AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head measurements between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H. However, the recorded data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H provides a substantial body of performance metrics, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 currently has no benchmark scores logged. This asymmetry means the comparison relies entirely on the Intel part's measured results and the architectural and specification differences recorded for both processors.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 and a single-core score of 3387. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 10076 with a single-core score of 1422. The older Cinebench R15 workload shows a multi-core score of 2418 and a single-core score of 341. These figures establish a clear performance baseline for the Intel processor across three generations of the Cinebench suite.

PassMark results for the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H show a multi-thread score of 28545 and a single-thread score of 4013. The integer math workload records 62070, while floating point math reaches 82415. Data compression scores 280340, data encryption scores 21291, and extended instructions score 24542. The find prime numbers test returns 299, physics scores 2682, and random string sorting scores 34402.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H holds an average benchmark score of 34485, placing it at the 84th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i7-13700HX with an average score of 34554 (a delta of -0.2%), the Intel Core i5-13450HX at 34333 (delta +0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X at 34260 (delta +0.7%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 at 34222 (delta +0.8%). The Ultra 5 336H sits within a narrow band of roughly one percent of these four comparable processors, indicating that its measured performance is closely grouped with established desktop and mobile parts from both vendors.

Because the Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmarks, no direct wins can be assigned to either processor in the database. The wins counter shows zero for both sides. The analysis therefore depends on the architectural and specification records rather than measured performance data for the AMD part.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the only processor of the two with measured performance results. Its 84th percentile ranking and average score of 34485 place it firmly in the upper-middle range of all CPUs tracked in the database. The Ryzen 3 110, with no benchmark scores logged and a 50th percentile ranking, cannot be positioned against the Intel part using measured data.

From the recorded specifications, the Intel processor offers 16 cores and 16 threads, a 4.60 GHz boost clock, 18 MB of shared L3 cache, and 115.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The AMD processor offers 4 cores and 8 threads, a 4.30 GHz boost clock, 8 MB of shared L3 cache, and 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Every performance-relevant specification recorded in the database favors the Intel part, but the absence of AMD benchmark data prevents a definitive performance verdict.

A user choosing strictly from the database records would select the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H if measured performance is the priority, as it is the only part with validated scores. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 remains an unknown quantity in the benchmark database, so any decision in its favor would lack supporting measurements.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die size is recorded at 210 mm². The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses the Panther Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel. No die size is recorded for the Intel part.

The Ryzen 3 110 integrates Radeon 660M graphics, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H integrates Intel Xe3 Graphics. Both processors are designed for mobile segments and both are currently marked as Active in production status. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The cache organization differs substantially. The AMD part allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part allocates 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel figures represent a larger cache hierarchy at every level, which aligns with its higher core count.

The Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H does not. This is a functional difference that could matter in specific reliability-focused workloads, though the database records no benchmark data to quantify its impact.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ sharply. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part does not use simultaneous multithreading, as its thread count equals its core count, whereas the AMD part doubles its threads through SMT.

Base clocks show 3.00 GHz for the AMD part and 1.90 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks show 4.30 GHz for AMD and 4.60 GHz for Intel. The Intel processor therefore has a higher maximum clock but a lower base clock.

Thermal design power is recorded at 28 W for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and 25 W for the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H. The Intel part delivers more cores and a higher boost clock within a lower TDP envelope according to the recorded figures.

Memory support differs in type and bandwidth. The AMD part supports DDR5 with dual-channel operation and 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also dual-channel, with 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel memory bandwidth figure is approximately 50% higher.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part offers more lanes but an older generation, while the Intel part offers fewer lanes at a newer generation.

Sockets differ: AMD Socket FP7 for the Ryzen 3 110, Intel BGA 2540 for the Core Ultra 5 336H. Release dates are recorded as 2025-09-30 for the AMD part and 2026-01-04 for the Intel part. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores in the database records?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the performance ranking of the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 34485.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 3 110, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H does not.

Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H in the database?

A: The nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13700HX (average score 34554, delta -0.2%), Intel Core i5-13450HX (34333, delta +0.4%), AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (34260, delta +0.7%), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (34222, delta +0.8%).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins in every category where the database has recorded measurements. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 and single-core score of 3387 demonstrate strong performance across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 4013 and multi-thread score of 28545 confirm this pattern. The 84th percentile ranking places it ahead of 84% of all CPUs tracked in the database, and its average score of 34485 is within one percent of the four nearest rivals listed, including the Intel Core i7-13700HX and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded wins because it has no recorded benchmark data. Its specifications suggest certain strengths, however. The 4-core, 8-thread configuration with a 3.00 GHz base clock and 28 W TDP indicates a lower-power design. The ECC memory support is a feature the Intel part lacks. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes exceed the Intel part's 12 lanes, which could support more simultaneous I/O devices. The smaller 210 mm² die size on a 6 nm process, compared to the Intel part's unrecorded die size on a 3 nm process, reflects a different manufacturing approach.

For workloads, the Intel processor's 16 cores and 16 threads make it the clear choice for multi-threaded rendering, compilation, and content creation tasks based on its Cinebench multi-core results. Its higher single-core scores in both Cinebench and PassMark indicate an advantage in single-threaded applications as well. The higher memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s supports memory-intensive workloads.

The AMD processor would be selected in scenarios where ECC memory is required, since the Intel part lacks that capability. Its lower TDP of 28 W, while higher than the Intel part's 25 W on paper, comes with far fewer cores, suggesting a different power profile in practice. The AMD part's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes offer more expansion capability than the Intel part's 12 Gen 5 lanes, though the newer generation on the Intel side provides higher per-lane bandwidth.

Ultimately, the database records show a complete performance profile for the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H and no profile for the AMD Ryzen 3 110. Any workload-based decision between the two must rely on the measured results for the Intel part and the architectural specifications for the AMD part, with the Intel processor holding the advantage in every measured and specified performance category except ECC support and PCIe lane count.