime_numbers
48
81
passmark_floating_point_math
27,800
51,639
passmark_integer_math
50,800
84,868
passmark_multithread
14,520
23,994
passmark_physics
821
1,318
passmark_random_string_sorting
17,669
31,071
passmark_single_thread
2,740
3,872
passmark_singlethread
2,740
3,872

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 are both active mobile processors from AMD, but the recorded benchmark data separates them clearly. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins all 15 head-to-head comparisons in the database, with 15 wins against 0 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. Its average benchmark score is 35719, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS averages 19364. In the global percentile ranking, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, and the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits at the 73rd percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

All 15 head-to-head results favor the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. The largest margin is in Cinebench R15 multicore, where the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 2336.5 against 1243 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 46.8 percent advantage. PassMark floating point math is nearly as wide: 51639 versus 27800, a 46.2 percent gap. Extended instructions show a 43.8 percent lead (19955 versus 11219), random string sorting shows a 43.1 percent lead (31071 versus 17669), and find prime numbers shows a 40.7 percent lead (81 versus 48). Data compression and integer math both come in at 40.1 percent, with scores of 281834 versus 168692 and 84868 versus 50800 respectively.

The multithread PassMark score is 23994 versus 14520, a 39.5 percent difference, and the physics score is 1318 versus 821, a 37.7 percent difference. Single-thread PassMark is 3872 versus 2740, a 29.2 percent difference, matching the Cinebench R15 single-core gap of 247 versus 175 at 29.1 percent. Data encryption is 14462 versus 10718, a 25.9 percent lead. The Cinebench R23 gaps are smaller but still one-sided: 14278.5 versus 12342 in multi-core, a 13.6 percent lead, and 1954 versus 1742 in single-core, a 10.8 percent lead.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 in every measured category. It holds the higher average benchmark score (35719 versus 19364), the higher global percentile (85 versus 73), and all 15 direct head-to-head wins. The nearest rival data places the two processors in different performance tiers. The Ryzen 5 7533HS is 0.7 percent ahead of the Intel Core i7-8700K, 0.7 percent behind the Intel Core i7-10700F, 0.2 percent behind the Intel Core i5-1345U, and tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is tied with the Intel Core 7 250H, 0.1 percent ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 0.2 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, and 0.5 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X.

For a user choosing strictly from the benchmark data, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the faster processor. The Ryzen 5 7533HS remains an active mobile chip with its own platform specifications, but it does not win any head-to-head test in this comparison.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head results create a one-sided use-case split. Multi-threaded workloads such as Cinebench R15 multicore and Cinebench R23 multicore go to the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. Single-threaded workloads also go to the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, with wins in Cinebench R15 single-core, Cinebench R23 single-core, and PassMark single-thread. Data and math workloads follow the same pattern: data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number search, floating point math, integer math, physics, random string sorting, and multithread PassMark all favor the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS has no recorded benchmark wins, so no measured workload category favors it. At the specification level, the Ryzen 5 7533HS does list a larger shared L3 cache (16 MB versus 8 MB) and more CPU PCIe lanes (20 versus 16), but these specification advantages do not appear as performance wins in the recorded head-to-head data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins all 15 recorded head-to-head comparisons. The Ryzen 5 7533HS records 0 wins.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in Cinebench R15 multicore, where the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 2336.5 against 1243 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 46.8 percent difference.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which chip has the higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 boosts to 5.00, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS boosts to 4.40. The 7533HS has a higher base clock at 3.30 versus 2.00.

Q: Do the two chips support ECC memory?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 lists ECC memory support as true. The Ryzen 5 7533HS lists ECC memory support as false.

Q: Which chip has more L3 cache?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 MB of L3 cache, but it has 1 MB of L2 per core versus 512 KB per core, and 80 KB of L1 per core versus 64 KB.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural points in AMD's mobile lineup. The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Zen 3+ with the Rembrandt-R codename and belongs to the 7000 series. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses Zen 5 with the Krackan Point codename, and its generation entry is Ryzen AI PRO 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). The manufacturing process is 6 nm for the 7533HS and 4 nm for the AI 7 PRO 350, both from TSMC. The die sizes are close: 208 mm² for the 7533HS and 195 mm² for the AI 7 PRO 350.

The cache layouts are different. The 7533HS provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The AI 7 PRO 350 provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The AI 7 PRO 350 also supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the 7533HS lists DDR5 only. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the AI 7 PRO 350 and 76.8 GB/s for the 7533HS. The AI 7 PRO 350 lists ECC memory support as true; the 7533HS lists it as false. On the PCIe side, the 7533HS has Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), and the AI 7 PRO 350 has Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are the Radeon 660M for the 7533HS and the Radeon 860M for the AI 7 PRO 350. The sockets are AMD Socket FP7 and AMD Socket FP8 respectively, and the release dates are 2024-08-31 and 2025-01-05.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base clock | 3.30 | 2.00 |

| Boost clock | 4.40 | 5.00 |

| TDP | 35 | 28 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen 5 |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Krackan Point |

| Process node | 6 nm | 4 nm |

| Die size | 208 mm² | 195 mm² |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 512 KB per core | 1 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB shared | 8 MB |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC memory | false | true |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 660M | Radeon 860M |

| Release date | 2024-08-31 | 2025-01-05 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 7533HS
AI 7 PRO 350
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
2 -39.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.4
5 +13.6%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
2 -39.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.4
5 +13.6%
Multiplier
33
20 -39.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
8 MB
Power
TDP (W)
35
28 -20.0%
Configurable TDP
35-54 W
15-54 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3+
Zen 5
Codename
Rembrandt-R
Krackan Point
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))
Ryzen AI PRO 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Process Size
6 nm
4 nm
Die Size
208 mm²
195 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP7
AMD Socket FP8
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
4 + 4
E-Core Frequency
—
2000 MHz up to 3.5 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
—
Yes / 50 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 660M
Radeon 860M
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2)
100-000000713
Package
FP7, FP7r2
FP8
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen 5 7533HS Details View Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Details