AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and the Intel Core i5-14501E take different paths to similar overall positions, but direct benchmark comparisons are limited by the database. The AMD part has a full suite of recorded scores; the Intel part has no individual benchmark entries in the database. What can be analyzed is the AMD chip's absolute performance profile and its standing against the nearest rivals listed in the database, which includes two Intel parts and two AMD desktop parts.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14278.5 and a single-core score of 1954. In Cinebench R15, it records 2336.5 multi-core and 247 single-core. These results place the chip at the 85th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 35719 sits within a tight cluster of rivals: the Intel Core 7 250H averages 35728 (0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H averages 35670 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 averages 35802 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X averages 35909 (0.5% behind). The AMD mobile chip is effectively within noise of all four rivals, with a spread of less than 1% across the group.

In PassMark tests, the AMD part shows strength in specific workloads. It scores 84868 in integer math, 51639 in floating point math, and 19955 in extended instructions. Data compression reaches 281834, while encryption hits 14462. The multi-thread score is 23994, and the single-thread score is 3872. Random string sorting records 31071, physics reaches 1318, and find prime numbers scores 81.

The Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which means the head-to-head comparison cannot rely on direct measured results. The database does list its percentile at 50, compared to the AMD chip's 85th percentile, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. That percentile gap suggests the AMD part sits well above the Intel part in the overall distribution of all CPUs, but without individual Intel scores, the specific deltas cannot be quantified. The Intel part also has no nearest rivals listed, so no relative comparisons are available for it.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 beat the Intel Core i5-14501E in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark results between the two. The AMD chip records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14278.5 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 23994, but the Intel part has no recorded scores. The AMD chip sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile, which indicates a substantial overall performance gap in the database's distribution.

Q: Which chip has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part provides two additional cores and four additional threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14501E has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part starts at a higher base frequency and boosts slightly higher, while the AMD part has a lower base frequency.

Q: How does the AMD chip compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has an average benchmark score of 35719. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core 7 250H at 35728 (0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H at 35670 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 at 35802 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X at 35909 (0.5% behind). All five chips are within 0.5% of each other.

Q: Do both chips support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 lists ECC memory support as true, and the Intel Core i5-14501E also lists ECC memory support as true. Both support error-correcting memory.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two chips use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Radeon 860M. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses the UHD Graphics 770. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores for either part.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Krackan Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The die size is 195 mm². The Intel Core i5-14501E uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. It belongs to the Core i5 generation described as Raptor Lake Refresh. The die size is 215 mm².

The cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 per core but 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has three times the L3 capacity, which can benefit workloads with large working sets that fit in cache. The AMD part has a smaller total cache footprint but uses a newer process node.

The core counts also differ. The AMD chip has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel chip has 6 cores and 12 threads. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe support differs by generation. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part provides a newer PCIe generation, which matters for storage and expansion bandwidth.

The AMD chip is a mobile part using the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip is a desktop part using the Intel Socket 1700. Their market segments are different, which affects the systems they target. The AMD chip draws 28 W TDP, while the Intel chip draws 65 W TDP. The AMD part is designed for lower power envelopes, while the Intel part is a conventional desktop processor with a higher thermal budget.

Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part's production status is Active, and the Intel part's production status is also Active. The AMD part was released on 2025-01-05, while the Intel part was released on 2024-06-30. The part numbers are 100-000000713 for AMD and Q49HSRNJM for Intel.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear segmentation between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is a mobile processor with 8 cores, 16 threads, and a 28 W TDP, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It records strong benchmark scores across the board and sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-14501E is a desktop processor with 6 cores, 12 threads, and a 65 W TDP, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. It sits at the 50th percentile of all CPUs in the database, and it has no recorded benchmark scores.

The AMD chip's average benchmark score of 35719 places it in a tie with several strong rivals, including the Intel Core 7 250H and the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H. The Intel chip's average score is listed as 0, which is not a meaningful measurement but does indicate the absence of recorded data. The percentile gap from 85 to 50 is substantial and suggests the AMD part is positioned significantly higher in the overall performance distribution.

For users who need a low-power mobile processor with 8 cores and strong multi-threaded performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the part the data supports. It has a modern 4 nm process, 16 threads, and a compact 195 mm² die. For users who need a desktop processor with a higher base clock, a higher boost clock, more L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 support, the Intel Core i5-14501E offers those specific features. The Intel part has a 5.20 GHz boost clock versus 5.00 GHz on the AMD part, and 24 MB of L3 versus 8 MB.

The database does not provide direct comparison scores, so a definitive performance winner cannot be stated from head-to-head measurements. The available data shows the AMD chip with a much higher percentile ranking and a full suite of competitive benchmark results. The Intel chip's lack of recorded scores means its performance must be inferred from its specifications alone.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded fields:

• Cores: AMD 8, Intel 6
• Threads: AMD 16, Intel 12
• Base clock: AMD 2.00 GHz, Intel 3.30 GHz
• Boost clock: AMD 5.00 GHz, Intel 5.20 GHz
• TDP: AMD 28 W, Intel 65 W
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8, Intel Socket 1700
• Architecture: Zen 5, Raptor Lake
• Codename: Krackan Point, Raptor Lake-R
• Generation: Ryzen AI PRO 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
• Process node: AMD 4 nm, Intel 10 nm
• Foundry: TSMC, Intel
• Die size: AMD 195 mm², Intel 215 mm²
• L2 cache per core: AMD 1 MB, Intel 1.25 MB
• L3 cache: AMD 8 MB, Intel 24 MB (shared)
• Memory support: AMD DDR5, LPDDR5X; Intel DDR4, DDR5
• Memory bandwidth: AMD 89.6 GB/s, Intel not listed
• PCIe: AMD Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only); Intel Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only)
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 860M, UHD Graphics 770
• Market segment: Mobile, Desktop
• Release date: AMD 2025-01-05, Intel 2024-06-30

Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, dual-channel memory buses, ECC memory support, and locked multipliers. Neither has a listed launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins in multi-threaded core count. With 8 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads, it provides more parallel processing capacity. Its recorded Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14278.5 and PassMark multi-thread score of 23994 demonstrate strong throughput. Its 28 W TDP makes it suitable for compact mobile systems where power efficiency is a priority. The 4 nm TSMC process node indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology. Its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded figure that supports memory-intensive workloads. The 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the upper tier of the database.

The Intel Core i5-14501E wins in raw clock speeds. It has a 3.30 GHz base clock versus 2.00 GHz, and a 5.20 GHz boost clock versus 5.00 GHz. Higher clocks can benefit lightly threaded workloads that depend on single-core speed. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache is three times larger than the AMD part's 8 MB, which helps workloads with large, repeatedly accessed data sets. The Intel part supports PCIe Gen 5, which provides a newer standard for high-bandwidth devices like NVMe storage and GPUs. It also supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which expands compatibility with existing desktop platforms. The 65 W TDP, while higher, is typical for a desktop part with a larger thermal envelope.

The database does not include head-to-head benchmark results between these two specific chips, so the wins described above come from the specification differences and the AMD part's recorded scores. The Intel part's lack of benchmark data means its actual performance in these areas cannot be confirmed from the database. The clear split is by market segment: the AMD part is a mobile processor with lower power draw and more cores, while the Intel part is a desktop processor with higher clocks, more cache, and a newer PCIe standard.