AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data available in the database is one-sided: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is the only processor in this comparison with recorded test scores. Every workload measurement in the database belongs to the Ryzen AI 9 465, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark entries at all. This means the use-case split is not a matter of trading victories, but rather identifying where the Ryzen AI 9 465's strengths align with specific workload types.

The Ryzen AI 9 465's strongest results appear in multi-threaded productivity workloads. Cinebench R23 multi-core returns a score of 17462.5, while the older Cinebench R15 multi-core test produces 2672.5. These two results, separated by several Cinebench revisions, both indicate substantial parallel throughput. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28986 reinforces this pattern. Integer math also performs strongly at 99156, while floating-point math reaches 62411. These numbers suggest a processor well-suited for rendering, scientific computation, and other workloads that scale with core count.

Single-thread performance is also competitive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1996.5 and Cinebench R15 single-core score of 247 place the Ryzen AI 9 465 in a strong position for responsiveness in everyday applications. PassMark single-thread performance sits at 3750, which is consistent with a modern mobile processor.

Specialized instruction workloads show particular strength. The PassMark extended instructions score of 24773 indicates solid SIMD and advanced instruction set throughput. Data encryption scores 17601, while data compression reaches 349463, a very high figure that suggests strong performance in archiving, database compression, and file transfer scenarios. Random string sorting at 37379 and prime number finding at 124 round out the mixed workload picture.

Physics simulation scores 1689 in PassMark, which is moderate relative to the other results but still represents a usable level of performance for physics-based calculations. The Ryzen 3 110, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no wins can be attributed to it. The use-case split therefore favors the Ryzen AI 9 465 across every measurable category.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 465 boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The Ryzen 3 110 has a higher base clock at 3.00 GHz compared to the Ryzen AI 9 465's 2.00 GHz.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 9 465 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 465 has an average benchmark score of 43431. It sits 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 (43326), 0.5% above the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (43210), and 0.6% below both the AMD Ryzen 7 170 (43689) and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 (43704).

Q: What is the L3 cache capacity difference?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 465 has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 465 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Ryzen 3 110 supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the Ryzen AI 9 465 has higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 110.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 465 uses a 4 nm process node, while the Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm process node. Both are manufactured by TSMC.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair, and the Ryzen 3 110 has no individual benchmark scores recorded. All performance comparisons must therefore be drawn from the Ryzen AI 9 465's absolute scores and its position relative to other processors in the database.

The Ryzen AI 9 465's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17462.5 is its single largest performance indicator. This places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 43431 confirms that position. The nearest rival comparison shows the field is tight: the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 43326 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 43210 (0.5% lower), while the Ryzen 7 170 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 both edge ahead at 43689 and 43704 respectively, each 0.6% higher.

Single-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R23, reaches 1996.5. The PassMark single-thread score of 3750 corroborates this result. These figures, combined with the 88th percentile ranking, indicate that the Ryzen AI 9 465 delivers strong per-core performance for a mobile processor.

The data compression score of 349463 is notably high and likely reflects both the core count and the cache architecture. The 16 MB L3 cache provides ample working space for compression algorithms that benefit from frequent data reuse. Data encryption at 17601 shows more modest throughput, which is typical for workloads that are often memory-bandwidth limited rather than compute limited.

Memory bandwidth measures 89.6 GB/s, which supports the high data throughput seen in the compression benchmark. The Ryzen 3 110's 76.8 GB/s bandwidth would likely constrain similar workloads, though no benchmark data exists to confirm this directly.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The Ryzen AI 9 465 uses 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks differ notably: the Ryzen 3 110 runs at 3.00 GHz, while the Ryzen AI 9 465 runs at 2.00 GHz. Boost clocks reverse the relationship, with the Ryzen AI 9 465 reaching 5.00 GHz versus the Ryzen 3 110's 4.30 GHz.

Both processors have a TDP of 28, which means they fall into the same thermal envelope despite the large core count difference. The sockets differ: the Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen AI 9 465 uses AMD Socket FP8. Cache configurations diverge substantially. The Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen AI 9 465 has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3.

Memory support differs in both type and bandwidth. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only, while the Ryzen AI 9 465 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both use dual-channel buses. Memory bandwidth measures 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 110 and 89.6 GB/s for the Ryzen AI 9 465. ECC memory support also differs: the Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC, while the Ryzen AI 9 465 does not.

PCIe lane counts differ as well. The Ryzen 3 110 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen AI 9 465 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ, with the Ryzen 3 110 featuring a Radeon 660M and the Ryzen AI 9 465 featuring a Radeon 880M. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial. The Ryzen 3 110 is built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, which is a refresh of the Zen 3 design. The Ryzen AI 9 465 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Gorgon Point codename, representing two full generations of architectural advancement. The Zen 5 design in the Ryzen AI 9 465 combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores within a single package, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation.

Process technology separates the two as well. The Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm node, while the Ryzen AI 9 465 uses a 4 nm node, both from TSMC. Die sizes are similar in absolute terms, measuring 210 mm² for the Ryzen 3 110 and 233 mm² for the Ryzen AI 9 465, but the Ryzen AI 9 465 fits more than double the cores into that modestly larger die thanks to the denser process.

Cache architecture reflects the generational shift. The Ryzen AI 9 465 provides 80 KB of L1 per core versus 64 KB for the Ryzen 3 110, a 25% increase per core. L2 doubles from 512 KB per core to 1 MB per core. Total L3 doubles from 8 MB to 16 MB. These increases, combined with the higher core count, give the Ryzen AI 9 465 substantially more on-die data storage capacity.

The integrated graphics also represent a generational step. The Ryzen AI 9 465 uses a Radeon 880M, while the Ryzen 3 110 uses a Radeon 660M. Both are integrated solutions with no separate graphics memory, but the newer Radeon 880M benefits from the architectural improvements in the Zen 5 generation and the higher memory bandwidth available.

Memory architecture differences include the addition of LPDDR5X support on the Ryzen AI 9 465, which allows for lower-power memory configurations in thin-and-light mobile designs. The Ryzen 3 110 is limited to DDR5. The Ryzen AI 9 465 also achieves 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth versus 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 110, a 17% improvement.

The Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen AI 9 465 does not. This makes the Ryzen 3 110 potentially more suitable for error-sensitive workloads, though the Ryzen AI 9 465's raw performance advantage in every recorded benchmark suggests it is the stronger overall choice for general mobile computing. The Ryzen AI 9 465 also carries a newer release date of 2025-12-31, compared to the Ryzen 3 110's 2025-09-30, and a different part number (100-000001861 versus 100-000000549 for the Ryzen 3 110).