AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core i9-14901KE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and the Intel Core i9-14901KE. The Intel processor has an empty benchmark array, meaning no Cinebench or PassMark scores are available for it in the database. The AMD processor, by contrast, has a full suite of 17 recorded benchmark results across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark workloads.

For the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, the strongest results appear in multi-threaded and content-creation workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,565 points places it well ahead of its single-core result of 3,468 points, a ratio that indicates strong scaling across its 8 cores and 16 threads. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10,317 and R15 multicore score of 2,476 follow the same pattern. In PassMark tests, the processor achieves 28,572 in multithreaded performance, 97,625 in integer math, and 58,965 in floating-point math. Data compression reaches 343,952, while data encryption hits 20,487. Extended instructions score 25,434, and random string sorting finishes at 41,867.

Single-thread performance for the AMD part is competitive within its class. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,762, Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,468, and R20 single-core score of 1,456 indicate a capable per-core design. The find prime numbers score of 87 and physics score of 1,389 round out the PassMark suite.

The Intel Core i9-14901KE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50, compared to the AMD part's 86th percentile. The nearest rivals for the AMD processor include the AMD EPYC 4245P with an average score of 39,215 and a delta of 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 at 39,485 with a delta of -0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS at 39,603 with a delta of -0.7%, and the Intel Core i7-13700F at 39,009 with a delta of 0.8%. These deltas show the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS sits within a narrow band of less than 1% from its closest competitors, making it statistically comparable to the EPYC 4245P and Ryzen AI 7 450, while slightly trailing the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

Because no head-to-head test results exist, any direct comparison between the two processors in this section must rely on the architectural and specification data alone. The Intel part's lack of benchmark entries means it cannot be positioned against the AMD part's recorded scores in any workload category.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing and design lineages. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename Hawk Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The Intel Core i9-14901KE uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Its die size is 257 mm², and no transistor count is recorded in the database.

Both processors feature 8 cores and 16 threads, and both have a base clock of 3.80 GHz. The boost clocks diverge: the AMD part reaches 5.10 GHz, while the Intel part boosts to 5.80 GHz. The thermal design power differs substantially, with the AMD part rated at 45 watts and the Intel part at 125 watts. The AMD processor is a mobile segment part using AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel processor is a desktop segment part using Intel Socket 1700.

Cache configurations differ across all levels. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel processor a larger total cache footprint at every level.

Memory support also differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCI Express capabilities separate the two as well. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD processor includes Radeon 780M graphics, and the Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor is not multiplier unlocked, while the Intel processor is multiplier unlocked.

Release timing places the AMD part first, with a release date of April 15, 2024. The Intel part followed on June 30, 2024. Both are listed as Active in production status. The AMD part has two recorded part numbers, 100-000001316 for FP7r2 and 100-000001387 for FP7, while the Intel part has one, Q49DSRNJC. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The recorded data makes the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS the only processor in this pairing with measurable benchmark results. Its full suite of Cinebench and PassMark scores, combined with an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, gives it a clear evidentiary position. The Intel Core i9-14901KE has no benchmark entries, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking, so no performance conclusions can be drawn from the database for that part.

For users selecting based on the available data, the AMD processor offers verified multi-threaded performance in the range of 24,565 points in Cinebench R23 and 28,572 in PassMark multithreaded tests. It also carries a 45-watt TDP, which makes it a power-efficient option compared to the Intel part's 125-watt TDP. The AMD processor's mobile segment designation and FP7 socket target portable systems, while the Intel part's desktop designation and LGA 1700 socket target stationary builds.

The Intel processor does bring a higher boost clock of 5.80 GHz against 5.10 GHz, larger L3 cache of 36 MB against 16 MB, Gen 5 PCIe support against Gen 4, and an unlocked multiplier. These are specification advantages, not measured performance advantages, and the database contains no scores to confirm their impact. The Intel part also supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which broadens platform compatibility, but again, no benchmark data exists to quantify any benefit.

The data supports the AMD processor for any user who requires documented performance results. The Intel processor remains a specification-only entry in the database, with its capabilities unverified by recorded measurements.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors as recorded in the database:

• Boost clock: AMD 5.10 GHz, Intel 5.80 GHz
• TDP: AMD 45 W, Intel 125 W
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7, Intel Socket 1700
• Architecture: Zen 4, Raptor Lake
• Codename: Hawk Point, Raptor Lake-R
• Generation: Ryzen 7 (Zen 4, Hawk Point), Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
• Process node: 4 nm, 10 nm
• Foundry: TSMC, Intel
• Transistors: 25,000 million, not recorded
• Die size: 178 mm², 257 mm²
• L1 cache: 64 KB per core, 80 KB per core
• L2 cache: 1 MB per core, 2 MB per core
• L3 cache: 16 MB shared, 36 MB shared
• Memory support: DDR5, DDR4 and DDR5
• Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s, not recorded
• PCIe: Gen 4 with 20 lanes, Gen 5 with 16 lanes
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 780M, UHD Graphics 770
• Market segment: Mobile, Desktop
• Release date: April 15, 2024, June 30, 2024
• Multiplier unlocked: false, true
• Part number: 100-000001316 and 100-000001387, Q49DSRNJC
• Benchmarks: 17 recorded scores, none recorded
• Percentile versus all CPUs: 86, 50
• Average benchmark score: 39,325, 0

Fields that match include core count at 8, thread count at 16, base clock at 3.80 GHz, dual-channel memory bus, and ECC memory support.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE boosts to 5.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS boosts to 5.10 GHz.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: Both processors have 8 cores and 16 threads, and both have a base clock of 3.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What benchmark scores are available for the Intel Core i9-14901KE?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the Intel processor. Its benchmark array is empty, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What is the AMD processor's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS ranks in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39,325.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and the Intel Core i9-14901KE support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE supports Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins in every category where measured data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,565, R20 multicore score of 10,317, and R15 multicore score of 2,476 provide documented multi-threaded performance. PassMark multithreaded performance at 28,572, integer math at 97,625, floating-point math at 58,965, data compression at 343,952, and data encryption at 20,487 all contribute to its verified profile. Single-thread results are also recorded, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3,468 and PassMark single-thread at 3,762.

The AMD processor also wins on power efficiency, with a 45-watt TDP against the Intel part's 125 watts. Its mobile market segment and FP7 socket suit portable and low-power platforms. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is recorded, giving it a quantified memory throughput advantage that the Intel part lacks.

The Intel Core i9-14901KE wins on specification grounds where the database records an advantage. Its 5.80 GHz boost clock exceeds the AMD part's 5.10 GHz. Its L3 cache of 36 MB more than doubles the AMD part's 16 MB. L1 cache per core at 80 KB and L2 cache per core at 2 MB both exceed the AMD part's 64 KB and 1 MB figures. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes represents a newer interconnect standard than Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, a feature the AMD part does not offer. Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives platform flexibility beyond the AMD part's DDR5-only support.

The Intel part's desktop segment designation and LGA 1700 socket target stationary systems, and its larger die size of 257 mm² reflects a different physical design approach. However, none of these specification wins are backed by benchmark scores in the database. The AMD processor's 86th percentile ranking and 39,325 average benchmark score stand as the only measured performance data in this comparison, while the Intel processor's 50th percentile and 0 average score indicate an absence of recorded results rather than a measured deficit.