AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for this comparison is one-sided. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark entries in the database, meaning it has zero recorded scores across all tested workloads. The Intel Core 5 213PTE, by contrast, has a full suite of 17 benchmark results spanning Cinebench render tests and PassMark compute workloads. With no head-to-head benchmark pairs available and winsA and winsB both at zero, the comparison rests entirely on the Intel part's measured performance and its position relative to established processors.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751 and a single-core score of 3070. In Cinebench R20, it records 9135 multi-core and 1289 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 2192 multi-core and 309 single-core. These scores place the chip at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32924. Its nearest rivals, all within a 0.5% delta, include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G at 33089 (0.5% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33079 (0.5% ahead), the Intel Core i7-12700 at 32942 (0.1% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 (0.3% behind). This clustering indicates the Core 5 213PTE sits in a tightly contested performance band where a single workload can flip the ranking.

PassMark results further characterize the Intel part. Integer math scores 93109, floating point math scores 71722, and extended instructions score 16146. Data compression reaches 261083, while data encryption hits 14413. Prime number finding scores 157, random string sorting scores 30106, and physics computation scores 2199. The multi-thread score is 25590, and single-thread performance is 3718. These figures show a processor that handles both parallel and serial workloads with measurable competence, though the lack of any AMD Ryzen 3 110 data prevents a direct numerical comparison.

The absence of benchmarks for the AMD part is itself a finding. The database records its percentileVsAllCpus at 50, which suggests a mid-pack position, but the avgBenchmarkScore of 0 and empty benchmark array indicate no verified performance data has been captured. This means any claim about the Ryzen 3 110's speed relative to the Core 5 213PTE would be speculation, not analysis.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and zero wins in head-to-head comparisons for the Ryzen 3 110. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 213PTE compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32924, placing it within 0.5% of four rivals. It is 0.1% behind the Intel Core i7-12700, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G.

Q: What is the Intel Core 5 213PTE's Cinebench R23 performance?

A: The database records a multi-core score of 21751 and a single-core score of 3070 in Cinebench R23. These are the highest Cinebench scores recorded for this processor across the R15, R20, and R23 versions.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock at 5.20 GHz versus 4.30 GHz, though its base clock is lower at 2.10 GHz versus 3.00 GHz.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 5 213PTE?

A: The launch MSRP is $221. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Q: Which processor holds a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE ranks at the 83rd percentile, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 ranks at the 50th percentile. This suggests the Intel part is positioned notably higher in the overall performance distribution, though the AMD part's percentile is not backed by measured scores.

The Verdict

The data supports choosing the Intel Core 5 213PTE for any workload where measured performance matters. It has a complete benchmark profile, a high average score of 32924, and a 83rd percentile ranking. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 offers no recorded performance evidence, so it cannot be justified on the basis of benchmark results. The Core 5 213PTE's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 21751 and single-core score of 3070, combined with PassMark multi-thread and single-thread scores of 25590 and 3718, indicate a processor that is competitive with the top chips in its immediate performance band. The Ryzen 3 110's 4 cores and 8 threads, paired with a 28 TDP, target a different segment: lower power mobile use. The Intel part's 8 cores, 16 threads, and 45 TDP target desktop workloads where sustained throughput is expected. For users who require verified performance, the Intel processor is the only option with data. For users who prioritize power efficiency and mobile operation, the AMD part has a structural advantage on paper, but its performance remains unquantified.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ: 3.00 GHz for AMD versus 2.10 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks differ more substantially: 4.30 GHz for AMD versus 5.20 GHz for Intel. TDP ratings are 28 watts for AMD and 45 watts for Intel. Sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700. Process nodes differ: 6 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The AMD die size is recorded as 210 mm², while Intel's die size is not listed. Cache layouts diverge: AMD uses 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3; Intel uses 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with identical 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. PCIe generations differ: AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD has Radeon 660M, Intel has UHD Graphics 730. Market segments differ: AMD is mobile, Intel is desktop. Release dates differ: AMD released on September 30, 2025, Intel on March 8, 2026. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221; AMD has none recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a 10 nm process from Intel's own foundry. The generation labels confirm the split: AMD lists "Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))" while Intel lists "Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)". The AMD processor integrates the Radeon 660M graphics unit, while Intel integrates UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part's L3 cache totals 8 MB shared, a modest amount for a 4-core design. The Intel part's L3 cache totals 24 MB shared, three times larger. L2 cache also favors Intel: 2 MB per core versus 512 KB per core. L1 cache favors Intel as well: 80 KB per core versus 64 KB per core. Both processors are locked, with no unlocked multiplier. The AMD part's part number is listed as 100-000000549 (FP7r2), and the Intel part's is SA4QM. Neither processor has a vCache 3D variant. The AMD processor is built for the FP7 socket, indicating a laptop-oriented platform, while the Intel processor uses LGA 1700, a desktop socket. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving platform flexibility, while the AMD part is restricted to DDR5. PCIe Gen 5 on the Intel side provides newer interconnect technology, though with 16 lanes versus AMD's 20 Gen 4 lanes. The Intel part's higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz suggests a design tuned for single-thread responsiveness, while the AMD part's lower 28 W TDP indicates a power-constrained mobile design.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins on every measured benchmark category because it is the only processor with recorded data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751 and single-core score of 3070 place it in the upper tier of the database, with rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen 7 8700G within half a percent. The PassMark integer math score of 93109 and floating point math score of 71722 show strong arithmetic throughput. Data compression at 261083 and data encryption at 14413 indicate solid memory-bound and cryptographic workloads. The physics score of 2199 and extended instructions score of 16146 round out a general-purpose profile. The single-thread PassMark score of 3718 matches the Cinebench single-core result, confirming strong serial performance.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins on structural efficiency. Its 28 W TDP versus Intel's 45 W TDP represents a significant power advantage. Its 6 nm process node versus Intel's 10 nm node suggests a denser, more power-efficient design. Its mobile market segment and FP7 socket target thin-and-light laptops, while the Intel part targets desktop builds. The AMD part has more PCIe lanes at 20 versus 16, though on an older Gen 4 standard. The AMD part's 4.30 GHz boost clock is lower than Intel's 5.20 GHz, but its 3.00 GHz base clock is higher than Intel's 2.10 GHz. For workloads that prioritize power efficiency, portability, or platform compactness, the Ryzen 3 110 has a structural case. For workloads that prioritize raw throughput, multi-threading, or verified benchmark performance, the Core 5 213PTE is the clear choice. The data does not support a performance win for the AMD part because no performance data exists. The Intel part's 83rd percentile ranking and 32924 average score give it a measured position in the upper mid-range of all CPUs, while the AMD part's 50th percentile ranking is unverified by any benchmark result.