AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 5 211E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 versus the Intel Core 5 211E. The database lists no common test scores for the Ryzen 3 110, meaning its benchmark profile is empty. The Intel Core 5 211E, by contrast, has a full set of recorded measurements across Cinebench and Passmark workloads.

Without direct comparative scores, the analysis must rely on the available single-processor data. The Intel Core 5 211E achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20389 and a single-core score of 2878. In Cinebench R20, it records 8563 multi-core and 1208 single-core. The R15 results show 2055 multi-core and 289 single-core. The Passmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 23833 and a single-thread score of 4006. The Ryzen 3 110 has no corresponding numbers, so no delta can be computed between the two parts.

The Intel Core 5 211E sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 37829. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804, a delta of 0.1 percent; the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762, a delta of 0.2 percent; the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, a delta of -0.2 percent; and the Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911, a delta of -0.2 percent. These margins are minimal, indicating the Core 5 211E performs within a narrow band of similarly positioned processors. The Ryzen 3 110 holds a 50th percentile ranking, but with an average benchmark score of 0, its relative standing cannot be validated through measured data.

The lack of Ryzen 3 110 benchmark entries means the database offers no evidence of any workload where the AMD part wins. The Intel part, conversely, delivers measurable results across every recorded test, from Passmark data compression at 346757 to Passmark find prime numbers at 43. The data confirms the Core 5 211E is a fully characterized processor, while the Ryzen 3 110 remains unmeasured.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The node difference is significant: 6 nm versus 10 nm indicates the AMD part uses a denser, more modern manufacturing process.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. This gives the Intel part a 6-core, 8-thread advantage. The Ryzen 3 110 operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core 5 211E has a lower base clock of 2.70 GHz but a higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz. Peak single-thread frequency favors Intel by 0.60 GHz, while base frequency favors AMD by 0.30 GHz.

Cache hierarchies are markedly different. The Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 211E has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part holds a clear advantage in every cache level: 16 KB more L1 per core, 1.5 MB more L2 per core, and 12 MB more shared L3.

The die size reflects the process and design differences. The AMD part measures 210 mm², while the Intel part measures 257 mm². The Intel die is 47 mm² larger. Both processors support dual-channel memory with a recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Memory type support differs: the Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 5 211E supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both support ECC memory. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7 and is classified as a mobile processor. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop processor.

PCIe support differs. The Ryzen 3 110 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel Core 5 211E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Intel's interface is a newer generation but offers 4 fewer CPU lanes. Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 660M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part was released on 2025-09-30, while the Intel part was released on 2025-01-12, making Intel the earlier launch by roughly eight months.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core 5 211E boosts to 4.90 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 211E is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 211E compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core 5 211E has an average benchmark score of 37829. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-14901E, scores 37911, a delta of -0.2 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, also a delta of -0.2 percent.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors:

• Manufacturer: AMD versus Intel.
• Cores: 4 versus 10.
• Threads: 8 versus 16.
• Base clock: 3.00 GHz versus 2.70 GHz.
• Boost clock: 4.30 GHz versus 4.90 GHz.
• TDP: 28 versus 65.
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700.
• Architecture: Zen 3+ versus no recorded architecture value.
• Codename: Rembrandt-R versus Bartlett Lake.
• Process node: 6 nm versus 10 nm.
• Foundry: TSMC versus Intel.
• Die size: 210 mm² versus 257 mm².
• L1 cache: 64 KB per core versus 80 KB per core.
• L2 cache: 512 KB per core versus 2 MB per core.
• L3 cache: 8 MB shared versus 20 MB shared.
• Memory support: DDR5 versus DDR4, DDR5.
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 Lanes versus Gen 5, 16 Lanes.
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 660M versus UHD Graphics 730.
• Market segment: Mobile versus Desktop.
• Release date: 2025-09-30 versus 2025-01-12.
• Part number: 100-000000549(FP7r2) versus SRQERQ65F.

Unchanged fields include memory bus (dual-channel for both), memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s for both), ECC support (true for both), and multiplier unlock status (false for both). The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $221; the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211E wins in every category where measured data exists. Its 10-core, 16-thread configuration produces a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20389, and its boost clock of 4.90 GHz supports a single-core score of 2878 in the same test. Passmark results reinforce this: multi-thread at 23833, single-thread at 4006, integer math at 88117, floating point math at 66402, and extended instructions at 21592. The data compression score of 346757 and data encryption score of 17938 further indicate strong throughput in data-heavy tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins on efficiency-oriented specifications. Its TDP of 28 is substantially lower than the Intel part's 65, making it the more power-conscious design. Its 6 nm process node at TSMC is smaller than Intel's 10 nm node. The Ryzen 3 110 also provides more PCIe lanes (20 versus 16) and uses the newer Gen 4 interface, though Intel's Gen 5 is a newer standard. The AMD part's base clock of 3.00 GHz is higher than Intel's 2.70 GHz, a minor advantage for sustained baseline workloads.

The Intel Core 5 211E holds the advantage in cache capacity, L3 at 20 MB versus 8 MB, and in memory flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part is restricted to DDR5. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock by 0.60 GHz. The AMD part is classified as mobile, the Intel part as desktop, which aligns with their respective power envelopes and socket types.

The Verdict

The database indicates the Intel Core 5 211E and the AMD Ryzen 3 110 are not directly comparable in measured performance, because the Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores. The Intel Core 5 211E delivers a full suite of results, placing it at the 86th percentile with an average score of 37829. The Ryzen 3 110 sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, meaning the database contains no evidence of its actual throughput.

The Intel part offers more cores, more threads, more cache, a higher boost clock, and a larger die. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, uses a desktop socket, and has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD part offers a lower TDP, a smaller process node, more PCIe lanes, and a higher base clock, but it is limited to DDR5 and is a mobile-class chip. For workloads requiring multi-threaded performance, the Intel Core 5 211E is the only option with supporting data. For low-power or mobile applications, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has the specification profile, but no benchmark results confirm its capability. The recorded data favors the Intel part across every measurable metric.