AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 3 305 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database shows a clear overall winner between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 3 305. The Intel Core 3 305 holds a decisive advantage across the recorded workload suite, with a notable exception in single-threaded performance where the AMD part pulls ahead.

The most significant win for Intel comes in multi-core workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core 3 305 scores 13123, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark score in the database. The same pattern holds across other multi-threaded tests. The Intel chip records a 5511 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and a 1322 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. For the AMD Ryzen 3 110, the database contains no benchmark entries at all, making direct comparisons impossible from the recorded data. The analysis must therefore rely on the Intel part's absolute scores and its position against its nearest rivals.

The Intel Core 3 305's average benchmark score of 18302 places it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs in the database. This is a strong result. Its nearest rivals show a tightly clustered group: the Intel Core i3-14100 scores 18318, a delta of -0.1 percent relative to the Core 3 305; the Intel Core 5 330 scores 18345, a delta of -0.2 percent; the Intel Core 7 360 scores 18374, a delta of -0.4 percent; and the AMD Ryzen 5 2600E scores 18230, a delta of 0.4 percent. The Core 3 305 effectively trades blows with these four chips, sitting within a 0.4 percent band. This indicates that the Core 3 305 delivers performance comparable to a mid-range 14th-generation Intel desktop chip and a previous-generation AMD Ryzen 5, despite being a mobile processor.

Looking at the Intel part's individual PassMark results, the multi-thread score of 15439 and the single-thread score of 3977 (recorded twice under slightly different test names) show a balanced profile. The floating-point math score of 42284 and the integer math score of 32295 indicate strong arithmetic throughput. The data compression score of 146857 is notably high, while the encryption score of 11019 is comparatively modest. The extended instructions score of 13543 and the random string sorting score of 17623 round out the Intel part's processing capabilities.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110, by contrast, has a percentile rank of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0 in the database. This means no recorded measurements exist for it. The database shows zero wins for the AMD part and zero wins for the Intel part in head-to-head comparisons, as no head-to-head benchmark entries are populated. The absence of AMD data is a critical limitation: the Intel Core 3 305's performance can be characterized precisely, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 cannot be benchmarked from the recorded information.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core 3 305's average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 has an average benchmark score of 18302, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 305 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 is within 0.4 percent of all four nearest rivals. It trails the Intel Core i3-14100 by 0.1 percent, the Intel Core 5 330 by 0.2 percent, and the Intel Core 7 360 by 0.4 percent, while leading the AMD Ryzen 5 2600E by 0.4 percent.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50.

Q: What are the key single-threaded scores for the Intel Core 3 305?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 records a single-thread score of 3977 in PassMark (recorded under both "single_thread" and "singlethread" test names), a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1852, a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 777, and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 186.

Q: What is the Intel Core 3 305's best multi-threaded result?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core 3 305 scores 13123. Its PassMark multi-thread score is 15439.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 3 305 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their internal designs. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Core 3 305 uses the Wildcat Lake codename on a 3 nm process node from Intel. The AMD part integrates a Radeon 660M graphics unit, while the Intel part integrates Intel Xe3 Graphics with one Xe core.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 305 provides 192 KB of L1 cache total, 2.5 MB of L2 cache total, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part's per-core cache allocation is larger for L2, while the Intel part's total L1 figure is spread across six cores rather than four.

Memory architecture shows a major split. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus and a maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 3 305 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory but uses a single-channel memory bus, limiting its memory bandwidth to 59.7 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory. The AMD part's dual-channel configuration provides a 28.6 percent bandwidth advantage over the Intel part's single-channel configuration, based on the recorded figures of 76.8 GB/s versus 59.7 GB/s.

PCI Express connectivity also differs. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core 3 305 provides PCIe Gen 4 with only 6 lanes from the CPU. This gives the AMD part substantially more expansion and I/O capability.

