AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
Core i5-110
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Intel Core i5-110
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database places the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-110 sits in the 50th percentile. This gap is reflected directly in the recorded benchmark scores. The AMD processor delivers an average benchmark score of 43,431, whereas the Intel chip has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, resulting in an average score of zero. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison of specific test numbers impossible, but the percentile ranking alone indicates a substantial performance separation.
Looking at the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465's individual results, the data shows a strong multi-threaded presence. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 17,462.5 points, while its single-core score in the same test is 1,996.5. The Cinebench R15 results follow a similar pattern: 2,672.5 in multi-core and 247 in single-core. PassMark tests further detail its capabilities. The multi-thread score is 28,986, and the single-thread score is 3,750. Integer math operations complete at 99,156, floating-point math at 62,411, and extended instructions at 24,773. Data compression scores 349,463, while data encryption scores 17,601. The processor also handles prime number finding at 124, physics calculations at 1,689, and random string sorting at 37,379.
The Intel Core i5-110, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded. The database shows winsA as 0 and winsB as 0, indicating that no head-to-head benchmark entries exist between these two specific processors. The most meaningful comparison available comes from the AMD chip's nearest rivals. The Ryzen AI 9 465 is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 by 0.6% each. These deltas are small, suggesting that the Ryzen AI 9 465 performs in a tight cluster with those four processors. The Intel Core i5-110 has no nearest rivals listed, reinforcing its isolated position with no comparative data.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different manufacturing generations and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses a 14 nm process from Intel. This node difference is significant, as the smaller process allows for denser transistor packing and potentially lower power consumption per unit of performance.
The AMD chip is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel chip uses the older Comet Lake architecture, also its codename, and belongs to the Core i5 generation. It has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Cache hierarchies differ markedly. The AMD processor allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip's larger per-core L2 and L3 allocations suggest a design aimed at keeping more data closer to the cores.
Memory support diverges as well. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The AMD processor's memory bandwidth is more than double that of the Intel part, which can translate to faster data movement in memory-intensive workloads.
PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The newer PCIe generation on the AMD side offers higher bandwidth per lane.
Integrated graphics are present on both, but they are different. The AMD chip features a Radeon 880M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 630. The AMD part targets the mobile market segment with a socket of AMD Socket FP8 and a TDP of 28. The Intel part targets the desktop segment with Intel Socket 1200 and a TDP of 65.
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data points to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 as the clear winner in raw compute benchmarks. Its multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 17,462.5 and single-core score of 1,996.5 demonstrate capability across both threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark results reinforce this, with strong integer math, floating-point math, and extended instruction performance. The 88th percentile ranking places it well above the median CPU in the database.
The Intel Core i5-110 offers no benchmark data to claim wins. Its 50th percentile ranking indicates average performance relative to all CPUs, but without specific test scores, the database cannot confirm its strengths in any workload category. The AMD chip's advantages in architecture, such as the smaller process node, higher core count, larger cache, and faster memory bandwidth, all support its benchmark dominance.
In specific use cases, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 shows particular strength in multi-threaded scenarios. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,672.5 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 28,986 suggest it handles parallel tasks well. The data compression score of 349,463 indicates efficiency in file compression and decompression workloads. The floating-point math score of 62,411 points to solid performance in scientific and engineering applications. The single-thread score of 3,750 in PassMark and 247 in Cinebench R15 show that lightly threaded tasks also execute quickly.
The Intel Core i5-110, with no scores, cannot be assigned any wins. The database records no scenario where it outperforms the AMD chip. The only area where the Intel part differs in a potentially favorable way is its higher base clock of 2.90 GHz compared to 2.00 GHz on the AMD chip. However, the AMD chip's boost clock of 5.00 GHz exceeds the Intel chip's 4.30 GHz, and the benchmark data, where available, favors AMD.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.90 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 4.30 GHz for Intel. TDP is 28 for AMD and 65 for Intel. Sockets are AMD Socket FP8 and Intel Socket 1200, respectively.
Process node and foundry differ: 4 nm from TSMC for AMD, 14 nm from Intel for Intel. Die size is 233 mm² for AMD, with no recorded die size for Intel. L1 cache is 80 KB per core for AMD and 64 KB per core for Intel. L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 256 KB per core for Intel. L3 cache is 16 MB for AMD and 12 MB shared for Intel.
Memory support, bus, and bandwidth all differ. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus at 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 with a dual-channel bus at 42.7 GB/s. Both have ECC memory disabled. PCIe generation and lanes differ: Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD, Gen 3 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 880M for AMD and UHD Graphics 630 for Intel.
Market segment, release date, part number, and launch MSRP also differ. AMD is mobile, Intel is desktop. AMD's release date is recorded as 2025-12-31, while Intel's is 2025-09-10. AMD's part number is 100-000001861, Intel's is SA35X. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $200, while AMD has no listed MSRP. Both are locked multipliers.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher core count?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What is the performance percentile difference between the two?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-110 sits in the 50th percentile.
Q: How do their memory bandwidths compare?
A: The AMD chip supports 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth with DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel chip supports 42.7 GB/s with DDR4.
Q: Are there any benchmark scores recorded for the Intel Core i5-110?
A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Core i5-110, giving it an average benchmark score of zero.
Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-110 uses a 14 nm process from Intel.
Q: What is the TDP of each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has a TDP of 28. The Intel Core i5-110 has a TDP of 65.
The Verdict
The data in the database favors the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 decisively. Its 88th percentile ranking, active benchmark scores, and architectural advantages in process node, core count, cache size, and memory bandwidth point to a processor that outperforms the Intel Core i5-110 across the board. The Intel chip's 50th percentile ranking, combined with zero recorded benchmark scores, leaves it without a single measurable win in this comparison.
The AMD processor delivers multi-threaded performance that places it among CPUs in the top 12% of the database. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.6% of its average score, indicating that it competes closely with processors like the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. The Intel Core i5-110, by contrast, has no nearest rivals and no benchmark data, so its performance cannot be contextualized beyond its median percentile position.
For workloads that depend on multi-core processing, data compression, or floating-point math, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 shows clear strengths. For single-threaded tasks, its boost clock of 5.00 GHz and PassMark single-thread score of 3,750 indicate solid responsiveness. The Intel Core i5-110 offers a higher base clock and a lower launch MSRP of $200, but the database records no performance data to support any claim of superiority. Based on the available information, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is the processor with demonstrated capability, while the Intel Core i5-110 remains an unquantified entry in the database.