AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core i9-14901KE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i9-14901KE. Neither processor has any associated benchmark scores, average scores, or nearest rival data. The wins counter for each processor is zero, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. This means there is no measured performance data to compare directly between the two parts.

What the database does show is that both processors hold an identical percentile ranking of 50 against all CPUs. This percentile field indicates the midpoint of the distribution, meaning that within the database's ranking system, both parts sit exactly at the median position. However, with an average benchmark score of zero recorded for each, the percentile values are not supported by any actual performance measurements in the current dataset. The absence of scores makes any numerical comparison impossible, and the percentile values should be interpreted as placeholders rather than evidence of comparable performance.

The lack of benchmark data is notable given the substantial architectural differences between the two processors. The Ryzen 3 110 is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile part with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Core i9-14901KE is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The core count difference alone suggests that the Intel part would have a significant advantage in multi-threaded workloads, while the higher boost clock on the Intel side also points to a likely single-thread advantage. However, without benchmark scores in the database, these expectations remain speculative.

The thermal design power figures differ substantially. The Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Core i9-14901KE has a TDP of 125 watts. This 97-watt difference indicates that the Intel processor requires considerably more cooling and power delivery, which is consistent with its higher core count and clock speeds. The database records these TDP values as specifications, not as performance metrics, so they do not directly translate into benchmark comparisons.

FAQ

Q: Do the database benchmarks show which processor is faster?

A: No. The database contains no benchmark scores for either the AMD Ryzen 3 110 or the Intel Core i9-14901KE. The average benchmark score for each processor is zero, and there are no head-to-head benchmark results recorded.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901KE has 8 cores and 16 threads, which is double the core count and double the thread count of the AMD part.

Q: What are the clock speeds recorded in the database?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Core i9-14901KE has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The Intel processor has a higher base clock by 0.80 GHz and a higher boost clock by 1.50 GHz.

Q: What cache configurations do the two processors use?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i9-14901KE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches and more than four times the L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Core i9-14901KE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also with a dual-channel memory bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database.

Q: Which processor has an unlocked multiplier?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 does not have an unlocked multiplier. Both processors support ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, representing a mobile-focused design. The Intel Core i9-14901KE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, representing a desktop-focused design from Intel's Core 14th generation.

The manufacturing processes differ significantly. The Ryzen 3 110 is built on a 6 nm process node at TSMC, with a die size of 210 mm². The Core i9-14901KE is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The TSMC 6 nm node is denser than Intel's 10 nm node, which partially explains how AMD fits its design into a smaller die area despite having fewer cores. The Intel die is 47 mm² larger, which accommodates the additional cores, larger caches, and higher clock speeds.

Cache architecture reveals a major design divergence. The Ryzen 3 110 uses 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with a shared 8 MB L3 cache. The Core i9-14901KE uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, with a shared 36 MB L3 cache. The Intel processor's L2 cache is four times larger per core, and its L3 cache is 28 MB larger in total. These cache differences are substantial and would likely influence performance in cache-sensitive workloads, though no benchmark data confirms this in the database.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M integrated GPU, while the Core i9-14901KE includes UHD Graphics 770. Both processors support ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer parts and indicates some workstation-oriented capability.

PCIe support also differs. The Ryzen 3 110 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Core i9-14901KE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part offers the newer PCIe generation but with fewer lanes, while the AMD part offers the previous generation with more lanes.

Specification Differences

The socket types differ completely. The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket. The Core i9-14901KE uses Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop socket. This means the two processors are not interchangeable in any system.

The market segments differ. The Ryzen 3 110 is classified as a Mobile processor, while the Core i9-14901KE is classified as a Desktop processor. This aligns with their socket types and intended use cases.

The TDP ratings differ by 97 watts. The Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Core i9-14901KE has a TDP of 125 watts. This is a significant difference in power requirements.

The process nodes differ, with the AMD part on 6 nm TSMC and the Intel part on 10 nm Intel. The die sizes differ by 47 mm², with the AMD part at 210 mm² and the Intel part at 257 mm².

The core and thread counts differ. The Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Core i9-14901KE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

The clock speeds differ. The Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Core i9-14901KE has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

The cache configurations differ across all levels. The L1 cache per core is 64 KB on the AMD part and 80 KB on the Intel part. The L2 cache per core is 512 KB on the AMD part and 2 MB on the Intel part. The shared L3 cache is 8 MB on the AMD part and 36 MB on the Intel part.

Memory support differs. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only, while the Core i9-14901KE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is recorded for the Intel part.

PCIe support differs. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The multiplier unlock status differs. The Ryzen 3 110 is locked, while the Core i9-14901KE is unlocked.

The release dates differ. The Ryzen 3 110 has a release date of September 30, 2025. The Core i9-14901KE has a release date of June 30, 2024. The Intel processor was released over a year earlier.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD part uses Radeon 660M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

The part numbers also differ, with the AMD part listed as 100-000000549(FP7r2) and the Intel part listed as Q49DSRNJC.

The Verdict

The database provides no benchmark scores for either processor, so any performance verdict must rely entirely on the recorded specifications. The Intel Core i9-14901KE offers double the core count and double the thread count of the AMD Ryzen 3 110. It also has a higher base clock by 0.80 GHz and a higher boost clock by 1.50 GHz. The Intel part has larger caches at every level, with 16 KB more L1 cache per core, 1.5 MB more L2 cache per core, and 28 MB more L3 cache overall. These specification advantages point strongly toward the Intel processor being the faster part in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has the advantage in power efficiency. Its TDP of 28 watts is 97 watts lower than the Intel part's 125 watts. The AMD part also has a smaller die at 210 mm² compared to 257 mm², and it uses a denser 6 nm process from TSMC. For mobile applications where power consumption and heat dissipation are primary concerns, the Ryzen 3 110 is the more suitable choice based on the recorded data.

The two processors serve entirely different market segments. The Ryzen 3 110 is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP7, while the Core i9-14901KE is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. They are not interchangeable, and the choice between them would be dictated primarily by the platform rather than by direct comparison. The Intel part targets desktop systems with adequate cooling and power delivery, while the AMD part targets mobile systems where the 28-watt TDP is a practical advantage.

The Core i9-14901KE also has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Ryzen 3 110 is locked. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports DDR5 only. Both support ECC memory. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

For a desktop user seeking maximum processing capability, the data points to the Core i9-14901KE as the stronger option. Its higher core count, higher clocks, and larger caches are all recorded in the database. For a mobile user prioritizing low power consumption, the Ryzen 3 110 is the only viable option of the two, given its mobile socket and 28-watt TDP. The database does not contain benchmark data to validate these expectations, but the specification differences are clear and substantial.