AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 holds a commanding advantage across the recorded benchmark suite, with the database showing no head-to-head wins for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 in any measured test. The Ryzen AI 5 435 posts an average benchmark score of 28,128, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs tracked, while the Ryzen 3 110 sits at the 50th percentile with no benchmark scores recorded for direct comparison.

Focusing on the Ryzen AI 5 435’s available scores, the Cinebench results demonstrate strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the chip scores 11,333 points, and in Cinebench R15 multi-core it reaches 1,686. Single-core results are comparatively modest: 1,816 in Cinebench R23 and 260 in Cinebench R15. The gap between multi-core and single-core scores reflects the processor’s 6-core, 12-thread configuration, which favors parallel workloads.

PassMark results add further detail. The multithread score of 19,000 and single-thread score of 3,734 show a roughly 5.1x ratio, indicating strong scaling across cores. Integer math reaches 61,026, while floating-point math posts 40,627. Data compression scores 225,374, which is the highest single value in the entire recorded set, suggesting substantial throughput for compression workloads. Data encryption reaches 11,110, extended instructions score 16,197, and random string sorting posts 24,891. Physics simulation scores 1,075, while prime number finding is the outlier at just 58.

Relative to its nearest rivals in the database, the Ryzen AI 5 435 is effectively tied with Intel Core i5-13490F, which posts an average score of 28,185, a delta of -0.2% (meaning the Ryzen is 0.2% behind). The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28,065, putting the Ryzen 0.2% ahead. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28,054 (Ryzen 0.3% ahead), and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G scores 28,032 (Ryzen 0.3% ahead). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, so the Ryzen AI 5 435 performs on par with that peer group in aggregate scoring.

The Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, so direct numerical comparison against the Ryzen AI 5 435 is impossible from measured data. However, its specifications indicate a clear capability gap. The Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 uses 6 cores and 12 threads. That 50% increase in core and thread count alone explains a large portion of the multi-threaded performance difference seen in the Ryzen AI 5 435’s scores, even without direct measurements for the Ryzen 3 110.

Single-thread performance also favors the Ryzen AI 5 435 based on clock specifications. The Ryzen AI 5 435 boosts to 4.50 GHz, whereas the Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. Although base clocks are lower on the Ryzen AI 5 435 (2.00 GHz versus 3.00 GHz), boost behavior matters more in bursty workloads. The 0.20 GHz boost advantage, combined with the newer Zen 5 architecture, gives the Ryzen AI 5 435 the edge in single-threaded tasks, as evidenced by its 3,734 PassMark single-thread score.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core performance?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 435, with 6 cores and 12 threads, records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,333 and a PassMark multithread score of 19,000. The Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, and no benchmark scores are recorded in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 5 435 compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 28,128 is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-13490F (28,185), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T (28,065), and 0.3% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28,054) and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (28,032).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 435 supports 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the Ryzen 3 110 supports 76.8 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the Ryzen AI 5 435 also adds LPDDR5X memory support.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 includes a Radeon 840M. The database does not record graphics benchmark scores for either.

Q: What is the production status and release timing?

A: Both are listed as Active production. The Ryzen 3 110 has a release date of September 30, 2025, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 has a release date of January 4, 2026.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 435 sits at the 80th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Ryzen 3 110 sits at the 50th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen AI 5 435 wins in every benchmark category where data exists. Its 6-core, 12-thread design delivers substantially higher multi-threaded throughput than the 4-core, 8-thread Ryzen 3 110 would be capable of, based on the core count difference. Workloads that scale with core count, such as rendering, video encoding, data compression, and scientific computation, will see a clear benefit from the Ryzen AI 5 435. The recorded Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,333 and PassMark data compression score of 225,374 reinforce this conclusion.

The Ryzen AI 5 435 also wins on single-thread performance, driven by its higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz versus 4.30 GHz and its newer Zen 5 architecture. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,734 indicates strong responsiveness in everyday applications, web browsing, and lightly threaded software. The 0.20 GHz boost advantage is modest, but the architectural upgrade from Zen 3+ to Zen 5 likely contributes additional instructions-per-clock gains, although the database does not provide IPC measurements to quantify that directly.

For the Ryzen 3 110, the wins are more limited. Its higher base clock of 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz suggests that in steady-state, fully loaded scenarios without boost headroom, it may sustain higher minimum frequencies. However, no benchmark data confirms this. The Ryzen 3 110 also has a smaller die size (210 mm² versus an unlisted die size for the Ryzen AI 5 435), which may imply lower manufacturing complexity, but that is not a performance metric.