The die size is recorded for the AMD part at 210 mm², while the Intel part has no die size listed. The AMD part's process node is 6 nm from TSMC, the Intel part's is 3 nm from Intel. The Intel part uses a smaller process node, which typically indicates higher transistor density, though no transistor counts are recorded for either CPU.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 3 305 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part's base clock is 3.00 GHz, while the Intel part's base clock is 1.50 GHz. Both share the same boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Thermal design power differs: the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 3 305 has a TDP of 15 watts. This makes the Intel part the lower-power option by 13 watts.

The sockets are incompatible: the AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel Core 3 305 uses Intel BGA 1516.

Memory support differs in both type and channel configuration. The AMD part supports DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported by the AMD part but not by the Intel part.

PCIe lanes differ: the AMD part has 20 lanes of Gen 4, the Intel part has 6 lanes of Gen 4.

The integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 660M, the Intel part uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with one Xe core.

Release dates differ: the AMD Ryzen 3 110 was released on 2025-09-30, while the Intel Core 3 305 was released on 2026-04-15. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $309, while the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.

Process nodes differ: the AMD part is 6 nm from TSMC, the Intel part is 3 nm from Intel. The AMD part has a recorded die size of 210 mm², while the Intel part has no die size recorded.

The Verdict

The benchmark data favors the Intel Core 3 305 decisively, but only because the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmarks. The Intel part's average score of 18302 and 72nd percentile ranking demonstrate solid performance. Its proximity to the Intel Core i3-14100 (delta -0.1 percent), Intel Core 5 330 (delta -0.2 percent), Intel Core 7 360 (delta -0.4 percent), and AMD Ryzen 5 2600E (delta 0.4 percent) suggests that the Core 3 305 performs like a competent desktop-class chip in a mobile package.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 cannot be evaluated from benchmark data. Its 50th percentile rank and zero average score mean no performance measurements exist in the database. The specification sheet suggests a capable design: 4 cores with 8 threads, a 4.30 GHz boost clock, 8 MB of L3 cache, dual-channel DDR5 with ECC support, and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. These features point to a chip designed for bandwidth and I/O flexibility rather than raw core count.

The Intel Core 3 305 wins on core count with 6 cores versus 4, but the AMD part has simultaneous multithreading, giving it 8 threads versus 6. The AMD part has a higher base clock at 3.00 GHz versus 1.50 GHz, though both boost to 4.30 GHz. The AMD part's dual-channel memory and higher bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s versus 59.7 GB/s make it the better choice for memory-intensive tasks. The Intel part's lower TDP of 15 watts versus 28 watts makes it the more power-efficient option.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 305 wins in all measured benchmark categories because it is the only part with recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13123 and PassMark multi-thread score of 15439 indicate strong parallel processing. The data compression score of 146857 is particularly high, suggesting good performance in compression workloads. The floating-point math score of 42284 and integer math score of 32295 show balanced arithmetic capability. For users who rely on the database's recorded metrics, the Intel part delivers verified performance.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins on specification-based advantages. Its dual-channel memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth provides a theoretical memory throughput advantage over the Intel part's single-channel 59.7 GB/s. The AMD part's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes offer substantially more I/O connectivity than the Intel part's 6 lanes. ECC memory support gives the AMD part an edge for data integrity-sensitive workloads. The higher base clock of 3.00 GHz versus 1.50 GHz suggests better sustained low-thread performance, though both parts share the same 4.30 GHz boost clock.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 also wins on thread count with 8 threads versus 6, which can benefit heavily parallel workloads. The Intel Core 3 305 wins on power efficiency with a 15 watt TDP versus 28 watts, and on process node with 3 nm versus 6 nm. The Intel part's smaller process node and lower TDP make it the better choice for power-constrained mobile designs. The AMD part's larger die size of 210 mm² and older 6 nm node indicate a more power-hungry design.

For users prioritizing verified benchmark performance, the Intel Core 3 305 is the only option with recorded data. For users prioritizing memory bandwidth, ECC support, I/O lanes, or thread count, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 offers specification-level advantages that the database cannot currently confirm through benchmarks.