AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 3 110, so all comparative analysis must rely on the measured results for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and its position within the database. The Ryzen AI 9 365 produces substantial multi-threaded scores: 18,698 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,842 points in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Its Geekbench multi-core result reaches 13,760, while single-core performance is recorded at 2,253 in Geekbench and 1,992 in Cinebench R23. These figures place the chip at the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 40,048.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Ryzen AI 9 365. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 averages 40,081 points, a delta of -0.1% relative to the Ryzen AI 9 365, indicating near parity. The Intel Core 5 221E follows at 40,144 points (-0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 270 records 40,246 points (-0.5%). The Intel Core i9-13905H trails at 40,313 points (-0.7%). These deltas are all negative, meaning the Ryzen AI 9 365 sits slightly below each of these four rivals in average score, yet the margins are remarkably tight: the largest gap is just 0.7%.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 also shows strong results in specialized workloads. PassMark integer math scores 101,831, floating point math reaches 62,802, and extended instructions hit 25,113. Data encryption completes at 18,297, while data compression records 354,510. The multithread score is 29,467, physics processing lands at 1,704, and random string sorting finishes at 39,447. Single-thread performance in PassMark is 3,841, and prime number finding scores 117.

Since the Ryzen 3 110 lacks benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison cannot quantify wins in either direction. The database shows zero wins for both items. What can be stated is that the Ryzen AI 9 365 is a measured performer with consistent results across rendering, general compute, and encryption workloads, and it competes within 1% of several desktop and mobile processors in the database. The Ryzen 3 110 remains unmeasured, so any performance relationship between the two is absent from the recorded data.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the database entries, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the only chip with verified performance data. It delivers 10 cores and 20 threads, boosts to 5.00 GHz, and carries a 4 nm process node. The recorded benchmarks show a processor that performs in the upper tier of the database, with an 87th percentile ranking and an average score of 40,048. Its nearest rivals, all scoring within 0.7% higher, confirm that the Ryzen AI 9 365 sits in competitive territory for multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks alike.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110, by contrast, has no benchmark scores, no average score, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects the absence of data rather than measured performance. It offers 4 cores and 8 threads, a 4.30 GHz boost clock, and a 6 nm process node. Without recorded results, the database cannot support any claim of superiority or inferiority for the Ryzen 3 110 relative to the Ryzen AI 9 365.

Users who require verified multi-threaded throughput, such as rendering or compilation workloads, have evidence in the database pointing to the Ryzen AI 9 365. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,698 and Geekbench multi-core score of 13,760 indicate strong parallel processing capability. Users who prioritize a smaller core count and lower complexity may consider the Ryzen 3 110, but no performance data exists to validate that choice. The database verdict is clear: the Ryzen AI 9 365 is the measured option, while the Ryzen 3 110 is an unverified entry.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 outperform the AMD Ryzen 3 110 in the database?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the Ryzen 3 110, so no direct comparison is possible. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has extensive recorded results, including an 18,698 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and a 13,760 Geekbench multi-core score, but the Ryzen 3 110 has no entries.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Ryzen 3 110 ranks at the 50th percentile, which reflects the lack of recorded benchmark data rather than a measured performance level.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 9 365 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 at 40,081 average score (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core 5 221E at 40,144 (-0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 at 40,246 (-0.5%), and the Intel Core i9-13905H at 40,313 (-0.7%). The Ryzen AI 9 365 trails each by less than 1%.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for both chips?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the Ryzen AI 9 365 and 3.00 GHz for the Ryzen 3 110.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 does not.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 3.00 GHz for the Ryzen 3 110 and 2.00 GHz for the Ryzen AI 9 365, but boost clocks reverse the order: 4.30 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. Both are rated at 28 W TDP. The socket differs, with the Ryzen 3 110 using AMD Socket FP7 and the Ryzen AI 9 365 using AMD Socket FP8. The Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory, the Ryzen AI 9 365 does not. PCIe lane counts also differ: the Ryzen 3 110 provides 20 lanes (Gen 4), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 provides 16 lanes (Gen 4). Memory support shows the Ryzen 3 110 with DDR5 only, whereas the Ryzen AI 9 365 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is higher on the Ryzen AI 9 365 at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 110. The integrated graphics differ as well: Radeon 660M on the Ryzen 3 110, Radeon 880M on the Ryzen AI 9 365. Release dates are recorded as September 30, 2025 for the Ryzen 3 110 and June 30, 2024 for the Ryzen AI 9 365. Part numbers are 100-000000549(FP7r2) for the Ryzen 3 110 and 100-000001530 for the Ryzen AI 9 365. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between the two processors is substantial. The Ryzen 3 110 is built on Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, with a 6 nm process node from TSMC and a die size of 210 mm². The Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Zen 5 architecture with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid configuration, codenamed Strix Point, manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC node with a die size of 233 mm². Cache structures differ significantly. The Ryzen 3 110 provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen AI 9 365 offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The larger per-core caches on the Ryzen AI 9 365, combined with double the L3 capacity, point to higher instruction throughput potential, though no direct benchmark data for the Ryzen 3 110 exists to confirm that in practice. The Ryzen AI 9 365 also incorporates the newer Zen 5 core design with a 4 nm process, representing a two-generation architectural leap over the Zen 3+ parts in the Ryzen 3 110. The database records no transistor counts for either chip, so density comparisons are limited to the node and die size figures available.