In workloads that are heavily memory-bandwidth sensitive, the Ryzen AI 5 435 again takes the lead with 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. That 12.8 GB/s difference (about 17% more bandwidth) benefits tasks like large data set processing, database operations, and memory-intensive simulations. The Ryzen 3 110’s smaller L3 cache (8 MB shared versus 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 435) is a counterpoint, but the Ryzen AI 5 435 compensates with larger per-core L1 and L2 caches: 80 KB and 1 MB per core respectively, versus 64 KB and 512 KB per core on the Ryzen 3 110.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge on nearly every major specification. Core counts differ: the Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, favoring the Ryzen 3 110 at idle-to-light loads, but boost clocks favor the Ryzen AI 5 435 at 4.50 GHz versus 4.30 GHz. Both share a 28 W TDP.

Sockets are incompatible: the Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 uses AMD Socket FP8. This means they are not drop-in interchangeable on the same motherboard. The Ryzen 3 110’s part number is 100-000000549 (FP7r2), while the Ryzen AI 5 435 is 100-000001337.

Memory support differs. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is higher on the Ryzen AI 5 435: 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. Both use dual-channel buses, and both support ECC memory.

PCIe lane counts differ: the Ryzen 3 110 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen AI 5 435 provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The Ryzen 3 110 offers more PCIe connectivity, which may matter for users adding discrete GPUs or NVMe storage.

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 660M on the Ryzen 3 110 versus Radeon 840M on the Ryzen AI 5 435. The database does not record graphics performance scores, so no direct comparison is possible.

Release dates differ by roughly three months: September 30, 2025 for the Ryzen 3 110, and January 4, 2026 for the Ryzen AI 5 435. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

The Ryzen 3 110 has a die size of 210 mm², while the Ryzen AI 5 435 has no die size listed. Transistor counts are not recorded for either processor.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 3 110 is built on Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, using a 6 nm process node from TSMC. The Ryzen AI 5 435 uses Zen 5 architecture (with Zen 5c variants in the generation), codenamed Gorgon Point, on a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The smaller 4 nm node enables higher transistor density and typically improves power efficiency, although the database does not record power consumption beyond the identical 28 W TDP.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen AI 5 435 has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. While the Ryzen AI 5 435 has larger per-core caches, its total L3 is half that of the Ryzen 3 110. This tradeoff affects workloads with large working sets that rely on shared cache, where the Ryzen 3 110’s 8 MB L3 may reduce memory traffic, versus the Ryzen AI 5 435’s larger individual core caches that speed up per-thread access patterns.

The Ryzen 3 110 belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation (Zen 3+ Rembrandt), while the Ryzen AI 5 435 belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). The “AI” branding on the Ryzen AI 5 435 suggests integrated AI acceleration features, but the database does not list specific NPU specifications or AI benchmark scores for either processor.

Both processors use TSMC as the foundry, but the process node difference (6 nm versus 4 nm) is significant. The 4 nm process generally allows higher clock speeds at lower voltage, consistent with the Ryzen AI 5 435’s higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz despite a much lower base clock of 2.00 GHz. The Ryzen 3 110’s higher base clock of 3.00 GHz suggests it is tuned for sustained operation at moderate frequencies, possibly reflecting the older node’s characteristics.

The die size of 210 mm² on the Ryzen 3 110 indicates a relatively large physical die, likely due to the integrated Radeon 660M graphics and the 6 nm process. The Ryzen AI 5 435’s die size is not recorded, so no physical comparison can be made.

The memory controller differs in supported types: the Ryzen 3 110 is limited to DDR5, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 adds LPDDR5X support, which is common in thin-and-light mobile designs. The higher memory bandwidth on the Ryzen AI 5 435 (89.6 GB/s) aligns with its newer memory controller design.

The PCIe implementation also differs: 20 Gen 4 lanes on the Ryzen 3 110 versus 14 Gen 4 lanes on the Ryzen AI 5 435. This means the Ryzen 3 110 offers more expansion headroom, but the Ryzen AI 5 435’s fewer lanes may be sufficient for typical mobile configurations with one GPU and one SSD.

In summary, the architectural split is clear: the Ryzen 3 110 is a mature Zen 3+ design on 6 nm with more shared cache and PCIe lanes, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 is a newer Zen 5 design on 4 nm with more cores, higher boost clocks, larger per-core caches, higher memory bandwidth, and additional memory type support. The benchmark data records wins only for the Ryzen AI 5 435, and its 80th percentile ranking versus the Ryzen 3 110’s 50th percentile confirms the performance hierarchy.