AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Core i7-14701TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Intel Core i7-14701TE
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark data splits these two processors into distinct performance profiles. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins 11 of the 15 recorded head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE takes 4. The margins, however, tell a more nuanced story than the raw win count.
The AMD part delivers its largest victories in single-threaded and integer-heavy workloads. In the PassMark single-thread test, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 3872 against Intel's 2637, a 46.8% advantage. That is the single biggest delta in the entire comparison. The extended instructions test shows a 39% lead (19955 vs 14354), and random string sorting goes AMD's way by 36.5% (31071 vs 22760). Data compression favors AMD at 281834 versus 220520, a 27.8% gap, while integer math lands at 84868 versus 65792, or 29% ahead.
The Cinebench R15 multicore result also belongs to AMD: 2336.5 versus 1716, a 36.2% margin. The R15 single-core test is close, with AMD ahead by just 2.1% (247 vs 242). Data encryption shows AMD leading 14462 to 11699, a 23.6% gap, and floating-point math is nearly even, 51639 vs 50219, a 2.8% edge for AMD. The PassMark multithread score goes to AMD as well, 23994 versus 20042, a 19.7% difference.
Intel's wins are concentrated in specific workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore test goes to Intel by a substantial margin: 17035 versus 14278.5, a 16.2% lead. The R23 single-core test also favors Intel, 2405 versus 1954, an 18.8% gap. In PassMark physics, Intel scores 1860 against AMD's 1318, a 29.1% advantage. The find prime numbers test is Intel's largest win: 143 versus 81, a 43.4% margin.
The aggregate picture is clear. AMD dominates most measured categories, but Intel holds decisive leads in the newer Cinebench versions and in physics simulation. The average benchmark score for AMD sits at 35719, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Intel's average is 26013, in the 78th percentile. AMD's nearest rival by average score is the Intel Core 7 250H at 35728 (0% delta), while Intel's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 at 25981 (0.1% delta).
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread performance in PassMark?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 3872 in PassMark single-thread, which is 46.8% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701TE's 2637.
Q: Where does Intel beat AMD by the largest margin?
A: Intel's biggest win is in PassMark find prime numbers, where it scores 143 versus AMD's 81, a 43.4% advantage.
Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multicore?
A: Intel leads with 17035 versus AMD's 14278.5, a 16.2% gap in favor of the Core i7-14701TE.
Q: Which chip has the higher boost clock?
A: Intel boosts to 5.20 GHz, while AMD boosts to 5.00 GHz.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and the Intel Core i7-14701TE support ECC memory.
Q: What are the process node differences?
A: AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own fabs.
Architecture Differences
The two chips come from fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD's Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture, with a hybrid arrangement of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores under the Krackan Point codename. The processor is built on TSMC's 4 nm node and measures 195 mm². Intel's Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm².
Cache layouts differ substantially. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core on AMD, but Intel doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is where the gap widens: AMD has 8 MB total, while Intel has 33 MB shared. That larger L3 pool likely contributes to Intel's strong Cinebench R23 performance despite its older process node.
Memory support also diverges. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel. AMD lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; Intel does not have a recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database. PCIe generation differs as well: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.
Integrated graphics separate the two further. AMD uses the Radeon 860M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Both processors are locked, meaning the multiplier is not unlocked. AMD's market segment is mobile, Intel's is desktop. AMD's socket is FP8, Intel's is Socket 1700. AMD released on 2025-01-05, Intel on 2024-06-30.
Specification Differences
The table below lists only the fields where the two processors differ.
| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Intel Core i7-14701TE |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.20 GHz |
| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |
| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Raptor Lake-R |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Die Size | 195 mm² | 257 mm² |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 33 MB (shared) |
| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |
| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 860M | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-06-30 |
Both processors have 8 cores and 16 threads, support ECC memory, and are not multiplier-unlocked.
The Verdict
The data points to two different usage profiles. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the stronger all-around performer in most measured workloads, with a 46.8% lead in PassMark single-thread and wins in 11 of 15 tests. Its 85th percentile ranking and 35719 average score place it clearly above Intel's 78th percentile and 26013 average. The 28 W TDP and mobile socket indicate a design aimed at efficient, portable systems.
The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins where sustained multi-core and physics workloads matter. Its Cinebench R23 results are significantly better, 17035 versus 14278.5, and it leads in physics by 29.1%. The 45 W TDP and desktop socket suggest a part intended for always-plugged-in systems where power draw is less critical.
For general productivity, data compression, encryption, and single-thread responsiveness, the AMD chip delivers better results. For rendering workloads that scale with the newer Cinebench version, and for physics simulation, Intel holds the advantage. The choice depends entirely on the workload mix.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins in these categories:
- PassMark single-thread: 46.8% ahead (3872 vs 2637)
- PassMark extended instructions: 39% ahead (19955 vs 14354)
- Cinebench R15 multicore: 36.2% ahead (2336.5 vs 1716)
- PassMark random string sorting: 36.5% ahead (31071 vs 22760)
- PassMark integer math: 29% ahead (84868 vs 65792)
- PassMark data compression: 27.8% ahead (281834 vs 220520)
- PassMark data encryption: 23.6% ahead (14462 vs 11699)
- PassMark multithread: 19.7% ahead (23994 vs 20042)
- PassMark floating-point math: 2.8% ahead (51639 vs 50219)
- Cinebench R15 single-core: 2.1% ahead (247 vs 242)
The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins in these categories:
- PassMark find prime numbers: 43.4% ahead (143 vs 81)
- PassMark physics: 29.1% ahead (1860 vs 1318)
- Cinebench R23 single-core: 18.8% ahead (2405 vs 1954)
- Cinebench R23 multicore: 16.2% ahead (17035 vs 14278.5)
The split is clean. AMD excels in general integer work, encryption, compression, and single-thread responsiveness. Intel dominates in prime-number finding, physics, and the R23 rendering tests. A system builder prioritizing spreadsheet, database, and compression tasks should favor AMD. One running physics simulations or rendering with Cinebench R23 should favor Intel.